Post-operative Outcomes of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery With and Without Drain Placement

NCT ID: NCT06938607

Last Updated: 2025-12-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

360 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-02-28

Study Completion Date

2029-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) is a widely performed surgical procedure used to treat cervical spondylosis and cervical disc herniations with cervical nerve root compression and or cervical spinal cord compression when conservative treatment options have been exhausted. The primary aim of ACDF is to alleviate neck, shoulder, and upper extremity pain associated with degenerative cervical disc disease by removing one or more affected discs, decompressing the nerves, and restoring cervical spine anatomy through the implantation of structural allograft/autograft bone or artificial spacers, plates, and screws. Historically, ACDF has demonstrated substantial long-term benefits in pain relief and quality of life improvements for patients. In the United States alone, the annual number of ACDF procedures exceeds 150,000 and is projected to rise significantly over the next four decades. Despite its technical complexity, ACDF is considered a relatively safe procedure. Common postoperative complications include dysphagia (1.7-9.5%), hematoma (0.4-5.6%), worsening myelopathy (0.2-3.3%), recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy (0.9-3.1%), cerebrospinal fluid leakage (0.5-1.7%), and surgical site infections (0.9-1.6%). One strategy employed to mitigate postoperative complications such as hematoma, surgical site infection, and the need for reoperation is the placement of an indwelling subfascial drain within the surgical site. These drains facilitate the removal of accumulated blood or serous fluid, thereby reducing localized pressure and potentially preventing adverse outcomes. Despite its theoretical benefits, the utility of subfascial drains remains a topic of debate among surgeons. Given the limited evidence on the efficacy of subfascial drain placement following ACDF, this study proposes a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the necessity and impact of subfascial drain placement on postoperative outcomes.

This study will determine whether subfascial drain placement reduces the incidence of postoperative complications, including hematoma, infection, airway compromise and secondary surgeries, compared to no drain placement following ACDF surgery; assess the impact of subfascial drain placement on the severity and duration of postoperative dysphagia compared to no drain placement; and evaluate participant-reported outcomes and satisfaction, including postoperative pain and recovery experience, between the drain and no-drain groups.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) is a widely performed surgical procedure used to treat cervical spondylosis and cervical disc herniations with cervical nerve root compression and or cervical spinal cord compression when conservative treatment options have been exhausted. The primary aim of ACDF is to alleviate neck, shoulder, and upper extremity pain associated with degenerative cervical disc disease by removing one or more affected discs, decompressing the nerves, and restoring cervical spine anatomy through the implantation of structural allograft/autograft bone or artificial spacers, plates, and screws. Historically, ACDF has demonstrated substantial long-term benefits in pain relief and quality of life improvements for patients. In the United States alone, the annual number of ACDF procedures exceeds 150,000 and is projected to rise significantly over the next four decades. Despite its technical complexity, ACDF is considered a relatively safe procedure. Common postoperative complications include dysphagia (1.7-9.5%), hematoma (0.4-5.6%), worsening myelopathy (0.2-3.3%), recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy (0.9-3.1%), cerebrospinal fluid leakage (0.5-1.7%), and surgical site infections (0.9-1.6%). One strategy employed to mitigate postoperative complications such as hematoma, surgical site infection, and the need for reoperation is the placement of an indwelling subfascial drain within the surgical site. These drains facilitate the removal of accumulated blood or serous fluid, thereby reducing localized pressure and potentially preventing adverse outcomes. Despite its theoretical benefits, the utility of subfascial drains remains a topic of debate among surgeons. Given the limited evidence on the efficacy of subfascial drain placement following ACDF, this study proposes a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the necessity and impact of subfascial drain placement on postoperative outcomes.

This study will determine whether subfascial drain placement reduces the incidence of postoperative complications, including hematoma, infection, airway compromise and secondary surgeries, compared to no drain placement following ACDF surgery; assess the impact of subfascial drain placement on the severity and duration of postoperative dysphagia compared to no drain placement; and evaluate participant-reported outcomes and satisfaction, including postoperative pain and recovery experience, between the drain and no-drain groups. Up to 360 participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. Those signed to the drain group will have a surgical drain placed on the surface of the wound during closure. The drain will be removed within 24 hours. Those in the no-drain group will have their wound closed without a drain. All other aspects of participants' care before and after surgery will be the same. No additional visits are required for this study. Basic information will be collected from participants' medical records, such as age, gender, type of surgery. For 180 days following surgery, participants' health will be monitored through clinical visit notes, phone calls with their doctor or clinic staff, and records of any hospital visits due to complications.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

ACDF Surgery

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

ACDF Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

No-drain group

Participants assigned to the no-drain group will have their wound closed without a drain.

No interventions assigned to this group

Drain group

Participants assigned to the drain group will have a surgical drain placed on the surface of the wound during closure. The drain will be removed within 24 hours.

Drain

Intervention Type DEVICE

Participants assigned to the drain group will have a surgical drain placed on the surface of the wound during closure. The drain will be removed within 24 hours.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Drain

Participants assigned to the drain group will have a surgical drain placed on the surface of the wound during closure. The drain will be removed within 24 hours.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 19-75 years of age
* Having elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* Unable to stop anticoagulation medication
* Cervical (neck) cancer or tumor
* Combined anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, and posterior cervical fusion
* Active infection or trauma
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Nebraska

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Chris Cornett, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Nebraska

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Nebraska Medical Center

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Chris Cornett, MD

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 402-559-5626

Email: [email protected]

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Chris Cornett, MD

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0199-25-FB

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id