The Measurement of Empathy and Its Efficacy in Psychotherapy

NCT ID: NCT00620009

Last Updated: 2008-02-21

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 16 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2002-06-30
• Study Completion Date: 2007-06-30

Brief Summary

The purpose of the research is to: 1) to test whether psychotherapy including immediate feedback of empathy data is more efficacious than therapy without such an exchange of data, 2) to measure the degree of accuracy of therapist's empathy and its relationship to the patient's estimate of the therapist's empathy.

Detailed Description

Objective: To develop and evaluate a feedback method for measuring and increasing therapists' empathic accuracy and reducing empathic errors in psychotherapy. Method: Sixteen (16) patient-therapist pairs were randomly assigned to intervention and control groups. All patients rated their own functioning using the GAF (Global Assessment of Functioning) and predicted the accuracy with which their therapists would estimate their ratings. Therapists rated the patient's GAF, predicted the patients' ratings of their own GAFs, and rated their confidence in their own predictions. In the intervention condition, therapist and patients discussed the previous session's ratings for a few minutes of the therapy session. Results: Intervention therapists showed greater empathic accuracy relative to controls on our empathy measure (t(14) = 2.69, p < .01) and increased empathy over time on the Barrett-Lenard Empathy subscale (t(32) = 3.21, p < .01). We also found significant effects on errors related to perceived accuracy of therapist empathy. Patients in the control group were found to perceive their therapists to be either more or less accurate than was actually the case (over/under-idealization), but such biases were not as strong in the intervention group. Similarly, therapists in the control group were likely to over-estimate their own accuracy (over-confidence) to a greater extent than intervention therapists. Affective responses to the instrument were positive overall and did not differ by condition. Conclusion: Empathy feedback and feedback concerning degrees of patient idealization and therapist confidence may be effective in improving functioning as well as in increasing empathic accuracy in psychotherapy.

Conditions

Psychotherapeutic Processes; Transference (Psychology)

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT
• Blinding Strategy: SINGLE

Study Groups

Control

Therapists and patients record their estimates of the patient's Global Assessment of Functioning, but do not discuss these estimates in therapy sessions.

Group Type: NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Empathy Feedback

Therapists and patients record their ratings of the patient's Global Assessment of Functioning and discuss these ratings.

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

Empathy Feedback

Intervention Type: BEHAVIORAL

Discussion of empathy ratings between patients and therapists during psychotherapy sessions.

Interventions

Empathy Feedback

Discussion of empathy ratings between patients and therapists during psychotherapy sessions.

Intervention Type: BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Outpatient psychotherapy at University of Illinois at Chicago
• Age 18-65

Exclusion Criteria

• Psychosis
• Suicidality
• Organic Brain Disorder

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 65 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

University of Illinois at Chicago

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

University of Illinois at Chicago

Principal Investigators

Bhaskar N. Sripada, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Illinois at Chicago

Locations

University of Illinois at Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Countries

United States

Other Identifiers

2002-0381

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id