Effects of Systematic Patient Feedback on Therapy Outcome
NCT ID: NCT01796223
Last Updated: 2018-09-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
170 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-12-31
2017-06-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Patient Participation in Mental Health Care
NCT01083225
The STIC Norway RCT Study: Using Feedback in Psychotherapy.
NCT01873742
Can Psychotherapy Reduce Sickness Absence?
NCT01181635
Assessing Psychotherapy Outcome With Feedback
NCT02023736
Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Personalized Prediction and Adaptation Tools in Psychotherapy
NCT03107845
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Feedback
Feedback system included in psychotherapy
Feedback
The Partners for Change Outcome Management System, administered at the beginning and ending of every therapy session.
control
Psychotherapy as usual
Control
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Feedback
The Partners for Change Outcome Management System, administered at the beginning and ending of every therapy session.
Control
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Poor/no understanding of Norwegian language
* Lack of ability to execute the practical procedures required for the project
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Olav M Linaker, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Mariela M Lara, MA
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
National Taiwan Normal University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Tiller Distriktspsykiatriske Senter
Trondheim, , Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Brattland H, Koksvik JM, Burkeland O, Grawe RW, Klockner C, Linaker OM, Ryum T, Wampold B, Lara-Cabrera ML, Iversen VC. The effects of routine outcome monitoring (ROM) on therapy outcomes in the course of an implementation process: A randomized clinical trial. J Couns Psychol. 2018 Oct;65(5):641-652. doi: 10.1037/cou0000286. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
Brattland H, Koksvik JM, Burkeland O, Klockner CA, Lara-Cabrera ML, Miller SD, Wampold B, Ryum T, Iversen VC. Does the working alliance mediate the effect of routine outcome monitoring (ROM) and alliance feedback on psychotherapy outcomes? A secondary analysis from a randomized clinical trial. J Couns Psychol. 2019 Mar;66(2):234-246. doi: 10.1037/cou0000320. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2011/1271
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
2011/1271
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.