The STIC Norway RCT Study: Using Feedback in Psychotherapy.

NCT ID: NCT01873742

Last Updated: 2020-05-04

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

328 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-06-01

Study Completion Date

2016-10-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Feedback in psychotherapy involves clients monitoring therapy process and progress, and on a frequent basis clients register these data into online questionnaires. These data are then fed back to the therapist, hence informing about the process and progress in therapy. This information can be shared with the client, something that may enhance the client involvement in evaluating and planning of the therapy. The same data can be used for research purpose. This randomized controlled multicenter study within Norwegian couple and family contexts will explore the effects of feedback in natural settings, and it collaborates closely with a similar American study in Chicago/Evanston, Ill.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The improvement rate in psychotherapy is generally regarded as 50%, while 10% of clients deteriorate after therapy. This indicates a potential for improvement. Research shows that in therapies with the lack of progress, the clients rarely express dissatisfaction about progress to their therapists, and parallel, these therapists consider the therapies to proceed in the right direction. There is therefore a need for more knowledge about (a) how to obtain reliable information about the therapy progress and process monitored frequently during the course of therapy, and (b) that this information is fed back to the therapist and the client so that they (c) jointly can evaluate and adjust the aims and means for improving the therapy, something that may (d) enable them to test more appropriate approaches. This clinical practice should also enhance the client collaboration and empowerment in therapy, hopefully leading to higher recovery rate, shorter treatments, and reduced drop-out. To date, there is limited research on whether and how the use of feedback can contribute to improved outcomes. Such research is especially lacking in couple and family therapy. In a 3-year Norwegian pilot project at the Center for Family and relationships, Modum Bad, Department of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Sørlandet Sykehus, and at Ålesund family counseling office, the online-based feedback system STIC (Systemic Therapy Inventory of Change) has been implemented and tested. The clinical experience is positive, and the system is considered suitable. This project has evolved parallel to a similar project at the Family Institute at Northwestern University, Evanston, Ill., supervised by the founder of the STIC system, professor William M. Pinsof. The project now enters a new phase by conducting a randomized, controlled trial (RCT) at three Norwegian couple- and family therapy sites in collaboration with five American psychotherapy sites to investigate whether the use of ongoing feedback is associated to more effective therapy compared with therapy without use of feedback.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Psychological Feedback

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

The use of STIC feedback system

This will constitute the experimental condition, using of STIC feedback system.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

STIC feedback system

Intervention Type OTHER

This condition includes the use of the STIC feedback system.

Treatment as usual

This condition will not include the use of the STIC feedback system.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

STIC feedback system

Intervention Type OTHER

This condition includes the use of the STIC feedback system.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

STIC feedback system

This condition includes the use of the STIC feedback system.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* individuals,
* couples,
* families in Norwegian couple- and family therapy contexts

Exclusion Criteria

* psychosis,
* current drug and alcohol abuse,
* violent and threatening behavior,
* not enable to understand Norwegian or English language.
Minimum Eligible Age

12 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Stiftelsen Helse og Rehabilitering

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Modum Bad

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Terje Tilden, PhD

Terje Tilden, PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

KariAnne Vrabel, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Modum Bad Research Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Drammen - Kongsberg family agency

Drammen, Buskerud, Norway

Site Status

Center for family and relationship, Modum Bad

Vikersund, Buskerud, Norway

Site Status

ABUP, Sørlandet sykehus

Kristiansand, Vest Agder, Norway

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Norway

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Pinsof WM, Zinbarg RE, Lebow JL, Knobloch-Fedders LM, Durbin E, Chambers A, Latta T, Karam E, Goldsmith J, Friedman G. Laying the foundation for progress research in family, couple, and individual therapy: the development and psychometric features of the initial systemic therapy inventory of change. Psychother Res. 2009 Mar;19(2):143-56. doi: 10.1080/10503300802669973.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19235092 (View on PubMed)

Tilden T, Johnson SU, Hoffart A, Zahl-Olsen R, Wampold BE, Ulvenes P, Haland AT. Alliance predicting progress in couple therapy. Psychotherapy (Chic). 2021 Sep;58(3):391-400. doi: 10.1037/pst0000355. Epub 2021 Feb 4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33539145 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.family-institute.org/research/dan-j-epstein-family-foundation-center-for-psychotherapy-change

Presentation of the Psychotherapy Change Project which is the overarching project for the STIC system.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2012/2/0275

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

1-Tilden

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Starting the Conversation
NCT04107714 TERMINATED PHASE2