Effect of a 'Rapid-Return-to-work Program' in Mild Mental Disorders.

NCT ID: NCT04457635

Last Updated: 2020-07-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-09-30

Study Completion Date

2016-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating the effect of brief versus short psychotherapy in subjects with substantial mental complaints.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Running evaluations of the brief intervention (BI) at our outpatient clinic preceding to this study had given us the impression that the patients obtained a more active coping style towards their health problems with consequential enhanced work participation (WP). These evaluations, in addition to our experiences in BI for low back pain (LBP) has generated the current hypothesis of this study towards WP. Yet, the sustainability of WP and long-term effects on mental health remained questionable. In this pragmatic RCT the objective was to compare brief psychotherapy with focus on normalization and coping (Brief-PsT) with short-term psychotherapy of standard duration with more extended focus (Short-PsT), as otherwise used at the Mental Health services. The primary aim of this study was to assess differences in effect on WP and the secondary aim was to assess differences in clinical response. The investigators hypothesized that in the short term, Brief-PsT could facilitate or sustain WP in a superior fashion to Short-PsT in persons who are on, or at risk of sick leave due to mental health problems. Although the investigators expected a substantial long-term rate of clinical recovery and reduction in mental health-related symptoms in both groups, the investigators had no specific hypothesis regarding the extent and direction of possible group differences in these clinical measurements.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Mental Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Pragmatic randomized controled trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Outcome assessor of primary outcome (sickness benefit) is masked for intervention allocation. Other outcome measures are assessed by patient questionnaires.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Brief psychotherapy (brief PsT)

The focus was on normalizing, accepting and coping with their present mental health complaints and their hindrance for work participation. Primarily, there was no intention to process previous pathogenic experiences. The standard duration was set on six sessions.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Psychotherapy

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Short psychotherapy (short-PsT)

With more extended focus, there was besides coping of mental health and challenges concerning WP, an emphasis on both an extensive anamnesis and possibility to establish a so-called central theme based on previous or current challenging issues such as trauma, difficult childhood conditions, and personality-related issues. Additional aims of the intervention could include reducing symptoms and problematic behaviour and an improvement of home situation, with deeper focus on cognitive maladaptive coping strategies or dynamic repetitions. The number of sessions was aimed to be 20 on average

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Psychotherapy

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Psychotherapy

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 'mental complaints' was the main reason for referral to the outpatient clinic
* employed and on or at risk of sick leave

Exclusion Criteria

* acute or severe pathology that required greater input than the clinic could offer,
* Sick-leave had \> 9 months during the preceding 2 years
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

67 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Hospital of Vestfold

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Aage Indahl

professor emeritus

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Aage Indahl, Prof.Dr

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Vestfol Hospital Trust

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HVestfold

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Treatment of Post-TBI Depression
NCT00211835 COMPLETED NA