Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-07-15
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparing Delivery Methods of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depressed African-American Dementia Caregivers
NCT00769769
Prevention of Depression in Spouses of People With Cognitive Impairment
NCT00321971
Effectiveness of School-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Preventing Depression in Young Adolescents
NCT00360451
Sleep To Reduce Incident Depression Effectively
NCT03322774
Stress Reduction Intervention for Enhancing Treatment Outcome for Depressed Minority Patients
NCT00998959
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Investigators recently observed that MADs predict the depression symptoms persistence, independent of other key factors in dCGs. Data from dCGs shows that the relationship between MADs and depression symptoms involves heightened resting-state amygdala-posterior cingulate connectivity. In the context of prior literature, this implicates rumination. Given that bi-directional relations are plausible, controlled experimental data are needed to determine if targeting morning inactivation influences depression's mechanisms. If so, this would confirm MADs as a clinically actionable intervention target for controlling associated depression mechanisms.
Investigators piloted targeting MADs by using activity scheduling and monitoring, the logically relevant component of existing approaches, which is called Scheduling Activity and Monitoring Mornings (SAMM). MADs are defined as difficulty "getting going" and related objective morning inactivity. The SAMM protocol aims to increase the ease/level morning activity engagement by making, scheduling, and monitoring a morning action plan. Pilot data demonstrates that SAMM engages the target (MADs) and affects mood. This support the feasibility of using SAMM to probe effects of target modification on the hypothesized (ruminative processes) and alternative pathways. Tracking effects of modifying MADs with multi-modal data will elucidate how MADs may contribute in depression's mechanism. This randomized controlled study is needed to determine if SAMM has causal effects apart from non-specific therapeutic effects. Results will indicate if/how targeting MADs with SAMM could be pursued in precision efficacy trials.
Investigators are not proposing a prevention or treatment efficacy trial. The overarching aim is to delineate a mechanism that investigators propose operates across continuums of depression severity, risk, and resilience. Aim 1 will compare dCGs selected to be on either end of a spectrum: dCGs with MADs at levels linked with depression symptoms versus "morning type" dCGs who habitually prefer morning activity engagement. This provides a window into the mechanism by which MADs predict depression symptom persistence, while being a "morning type" appears protective. This contrasts with the designs of depression risk/incidence, prevention efficacy, and treatment efficacy studies; such studies select participants based on depression thresholds, which here, would restrict natural variability in (and bias estimates of) the mechanism of interest. This contrasts with case-controlled studies that compare people with/without depression (regardless of morning activation); such designs could add mechanistic heterogeneity and divert signal from the process by which MADs relate to depression symptoms.
Aim 1 (observing mechanistic differences comparing ends of the MAD exposure spectrum): To characterize differences between dCGs who have MADs, compared with "morning type" dCGs, with regard to: (A) daily patterns rumination and mood symptoms; (B) resting-state connectivity; and (C) rumination cue-related activation.
Hypotheses: The group with MADs will have relatively (A) greater rumination and depression symptoms; and (B) greater resting amygdala-PCC connectivity; and (C) exaggerated limbic, DMN, and FPCN responses to rumination cues.
Additional model testing: Unique from concurrent correlations, MADs will predict later rumination and depression symptoms.
Aim 2 (modifying target): Among dCGs with MADs, test the effects of an active experimental probe targeting morning activity engagement (SAMM), compared with a contact-time matched control condition, on self-reported and actigraphy measured MADs.
Hypotheses: Relative to the control condition, the active probe will be associated with decreased self-reported MADs and increased actigraphy-measured morning activity.
Aim 3 (modifying mechanism via target): (A) Test effects of the active vs. control probes on EMA-measured rumination, resting-state connectivity, and brain network responses to rumination cues. (B) Evaluate if the probe's effects are explained by increases in morning activation.
Hypotheses: SAMM (vs. control) will be associated with reduced rumination and changes in the biomarker pattern listed in Aim 1.
Additional model testing: Experimental effects will be mediated by morning activation increases.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
BASIC_SCIENCE
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Active condition (SAMM Protocol)
The goal of the SAMM protocol is to increase morning activity engagement over a 6-week period. Participants in this condition will review their morning routine, and make a list of potential morning activities to add. They will choose one activity and develop a plan for doing it. Each day, participants are asked to track if they do the morning activity plan. If unsuccessful, at weekly follow-ups, participants are asked to refine their plan or make a new one.
Morning Action Plan Execution
Each day, participants are asked to track if they do the morning activity plan.
Activity Strategy-based Session with Therapist
Participants will meet weekly with a trained therapist to discuss their prescribed activity plan. If unsuccessful, at weekly follow-ups, participants are asked to refine their plan or make a new one. Each session lasts about 30-45 minutes.
Advance sleep-wake time
Some participants will be asked to adjust their sleep schedule to accommodate morning activity engagement by introducing or altering mechanisms known promote early rising (i.e., light exposure, reward and processes, etc.)
Attention-matched supportive control condition
Participants in this condition will receive sessions in the same number and duration as the SAMM experimental condition. Therapists will create a comfortable environment by demonstrating interest, empathy, and acceptance without judgment. Caregivers will be encouraged to talk about stressors they experience, providing an opportunity to voice and self-address their problems. In this control condition, therapists will not deliver any particular strategy except for active listening and referring to the educational materials.
Attention-based Session with Therapist
Participants will meet weekly with trained a therapist to talk about stressors they experience, providing an opportunity to voice and self-address their problems. In this control condition, therapists will not deliver any particular strategy except for active listening and referring to the educational materials
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Morning Action Plan Execution
Each day, participants are asked to track if they do the morning activity plan.
Activity Strategy-based Session with Therapist
Participants will meet weekly with a trained therapist to discuss their prescribed activity plan. If unsuccessful, at weekly follow-ups, participants are asked to refine their plan or make a new one. Each session lasts about 30-45 minutes.
Attention-based Session with Therapist
Participants will meet weekly with trained a therapist to talk about stressors they experience, providing an opportunity to voice and self-address their problems. In this control condition, therapists will not deliver any particular strategy except for active listening and referring to the educational materials
Advance sleep-wake time
Some participants will be asked to adjust their sleep schedule to accommodate morning activity engagement by introducing or altering mechanisms known promote early rising (i.e., light exposure, reward and processes, etc.)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Provide at least 15 hours/week of unpaid care to a patient with a dementia diagnosis.
* Reporting stress or strain delivering care
* No or stable pharmacotherapy for depression
* Meets screening definition for having morning activation difficulty or a definite morning types per the Composite Morningness Questionnaire (CMQ)
Exclusion Criteria
* Active Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for mood or insomnia
* Probable dementia diagnosis
* Deadly illness or plans to leave the study area
* Current active substance use disorder
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
NIH
University of Pittsburgh
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Stephen Smagula
Assistant Professor of Psychiatry
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stephen F Smagula, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Pittsburgh
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UPMC Western Behavioral Health
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MH125846
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
STUDY21100123
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.