GORE PROPATEN Vascular Graft vs. Disadvantaged Autologous Vein Graft

NCT ID: NCT00617279

Last Updated: 2012-01-12

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

31 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-12-31

Study Completion Date

2010-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary patency of the GORE PROPATEN Vascular Graft is equivalent to or better than disadvantaged autologous vein graft in an infragenicular peripheral bypass application at 12 months.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Primary patency is defined as hemodynamic evidence of blood flow through an open graft that has maintained uninterrupted patency and has not previously undergone a revision to restore blood flow. A disadvantaged autologous vein is defined as meeting at least one of the two following criteria: (1) Any autologous vein(s) other than greater saphenous vein deemed usable by the Investigator; (2) Usable ipsilateral or contralateral autologous greater saphenous vein that meets any of the following criteria: (a) Diameter of less than or equal to 3.0 mm; (b) Inadequate length requiring splicing; (c) Poor quality vein that is either sclerotic or phlebitic.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

GORE PROPATEN Vascular Graft:

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

GORE PROPATEN Vascular Graft

Intervention Type DEVICE

Arterial Occlusion Bypass

Disadvantaged Autologous Vein Graft

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Disadvantaged Autologous Vein Graft

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Arterial Occlusion Bypass

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

GORE PROPATEN Vascular Graft

Arterial Occlusion Bypass

Intervention Type DEVICE

Disadvantaged Autologous Vein Graft

Arterial Occlusion Bypass

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patient requires below-knee bypass secondary to severe claudication, rest pain or tissue loss due to peripheral arterial occlusive disease.
2. Patient meets the disadvantaged autologous vein criteria described in Section 4.1.
3. Patient has a post-operative life expectancy greater than one year.
4. Patient is at least 21 years of age.
5. Patient is able to comply with all study requirements and be available for follow-up visits at 1, 6, 12, 24 and 36-months post-procedure.
6. Patient is willing and able to provide written, informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patient has had a previous instance of Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia type 2 (HIT-2) or has known hypersensitivity to heparin.
2. Patient requires an infragenicular bypass for reasons other than peripheral arterial occlusive disease.
3. Patient requires sequential extremity revascularizations or other procedures that require use of additional vascular grafts.
4. Patient is in need of, or is scheduled for, a cardiac surgical procedure or a different vascular surgical procedure within 30 days of study procedure. However, inflow procedures that facilitate the bypass are permitted, as long as they are not performed at the same sitting as the bypass procedure.
5. Patient has been previously randomized for this study.
6. Patient has active infection in the region of graft placement.
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

W.L.Gore & Associates

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Richard F. Neville, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Georgetown University Hospital

Jennifer Recknor, Ph.D.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

W.L.Gore & Associates

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Of Alabama Medical Center

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Georgetown University Hospital

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Emory University School of Medicine

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Medical Center of Central Georgia

Macon, Georgia, United States

Site Status

University of Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Vascular Specialty Associates

Baton Rouge, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

University of Maryland Medical Center

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Albany Medical Center

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

Stonybrook University Medical Center

Stony Brook, New York, United States

Site Status

Montifiore Medical Center

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Clinic

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Greenville Hospital System

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

University of Tennessee medical Center

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

The Methodist Hospital System

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Peripheral Vascular Associates

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Sentara Norfolk Hospital

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PPT 07-05

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.