GORE VIABAHN® Versus Plain Old Balloon Angioplasty (POBA) for Superficial Femoral Artery (SFA) In-Stent Restenosis

NCT ID: NCT01108861

Last Updated: 2014-09-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-05-31

Study Completion Date

2014-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a prospective, randomized, multi-center study recruiting patients with an in-stent restenosis in the superficial femoral artery. The safety and efficacity of the Viabahn endoprosthesis (W.L. Gore \& Associates), a heparin-bonded endoprosthesis, is compared with plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA). In 4 Belgian and 2 German centers a total of 80 Patients will be recruited. Primary endpoint is primary patency at 12 months, defined as no evidence of restenosis or occlusion within the originally treated lesion based on color-flow duplex ultrasound (CFDU) measuring a peak systolic velocity ratio ≤2.5, and without target lesion revascularization (TLR) within 12 months.

In comparison to POBA, it is expected that the use of the Viabahn endoprosthesis (W.L. Gore \& Associates) will result in greater 12 month primary patency of treated superficial femoral artery in-stent restenotic lesions.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Peripheral Vascular Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Endoprosthesis

GORE VIABAHN® Endoprosthesis

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

GORE VIABAHN® Endoprosthesis

Intervention Type DEVICE

GORE VIABAHN® Endoprosthesis

Plain old balloon angioplasty

Plain old balloon angioplasty

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Plain old balloon angioplasty

Intervention Type DEVICE

Plain old balloon angioplasty

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

GORE VIABAHN® Endoprosthesis

GORE VIABAHN® Endoprosthesis

Intervention Type DEVICE

Plain old balloon angioplasty

Plain old balloon angioplasty

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient presenting with lifestyle-limiting claudication, rest pain or minor tissue loss (Rutherford classification from 2 to 5)
* Patient is willing to comply with specified follow-up evaluations at the specified times
* Patient is \>18 years old
* Patient understands the nature of the procedure and provides written informed consent, prior to enrolment in the study
* Patient has a projected life-expectancy of at least 24 months
* Noninvasive lower extremity arterial studies (resting or exercise) demonstrate ankle-brachial index ≤0.8
* Patient is eligible for treatment with the Viabahn® Endoprosthesis (W.L. Gore)
* Male, infertile female, or female of child bearing potential practicing an acceptable method of birth control with a negative pregnancy test within 7 days prior to study procedure


* Restenotic or reoccluded lesion located in a stent which was previously implanted (\>30 days) in the superficial femoral artery, suitable for endovascular therapy
* Total target lesion length between 4 and 27 cm (comprising in-stent restenosis and adjacent stenotic disease)
* Minimum of 1.0cm of healthy vessel (non-stenotic) both proximal and distal to the treatment area
* Popliteal artery is patent at the intercondylar fossa of the femur to P3
* Target vessel diameter visually estimated to be \>4mm and \<7.6 mm at the proximal and distal treatment segments within the SFA
* Guidewire and delivery system successfully traversed lesion
* There is angiographic evidence of at least one-vessel-runoff to the foot, that does not require intervention (\<50% stenotic)

Exclusion Criteria

* Untreated flow-limiting aortoiliac stenotic disease
* Presence of a chronic total occlusion, i.e. a complete occlusion of the failed bare stent that cannot be re-opened with thrombolysis or does not allow easy passage of the guidewire by the physician
* Any previous surgery in the target vessel
* Severe ipsilateral common/deep femoral disease requiring surgical reintervention
* Perioperative unsuccessful ipsilateral percutaneous vascular procedure to treat inflow disease just prior to enrollment
* Femoral or popliteal aneurysm located at the target vessel
* Non-atherosclerotic disease resulting in occlusion (e.g. embolism, Buerger's disease, vasculitis)
* No patent tibial arteries (\>50% stenosis)
* Prior ipsilateral femoral artery bypass
* Severe medical comorbidities (untreated CAD/CHF, severe COPD, metastatic malignancy, dementia, etc) or other medical condition that would preclude compliance with the study protocol or 2-year life expectancy
* Serum creatinine \>2.5mg/dL within 45 days prior to study procedure unless the subject is currently on dialysis
* Major distal amputation (above the transmetatarsal) in the study or non-study limb
* Septicemia or bacteremia
* Any previously known coagulation disorder, including hypercoagulability
* Contraindication to anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy
* Known allergies to stent or stent graft components (nickel-titanium or ePTFE)
* Known allergy to contrast media that cannot be adequately pre-medicated prior to the study procedure
* Patient with known hypersensitivity to heparin, including those patients who have had a previous incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) type II
* Currently participating in another clinical research trial, unless approved by W.L. Gore \& Associates in advance of study enrolment
* Angiographic evidence of intra-arterial thrombus or atheroembolism from inflow treatment
* Any planned surgical intervention/procedure within 30 days of the study procedure
* Target lesion access not performed by transfemoral approach.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Flanders Medical Research Program

NETWORK

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marc Bosiers, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

AZ Sint Blasius

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Imelda Hospital

Bonheiden, , Belgium

Site Status

AZ Sint-Blasius

Dendermonde, , Belgium

Site Status

Universitair ziekenhuis antwerpen

Edegem, , Belgium

Site Status

Zuid Oost Limburg

Genk, , Belgium

Site Status

Herz-zentrum Bad Krozingen

Bad Krozingen, , Germany

Site Status

Herzzentrum

Leipzig, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bosiers M, Deloose K, Callaert J, Verbist J, Hendriks J, Lauwers P, Schroe H, Lansink W, Scheinert D, Schmidt A, Zeller T, Beschorner U, Noory E, Torsello G, Austermann M, Peeters P. Superiority of stent-grafts for in-stent restenosis in the superficial femoral artery: twelve-month results from a multicenter randomized trial. J Endovasc Ther. 2015 Feb;22(1):1-10. doi: 10.1177/1526602814564385.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25775672 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FMRP-100107

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.