Comparison of Prosthetic Femoropopliteal Bypass Versus Viabahn Endoprosthesis for Treatment of Symptomatic Femoral Artery Occlusive Disease

NCT ID: NCT00693823

Last Updated: 2008-06-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

86 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-09-30

Study Completion Date

2008-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is a comparison of two different ways to treat blockage in the artery of the thigh. The first is an older way with incisions in the groin and just above the knee. A plastic tube is then inserted to make a bypass from the groin to the knee. The second treatment offered is through a needle hole in the groin. A thin plastic tube covering a metal stent is inserted into the artery and released to bypass the blockage from inside the artery. No incisions are needed. Patients are enrolled and then selected for one treatment method or another by chance. The patients will be followed for two years to see how the two different treatment methods work compared to each other.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Atherosclerosis Lower Extremity Ischemia Claudication Rest Pain

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

atherosclerosis stent angioplasty covered stent

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Femoral-popliteal surgical bypass with prosthetic graft

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Femoral-popliteal Bypass

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Surgical placement of a prosthetic graft in the thigh from the groin to the knee

2

Interventional angioplasty and placement of an ePTFE covered stent graft within the femoral-popliteal artery as an endoluminal bypass percutaneously

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Angioplasty and stent placement with Viabahn covered stent-graft(W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstff, Arizona) of superficial femoral artery

Intervention Type DEVICE

Placement of an ePTFE covered stent graft within the superficial femoral artery in the thigh through a needle hole percutaneously

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Femoral-popliteal Bypass

Surgical placement of a prosthetic graft in the thigh from the groin to the knee

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Angioplasty and stent placement with Viabahn covered stent-graft(W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstff, Arizona) of superficial femoral artery

Placement of an ePTFE covered stent graft within the superficial femoral artery in the thigh through a needle hole percutaneously

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Viabahn endoprosthesis

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\-

Exclusion Criteria

\-
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

W.L.Gore & Associates

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Texas Vascular Associates

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Texas Vascular Associates/Baylor University Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Baylor University Medical Center

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lammer J, Dake MD, Bleyn J, Katzen BT, Cejna M, Piquet P, Becker GJ, Settlage RA. Peripheral arterial obstruction: prospective study of treatment with a transluminally placed self-expanding stent-graft. International Trial Study Group. Radiology. 2000 Oct;217(1):95-104. doi: 10.1148/radiology.217.1.r00se0595.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11012429 (View on PubMed)

Hartung O, Otero A, Dubuc M, Boufi M, Barthelemy P, Aissi K, Alimi YS. Efficacy of Hemobahn in the treatment of superficial femoral artery lesions in patients with acute or critical ischemia: a comparative study with claudicants. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2005 Sep;30(3):300-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.04.027.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15936230 (View on PubMed)

Fischer M, Schwabe C, Schulte KL. Value of the hemobahn/viabahn endoprosthesis in the treatment of long chronic lesions of the superficial femoral artery: 6 years of experience. J Endovasc Ther. 2006 Jun;13(3):281-90. doi: 10.1583/05-1799.1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16784314 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

003-179, Viabahn #1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id