Effectiveness of Lumbar Facet Joint Nerve Blocks

NCT ID: NCT00355914

Last Updated: 2013-11-26

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-08-31

Study Completion Date

2006-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

1. To demonstrate whether:

i. Facet joint nerve blocks have therapeutic value beyond the duration of local anesthetic effect.

ii. Adjuvant medications (Sarapin and Depo-steroids) provide additional relief of lumbar facet joint pain when used with facet joint nerve blocks.
2. To demonstrate whether or not there are clinically significant improvements in function of patients who receive lumbar facet joint nerve block with or without Sarapin and Depo-steroids (Group II) compared to patients randomized to Group I who receive only local anesthetic blocks.
3. To determine the adverse event profile in both groups.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Primary Outcome Measure(s) To demonstrate a clinically significant difference between the patients treated with adjuvants and those patients randomized to Group I in the pain status, physical, and psychological status and pain at 3, 6, 12, 18and 24 months post treatment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Low Back Pain

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Lumbar Facet Joint Nerve Block

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1 Without Steroids

Lumbar Facet Joint Nerve Block with Local Anesthetic (0.5 mL of 0.25% Bupivacaine with/without 0.5 mL of Sarapin)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Lumbar Facet Joint Nerve Block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Lumbar Facet Joint Nerve Block

Group 2 With Steroids

Lumbar Facet Joint Nerve Block with Local Anesthetic (0.5 mL of 0.25% Bupivacaine with/without 0.5 mL of Sarapin) and 0.15 mg of non-particulate betamethasone)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Lumbar Facet Joint Nerve Block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Lumbar Facet Joint Nerve Block

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lumbar Facet Joint Nerve Block

Lumbar Facet Joint Nerve Block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Positive for facet joint pain with comparative local anesthetic blocks

Candidates are over 18 years of age

Subjects with a history of chronic, function limiting low back pain of at least six months in duration Subjects who are able to give voluntary, written informed consent to participate in this investigation Subjects who, in the opinion of the Investigator, are able to understand this investigation, co-operate with the investigational procedures and are willing to return to the center for all the required post-operative follow-ups The subject has not had recent surgical procedures within the last three months.

Exclusion Criteria

* Negative or false-positive response to controlled comparative local anesthetic blocks

Narcotic use of greater than Hydrocodone 100 mg/day, Methadone 80 mg or Morphine 100 mg, or dose equivalent

Uncontrolled major Depression or uncontrolled psychiatric disorders

Uncontrolled or acute medical illnesses including coagulopathy, renal insufficiency, chronic liver dysfunction, progressive neurological deficit, urinary sphincter dysfunction, infection, increased intercranial pressure, pseudotumor cerebri, intercranial tumors, unstable angina, and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Chronic severe conditions that could interfere with the interpretations of the outcome assessments for pain and bodily function

Women who are pregnant or lactating

Subjects who have participated in a clinical study with an investigational product within 30 days of enrollment

Patients with multiple complaints involving concomitant hip osteoarthritis, will not be amenable to study due to the overlap of pain complaints.

Inability to achieve appropriate positioning and inability to understand informed consent and protocol History of adverse reaction to local anesthetic or anti-inflammatory drugs
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pain Management Center of Paducah

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Laxmaiah Manchikanti, MD

CEO

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Laxmaiah Manchikanti, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ambulatory Surgery Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ambulatory Surgery Center

Paducah, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Manchikanti L, Singh V, Falco FJ, Cash KA, Pampati V. Evaluation of lumbar facet joint nerve blocks in managing chronic low back pain: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial with a 2-year follow-up. Int J Med Sci. 2010 May 28;7(3):124-35. doi: 10.7150/ijms.7.124.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20567613 (View on PubMed)

Manchikanti L, Singh V, Falco FJ, Cash KA, Pampati V. Lumbar facet joint nerve blocks in managing chronic facet joint pain: one-year follow-up of a randomized, double-blind controlled trial: Clinical Trial NCT00355914. Pain Physician. 2008 Mar-Apr;11(2):121-32.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18354721 (View on PubMed)

Manchikanti L, Manchikanti KN, Manchukonda R, Cash KA, Damron KS, Pampati V, McManus CD. Evaluation of lumbar facet joint nerve blocks in the management of chronic low back pain: preliminary report of a randomized, double-blind controlled trial: clinical trial NCT00355914. Pain Physician. 2007 May;10(3):425-40.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17525777 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2880841/pdf/ijmsv07p0124.pdf

Evaluation of lumbar facet joint nerve blocks in managing chronic low back pain: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial with a 2-year follow-up.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

protocol3

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id