Effect of Neuromobılızatıon on Stiffness of Scıatıc Nerve

NCT ID: NCT05496387

Last Updated: 2025-04-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

36 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-10-15

Study Completion Date

2022-11-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Low back pain (LBP) is a common symptom that can be a health problem in worldwide. Studies have shown that 70% to 80% of all people are affected at least once in their lives. Although it is common, the cause of the pain has often not been determined and is referred to as non-specific LBP. The lumbar range of motion decreases, trunk flexion is limited, postural control and muscular stiffness are affected in individuals with LBP. Recent studies have shown that people with LBP have altered nerve properties in the sciatic nerve. It was observed that the cross-sectional area of the sciatic nerve decreased and its stiffness increased.

Peripheral nerve tissues are faced with great tension and compressive forces that occur in daily life activities and sports activities. To maintain the normal function of the nervous system, it must have the ability to resistance to tension, easy to slide in the environment it is in and withstand compressive forces. In case of not being able to resist the pressure exerted by surrounding tissues such as bone, tendon, muscle, fascia, there may be distortions in the shapes of neural structures.

Neuromobilization, one of the manual therapy techniques, is used in impingement syndromes of peripheral nerves and neuropathies. Neuromobilization aims to regain the normal mechanical properties of the nerve by using limb movements, motion and position of the joint. There are two methods of neuromobilization techniques; sliding and tension. Sliding involves combinations of movements that lengthen the nerve bed in one joint and reduce the length of the nerve bed in the next joint, while tension is done by stretching both ends of the nerve bed. Neuromobilization structures the balance between the relative movements of the neural tissues and the surrounding mechanical interface, allows the reduction of internal pressure in the neural tissue, and thus optimum physiological functions are regulated. The mechanism of action of neuromobilization is thought to be to increase intraneural circulation, improve axoplasmic flow and connective tissue viscoelasticity, and reduce hypersensitive areas.

Neuromobilization techniques are extensively used in clinical settings during the therapy of patients with sciatica, with favorable effects on pain and impairment. However, the mechanical implications of neuromobilization in human nerves are poorly understood. Two investigations that used SWE to measure sciatic nerve stiffness in healthy adults following prolonged slump positions came up with conflicting conclusions. It has been determined that there are different opinions on the effects of slump neuromobilizations in sciatic nerves. Considering that slump neuromobilization techniques are frequently used for therapeutic, it should be appropriate to determine their effects on the sciatic nerve.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neuromobılızatıon Stiffness Scıatıc Nerve Nonspecific Low Back Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

A prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blinded study
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors
The investigator did not collect pre-and post- neuromobilization techniques data and the patients were not aware of whether they had been allocated to tension or sliding group. Participants' evaluation and interventions were performed by different investigator. Participants were trained at different places.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Study Group One

Sciatic nerve neuromobilization techniques (tension) was applied to the dominant side lower extremities of all participants in the study.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sciatic nerve neuromobilization techniques

Intervention Type OTHER

Sciatic nerve neuromobilization techniques (tension and sliding) was applied to the dominant side lower extremities of all participants in the study. While the participant was trying to bring her chin closer to her chest by flexing her head and neck, she simultaneously brought her foot to dorsiflexion. After waiting 30 seconds in this tense position, the ankle, head and neck returned to neutral position and relaxed. 3 sets were repeated with 1 minute rest breaks. Sciatic nerve sliding was applied in the same starting position as tension. While the participants was trying to bring her chin closer to her chest by flexing her head and neck, she simultaneously brought her foot to plantar flexion.

Study Group Two

Sciatic nerve neuromobilization techniques (sliding) was applied to the dominant side lower extremities of all participants in the study.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sciatic nerve neuromobilization techniques

Intervention Type OTHER

Sciatic nerve neuromobilization techniques (tension and sliding) was applied to the dominant side lower extremities of all participants in the study. While the participant was trying to bring her chin closer to her chest by flexing her head and neck, she simultaneously brought her foot to dorsiflexion. After waiting 30 seconds in this tense position, the ankle, head and neck returned to neutral position and relaxed. 3 sets were repeated with 1 minute rest breaks. Sciatic nerve sliding was applied in the same starting position as tension. While the participants was trying to bring her chin closer to her chest by flexing her head and neck, she simultaneously brought her foot to plantar flexion.

Control Group

No application was applied to the sham group

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sciatic nerve neuromobilization techniques

Intervention Type OTHER

Sciatic nerve neuromobilization techniques (tension and sliding) was applied to the dominant side lower extremities of all participants in the study. While the participant was trying to bring her chin closer to her chest by flexing her head and neck, she simultaneously brought her foot to dorsiflexion. After waiting 30 seconds in this tense position, the ankle, head and neck returned to neutral position and relaxed. 3 sets were repeated with 1 minute rest breaks. Sciatic nerve sliding was applied in the same starting position as tension. While the participants was trying to bring her chin closer to her chest by flexing her head and neck, she simultaneously brought her foot to plantar flexion.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sciatic nerve neuromobilization techniques

Sciatic nerve neuromobilization techniques (tension and sliding) was applied to the dominant side lower extremities of all participants in the study. While the participant was trying to bring her chin closer to her chest by flexing her head and neck, she simultaneously brought her foot to dorsiflexion. After waiting 30 seconds in this tense position, the ankle, head and neck returned to neutral position and relaxed. 3 sets were repeated with 1 minute rest breaks. Sciatic nerve sliding was applied in the same starting position as tension. While the participants was trying to bring her chin closer to her chest by flexing her head and neck, she simultaneously brought her foot to plantar flexion.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Diagnosis of nonspecific LBP Having pain for at least 3 months

Exclusion Criteria

Obesity Pregnancy Specific disorders of the lumbar spine such as disc problems Spinal stenosis Having indication for surgery Any recent or old significant trauma of the lumbar region Any systemic inflammatory disease Having neurological problems Any forms of physiotherapy within 6 months before the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

64 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Istinye University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Yunus Emre Tutuneken

Lecturer

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Istinye University

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

6

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.