Iliopsoas Counterstrain and Mechanical Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT ID: NCT06748859
Last Updated: 2025-03-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
36 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-12-25
2025-03-05
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In the control group, consisting of 16 participants, 4 general exercises aimed at relieving back pain will be performed under the physical therapist's supervision. In the treatment group, also comprising 16 participants, after performing the exercises applied to the control group, the SCS technique will be applied to the tender points in the iliopsoas muscle: 90 seconds in a position of comfort, with 30-second intervals, 3 times on the more tender side and 2 times on the less tender side.
The assessment of the cases will use the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain intensity at rest and during lumbar flexion movement as primary outcome measurements TiltMeter© Application for joint range of motion (ROM), Modified Schober's Test (MST) for spinal mobility, Thomas test for iliopsoas muscle length, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for stability, and 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) for health-related quality of life. Assessments will be conducted before treatment, at the end of the 1st session, and at the end of the treatment (after six sessions). Significant results may reduce the burden on the healthcare system with the ease of application and low-cost advantage of the SCS technique, making treatment processes more efficient.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Immediate Effects of Two Spinal Manipulative Techniques
NCT05057091
Thoracolumbar Fascia Flexibility and Trunk Proprioception Relationship With Spinal Posture
NCT07039214
Effect of Strain Counter Strain Technique in Treatment of Lower Back Myofascial Pain Syndrome
NCT06138860
Neuromuscular Inhibition vs Muscle Energy Techniques With Core Exercises in Mechanical Low Back Pain
NCT07258927
Connective Tissue Massage and Core Training in Mechanical Low Back Pain
NCT07193251
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Despite the rising number of patients presenting to hospitals with low back pain, the exact underlying cause is often not well understood. Recent studies suggest that most cases are due to mechanical causes, potentially resulting from improper biomechanical alignment.
The spinal curves, known as lordosis and kyphosis, play a critical role in energy expenditure and mobility from a biomechanical perspective. Improper adaptations and tensions between muscles can lead to either a loss or increase in lumbar lordosis, which can alter biomechanical structure and affect muscle function and range of motion. The psoas major muscle, which attaches to the L1-L5 vertebrae, can also influence lumbar lordosis if it becomes shortened.
Low back pain is typically nonspecific or mechanical. Mechanical chronic low back pain (CLBP) arises from the spine, intervertebral discs, or surrounding soft tissues due to excessive strain or injury. The iliopsoas muscles, deep muscles rarely stretched during daily activities, can become tense and contribute to this pain. As one of the strongest hip flexors, the iliopsoas plays a significant role in pelvic movement and stabilization. Tightness in the iliopsoas is often closely linked to low back pain. A shortened iliopsoas group may result in hyperlordosis, anterior pelvic tilt, and increased pressure on the spinal muscles. If the iliopsoas muscles are excessively tight, they can pull and twist the vertebrae, leading to disc compression and dysfunction, which may manifest as low back pain and discomfort around the sacroiliac joint. Research has found that individuals who work at desks often have shortened iliopsoas muscles, which can predispose them to future low back pain.
Individuals who sit for extended periods, such as sedentary workers and students, are at increased risk of musculoskeletal problems and muscle shortening. Research has shown that sitting for more than eight consecutive hours can lead to low back pain. The iliopsoas muscle, due to its unique connection between the lumbar spine and hip joint, is an important hip flexor affected by prolonged sitting. Biomechanical and electromyography studies suggest that control of the spinal curve is primarily provided by the psoas major muscle. When other muscles become less active, the psoas major becomes more engaged, helping to maintain an upright spine; however, a shortened psoas can lead to pelvic tilt and back pain.
Given the above reasons, many studies have been conducted to address iliopsoas muscle tightness. Research comparing techniques such as Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) and Muscle Energy Technique (MET) for stretching the iliopsoas found that PNF was more effective, emphasizing the benefits of active mobilization and autonomic inhibition. However, muscle tightness can also originate from tender points, which, when addressed, can enhance proprioceptive activity and reduce hypersensitivity once the joint returns to its normal position. Despite the biomechanical importance of the iliopsoas muscle, research specifically focusing on tender points in this muscle remains limited.
Strain-Counterstrain is an osteopathic manipulation technique and the fourth most commonly used soft tissue method after High Velocity Low Amplitude (HVLA) and Muscle Energy Techniques (MET). This technique involves passive positional mobilization designed to alleviate musculoskeletal pain. Strain-Counterstrain helps correct neuromuscular imbalances caused by prolonged muscle stimulation. It is based on the proprioceptive theory, which suggests that this technique can rectify abnormal neuromuscular activity, often caused by sympathetic nervous system responses or inflammatory reactions. Studies have shown that the Strain-Counterstrain technique effectively restores range of motion and reduces pain in the lumbar region. Additionally, it is a low-cost, non-invasive treatment method. For example, a study demonstrated that both SCS and MET were effective in reducing pain and improving functional capacity in patients with chronic low back pain. Other research has reported positive effects on lumbar range of motion, pain, and quality of life when SCS was combined with techniques such as MET or McKenzie.
Most studies have focused on the quadratus lumborum muscle or general SCS techniques, and although the iliopsoas muscle is critically important, it has been less frequently studied in conjunction with SCS. Our study aims to clearly demonstrate the immediate and long-term effects of the iliopsoas-specific SCS technique on lumbar range of motion and pain, ultimately reducing the burden on healthcare systems in terms of labor and cost.
Hypotheses:
Null Hypothesis (H0): The Strain-Counterstrain technique has no positive effect on pain and restricted lumbar flexion in patients with chronic low back pain and limited lumbar flexion.
Alternative Hypothesis (H1): The Strain-Counterstrain technique has a positive effect on pain and restricted lumbar flexion in patients with chronic low back pain and limited lumbar flexion.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Strain-counterstrain technique
Participants in this group will receive strain-counterstrain technique and exercise therapy within two weeks.
Counterstrain technique
In this group, participants will receive counterstrain technique on the Psoas major muscle and exercise training within two weeks.
Exercise therapy
Participants in this group will receive exercise therapy within two weeks.
Exercise therapy
participants who will assign to this group will receive exercise therapy within two weeks.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Counterstrain technique
In this group, participants will receive counterstrain technique on the Psoas major muscle and exercise training within two weeks.
Exercise therapy
participants who will assign to this group will receive exercise therapy within two weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Pain experience more than 12 weeks;
3. Pain intensity ≥ 3 based on Numeric pain scale;
4. Pain experience during lumbar flexion movement;
5. Positive Thomas test;
6. Having tenderness on Psoas major muscle 4 times more than palpation on ipsilateral quadratus lumborum muscle;
7. Able to understand and make communication with research team without any barrier;
8. Having consent to participate the study.
1. Pregnancy;
2. Not indicated for lumbar surgery based on diagnosis of a physical medicine and rehabilitation specialist,
3. Any type of fracture or history of trauma which makes manual therapy contraindicated for the patient,
Exclusion Criteria
2. Progressive deterioration during the study and intervention application.
18 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Marmara University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Javad Hassanzadeh
MSc. candidate of physiotherapy
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Marmara University Institute of Health Sciences
Kartal, Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Fernandes WVB, Blanco CR, Politti F, de Cordoba Lanza F, Lucareli PRG, Correa JCF. The effect of a six-week osteopathic visceral manipulation in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain and functional constipation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2018 Mar 2;19(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2532-8.
Santos GK, Goncalves de Oliveira R, Campos de Oliveira L, Ferreira C de Oliveira C, Andraus RA, Ngomo S, Fusco A, Cortis C, DA Silva RA. Effectiveness of muscle energy technique in patients with nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2022 Dec;58(6):827-837. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.22.07424-X. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
Maharty DC, Hines SC, Brown RB. Chronic Low Back Pain in Adults: Evaluation and Management. Am Fam Physician. 2024 Mar;109(3):233-244.
Chun SW, Lim CY, Kim K, Hwang J, Chung SG. The relationships between low back pain and lumbar lordosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine J. 2017 Aug;17(8):1180-1191. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.04.034. Epub 2017 May 2.
Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C, Hildebrandt J, Klaber-Moffett J, Kovacs F, Mannion AF, Reis S, Staal JB, Ursin H, Zanoli G; COST B13 Working Group on Guidelines for Chronic Low Back Pain. Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2006 Mar;15 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S192-300. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-1072-1. No abstract available.
Park MW, Park SJ, Chung SG. Relationships Between Skeletal Muscle Mass, Lumbar Lordosis, and Chronic Low Back Pain in the Elderly. Neurospine. 2023 Sep;20(3):959-968. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346494.247. Epub 2023 Sep 30.
Jorgensson A. The iliopsoas muscle and the lumbar spine. Aust J Physiother. 1993;39(2):125-32. doi: 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60477-3.
Lakkadsha TM, Qureshi MI, Kovela RK, Saifee SS, Lalwani SS. Efficacy of Single Stretching Session of Iliopsoas Using Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Versus Muscle Energy Technique on Low Back Pain in Patients With Lumbar Hyper-Lordosis. Cureus. 2022 Aug 12;14(8):e27916. doi: 10.7759/cureus.27916. eCollection 2022 Aug.
Lifshitz L, Bar Sela S, Gal N, Martin R, Fleitman Klar M. Iliopsoas the Hidden Muscle: Anatomy, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2020 Jun;19(6):235-243. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0000000000000723.
Siglan U, Colak S. Effects of diaphragmatic and iliopsoas myofascial release in patients with chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled study. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2023 Jan;33:120-127. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2022.09.029. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
Tanigawa MC. Comparison of the hold-relax procedure and passive mobilization on increasing muscle length. Phys Ther. 1972 Jul;52(7):725-35. doi: 10.1093/ptj/52.7.725. No abstract available.
Ashrafi A, Arab AM, Abdi S, Nourbakhsh MR. The association between myofascial trigger points and the incidence of chronic functional constipation. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2021 Apr;26:201-206. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.12.004. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
Wong CK. Strain counterstrain: current concepts and clinical evidence. Man Ther. 2012 Feb;17(1):2-8. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2011.10.001. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
Patel VD, Eapen C, Ceepee Z, Kamath R. Effect of muscle energy technique with and without strain-counterstrain technique in acute low back pain - A randomized clinical trial. Hong Kong Physiother J. 2018 Jun;38(1):41-51. doi: 10.1142/S1013702518500051. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2024/44-53
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.