The Effects of Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization Exercises in Addition to Conventional Treatment on Functional Capacity, Core Stabilization Muscle Strength, and Balance in Female Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain

NCT ID: NCT07199842

Last Updated: 2025-09-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

44 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-02-12

Study Completion Date

2025-07-08

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Low back pain, which is currently considered a public health problem, is commonly encountered. A significant proportion of low back pain cases is of mechanical origin. "Lumbar discopathy" is a general term used to describe conditions such as Lumbar Discopathy, Lumbar Disc Herniation, Lumbosacral Radiculopathy, and internal disc injury. There are various treatment approaches available for the management of lumbar discopathy in individuals presenting with low back pain. The therapeutic effectiveness of conventional exercise in alleviating low back pain has been well-documented in the literature, and research continues on the impact of different types of exercise on low back pain. One such approach is Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization (DNS), which aims to restore the integrated spinal stabilization system through specific functional exercises based on the developmental kinesiological positions of a healthy infant. The DNS perspective holds that each developmental position represents an exercise position. With repetition, these exercises promote the formation of an automatic pattern of central control that becomes a fundamental component of daily movements and skills. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of conventional physiotherapy protocols and DNS exercises applied in addition to these protocols on functional capacity, the force-generating ability of core stabilization muscles, static and dynamic balance, low back pain and lumbar functionality, and quality of life in female patients diagnosed with Lumbar Disc Herniation and experiencing chronic pain. In this study, the control group received a conventional physiotherapy program for 8 weeks, 4 days per week. The intervention group received the same conventional program plus Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization exercises. Outcome measures included the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), core muscle strength assessment, Flamingo Balance Test, Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT), Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), all of which were administered before and after the treatment. As a result, statistically significant differences were observed in both the control and intervention groups when comparing pre- and post-treatment values in the NPRS, 6MWT, ODI, IPAQ, SEBT, Flamingo Balance Test, and core strength as measured by a pressure biofeedback unit. Furthermore, statistically significant differences in NPRS, ODI, and pressure biofeedback results were found in favor of the intervention group when comparing between groups. Keywords: Low back pain, DNS, Developmental Kinesiology

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Low Back Pain, Mechanical, Biofeedback, Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Low back pain, dynamic neuromuscular stabilization exercise

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

randomized controlled trial
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

study group-DNS

DNS

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization Exercises in Addition to Conventional Treatment

Intervention Type OTHER

Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization Exercises in Addition to Conventional Treatment

control group-Placebo

Placebo

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization Exercises in Addition to Conventional Treatment

Dynamic Neuromuscular Stabilization Exercises in Addition to Conventional Treatment

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients aged between 20 and 65 years,
* Who volunteered to participate in the study,
* Had been diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation (LDH),
* Reported a pain intensity of at least 3 on the 0-10 cm Numeric Pain Rating Scale,
* And had no specific findings such as radiculopathy or leg pain originating from LDH

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with a history of spinal surgery,
* Serious spinal pathologies and neurological deficits with medical contraindications to active exercise,
* A diagnosis of cancer or cooperation problems
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Safiye Esin

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Safiye Esin

Fzt.Safiye Esin

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

gözde başbuğ, Dr. Öğr. Üyesi

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Istanbul Aydın University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

İstanbul Aydın University

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

28/25

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id