Lumbar School Training or Core Stabilization Exercises on Pain, Mobilization and Quality of Life Low Back Pain
NCT ID: NCT06203340
Last Updated: 2025-01-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
72 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-01-02
2024-09-07
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In this research, patients coming to Seydişehir State Hospital physiotherapy unit will be included in the study. Patients will be taken in Seydişehir Vocational School of Health Services Vocational School vocational skills laboratory and Seydişehir State Hospital physiotherapy unit. As a result of the power analysis, 64 patients are planned to be included. Simple randomisation will be used. Sealed opaque envelopes will be prepared by the research team. Opaque envelopes will be determined as 24 (core exercise group) and 24 (B) (lumbar school), 24 C kontrol. The pain intensity of the patients will be determined by the Visual Analogue Scale, which is a self-report scale, and the functional disability levels will be determined by the Oswestry Disability Index and the quality of life levels will be determined by the World Health Organization Quality of Life Module (WHOQOL-BREF) and spinal mobility will be determined by measuring the hand-finger ground distance.
Patients will be divided into two groups as core exercise group and lumbar school training group and will be evaluated before and after treatment and training.
Keywords: Chronic low back pain, back school, core stabilisation exercise
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Core Stabilization Exercises in People With Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT05302349
Investigation of the Effect of Different Intensity Stabilization Exercises on Core Muscles
NCT06227767
The Effect of Core Stabilization Exercises on Balance and Quality of Life in Chronic Period in Individuals With Lumbar Disc Herniation
NCT05634330
Effects of Vertebral Axial Loading Walking Combined With Core Stabilization Exercises in Individuals With Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT07334782
Investigation of the Acute Effects of Core Stabilization and 360-Degree Breathing Exercises on Balance and Proprioception in Individuals With Non-Specific Low Back Pain
NCT06943898
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Between 70-85% of people experience low back pain throughout their lives. Almost 20% of these cases become permanent (2). Chronic low back pain (CLBP) is defined as low back pain lasting longer than three months. It is a worldwide common disease that imposes a significant medical and economic burden on individuals and society (3). Mechanical low back pain is defined as a clinical picture that develops as a result of overuse, strain or traumatisation or deformation of the structures forming the spine. In order to define low back pain as mechanical, all organic causes such as inflammatory, infectious, tumoural, metabolic causes, fractures and pain reflected from internal organs should be excluded (4).
It is very important that CLBP, which is very common in the society and is one of the most expensive diseases in terms of both labour loss and treatment cost, is treated with conventional (non-surgical) treatment methods (7). It has been reported that medical, psychological, physical approaches and multidisciplinary methods are effective in the treatment of CLBP(13). In the last thirty years, changes have been made in the basic recommendations in clinical practice guidelines. Self-management, physical, psychological therapies and some complementary medicine treatments are now given more importance and pharmacological and surgical treatments are less preferred. Guidelines recommend active treatments that address psychosocial factors and focus on functional recovery (14). Within this approach, waist protection training, which is called waist school, is accepted as an effective and economical method (5).
The lumbar school method was developed by Mariane Zachrisson Forssel in Sweden in 1969 with the aim of managing the patient's current condition and preventing recurrent low back pain (6). The programme consists of 4 sessions lasting approximately 45 minutes and each session is organised with theoretical components and includes exercises to improve mobility (5). Standard training strategies can be used in patients with chronic low back pain. However, it is not sufficient as a treatment alone. Standard training strategies should include exercise-related practices (7). Clinical guidelines state that trunk coordination, strengthening and endurance exercises should be utilised to reduce the disability in CLBP (7,8). Various therapeutic exercises are applied in clinical practice for CBLP patients.
Core stabilisation exercises (CSE) are based on a motor learning approach and provide the activation of the transversus abdominis and lumbar multifidus muscles together. These deep stabilisation muscles increase intra-abdominal pressure by adhering to the thoraco-lumbar fascia. It has a firming effect on the lumbar spine. It increases the segmental stability of the spine (9). In addition, CSE reduces pain by reversing the pain-related structuring in the motor cortex. It improves muscle strength and improves neuromuscular control of spinal stability. CSE increases the sense of proprioception and successfully corrects postural disorders (10).
Although many different interventions are widely used in physiotherapy clinics, there are few studies evaluating the effects of lumbar school and CSE, and no studies comparing their effectiveness with each other have been found. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the comparative efficacy of lumbar school training or core stabilisation exercises on pain, mobilisation and quality of life in patients with CBLP.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Lumbar school training
Lumbar back school is a programme for patient groups that provides information about the anatomy, biomechanics, optimal posture, ergonomics and lumbar exercises.
The aim of the lumbar lumbar school school is to reduce low back pain and to teach the individual to take care of his lumbar. It is applied to increase the skills of individuals to solve the problems they encounter in daily life and to teach them ways of coping. Assessment of the patient, explanation of the anatomy, functions and pathophysiology of low back pain, appropriate posture, use of correct body mechanics and theoretical explanation of exercise.
Core stabilizasyon and lumbal back school
Lumbal back schooL
Core stabilisation training
Core exercise programmes are designed to improve stabilisation, strength and power. Core exercise programmes are aimed to improve the sense of bodily movement and position (proprioception), which systematically progresses, prepares for activities and goals. Patients are started from the beginning level of the core exercises and in the following weeks, to the extent that the patients can do will be made more difficult.
Core stabilizasyon and lumbal back school
Lumbal back schooL
Control group
Patients with a previous diagnosis of pain in the lumbar region will be sought. Patients will be invited to the institution and will be informed about low back pain. Patients with low back pain will be evaluated with self-report scales and functional tests. No treatment will be applied as a treatment.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Core stabilizasyon and lumbal back school
Lumbal back schooL
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Having low back pain for at least 3 months (12 hf),
* Score 14% or more on the Oswestry Disability Index,
* Ability to move independently (with or without assistance), to participate in a rehabilitation program and to read, write and understand Turkish well enough to complete questionnaires independently.
Exclusion Criteria
* Those with cognitive impairment that prevents them from understanding and completing the questionnaire,
* Aphasic patients, patients unwilling to volunteer, patients with specific etiology of low back pain such as inflammatory, infectious, tumoral, fracture and visceral pain.
18 Years
55 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Necmettin Erbakan University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
MUSA ÇANKAYA
Lecturer Doctor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Havva CİNGÖZ, M.Dr.
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Seydişehir Devlet Hastanesi (Seydişehir/KONYA
Musa Çankaya, Pt. PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Necmettin Erbakan University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Musa Çankaya
Konya, Konya, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ozsoy G, Ilcin N, Ozsoy I, Gurpinar B, Buyukturan O, Buyukturan B, Kararti C, Sas S. The Effects Of Myofascial Release Technique Combined With Core Stabilization Exercise In Elderly With Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled, Single-Blind Study. Clin Interv Aging. 2019 Oct 9;14:1729-1740. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S223905. eCollection 2019.
Ghaderi Niri H, Ghanavati T, Mostafaee N, Salahzadeh Z, Divandari A, Adigozali H, Ahadi J. Oswestry Disability Index, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: Responsiveness and Minimal Clinically Important Changes in Iranian People with Lumbar Disc Herniation Following Physiotherapy. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2024;12(1):58-65. doi: 10.22038/ABJS.2023.72246.3366.
Alqhtani RS, Ahmed H, Ghulam HSH, Alyami AM, Al Sharyah YHH, Ahmed R, Khan A, Khan AR. Efficacy of Core-Strengthening and Intensive Dynamic Back Exercises on Pain, Core Muscle Endurance, and Functional Disability in Patients with Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Comparative Study. J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 15;13(2):475. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020475.
Jenks A, Hoekstra T, van Tulder M, Ostelo RW, Rubinstein SM, Chiarotto A. Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, Oswestry Disability Index, and Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: Which Has Superior Measurement Properties in Older Adults With Low Back Pain? J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2022 Jul;52(7):457-469. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2022.10802. Epub 2022 May 18.
Rajfur J, Rajfur K, Kosowski L, Walewicz K, Dymarek R, Ptaszkowski K, Taradaj J. The effectiveness of dry needling in patients with chronic low back pain: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded study. Sci Rep. 2022 Sep 22;12(1):15803. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19980-1.
Kleine-Borgmann J, Dietz TN, Schmidt K, Bingel U. No long-term effects after a 3-week open-label placebo treatment for chronic low back pain: a 3-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Pain. 2023 Mar 1;164(3):645-652. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002752. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
Lara-Palomo IC, Gil-Martinez E, Antequera-Soler E, Castro-Sanchez AM, Fernandez-Sanchez M, Garcia-Lopez H. Electrical dry needling versus conventional physiotherapy in the treatment of active and latent myofascial trigger points in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain. Trials. 2022 Mar 28;23(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06179-y.
Kim B, Yim J. Core Stability and Hip Exercises Improve Physical Function and Activity in Patients with Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2020 Jul;251(3):193-206. doi: 10.1620/tjem.251.193.
Minghelli B, Nunes C, Oliveira R. Back School Postural Education Program: Comparison of Two Types of Interventions in Improving Ergonomic Knowledge about Postures and Reducing Low Back Pain in Adolescents. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 22;18(9):4434. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094434.
Ahmadi H, Adib H, Selk-Ghaffari M, Shafizad M, Moradi S, Madani Z, Partovi G, Mahmoodi A. Comparison of the effects of the Feldenkrais method versus core stability exercise in the management of chronic low back pain: a randomised control trial. Clin Rehabil. 2020 Dec;34(12):1449-1457. doi: 10.1177/0269215520947069. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
Hajihasani A, Rouhani M, Salavati M, Hedayati R, Kahlaee AH. The Influence of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Pain, Quality of Life, and Depression in Patients Receiving Physical Therapy for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review. PM R. 2019 Feb;11(2):167-176. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.09.029. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MUSACANKAYA
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.