Different Physiotherapy Interventions on Chronic Low Back Pain

NCT ID: NCT03493438

Last Updated: 2020-07-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

31 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-03-26

Study Completion Date

2018-06-26

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Low back pain is an extremely common health problem that most people suffers at any point in their life. Low back pain is the leading cause of activity limitation and work absence throughout much of the world and it causes some economic problems for just not only individuals but also governments. ) The purpose of the study was to investigate the effects of different physical therapy techniques on pain, function and core stability in patients with low back pain.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Low back pain is an extremely common health problem that most people suffers at any point in their life. Low back pain is the leading cause of activity limitation and work absence throughout much of the world and it causes some economic problems for just not only individuals but also governments. Low back pain is a symptom rather than a disease. Non-specific low back pain term is used when the pathoanatomical cause of the pain cannot be determined. Most patients had pain that caused interference with daily function. Low back pain can be triggered by physical factors (eg, lifting awkwardly) or psychosocial factors (eg, being fatigued or tired), or by a combination of the two (eg, being distracted while lifting). There are several nonpharmacologic treatment options that include analgesics, muscle relaxants, physical therapy modalities, spinal manipulative therapy, psychological therapies and others for back pain. Unfortunately, none of the therapies has been established as superior to others. Controversly some of the investigators suggest individuals with chronic LBP can more benefit from exercise therapy interventions but still evidence on the effectiveness of nonpharmacologic therapies was very limited. The purpose of the study was to investigate the effects of different physical therapy techniques on pain, function and core stability in patients with low back pain.

Female patients with chronic, nonspecific LBP who were either undergoing or initiating physical therapy treatment at the Baskent University Ankara Hospital Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation outpatient clinic participated in the study.

Before the study began patients were randomized into four groups: Relaxation, Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF), core stability and control groups.

Descriptive characteristic of patients was evaluated at the beginning of the study. Pain, functionality, kinesiophobia and core stability was evaluated before and after the treatments. Pain and functionality were the primer outcome measures of this study, kinesiophobia, core stability and satisfaction were seconder. Patient satisfaction was assessed after the treatments.

A hot pack and conventional transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) will be applied with a Chattanoga Intelect® stimulator for 20 minutes at a frequency of 100 Hz and a transition time of 60 μs. The duration of application was 3 days per week and six weeks for each of the four groups. These practices were also applied to individuals in all four groups.

The program was involved one of the following techniques of relaxation: proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation: core stability or control. At the end of the treatments, the individuals in each group were given exercise as home brochure.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Exercise Training

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized controled clinical trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Relaxation Group

Patients performed Jacobson relaxation technique in supine position. Respiration control and various visual imaging techniques were used during the technique. Relaxation exercises were made within the supervision of a physiotherapist. The application period was 20 minutes for one session, 3 days a week and totally six weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

exercise

Intervention Type OTHER

A hot pack and conventional transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) will be applied with a Chattanoga Intelect® stimulator for 20 minutes at a frequency of 100 Hz and a transition time of 60 μs. The duration of application was 3 days per week and six weeks for each of the four groups. These practices were also applied to individuals in all four groups.

Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Group

Patients exercised with proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation technique for trunk muscles using chopping and lifting patterns with ritmic initiation PNF exercises were made by the physiotherapist. The application period was 20 minutes for one session, 3 days a week and totally six weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

exercise

Intervention Type OTHER

A hot pack and conventional transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) will be applied with a Chattanoga Intelect® stimulator for 20 minutes at a frequency of 100 Hz and a transition time of 60 μs. The duration of application was 3 days per week and six weeks for each of the four groups. These practices were also applied to individuals in all four groups.

Core stabilization group

Patients had core stabilization exercises that involved spinal mobility. The patients performed the drawing-in maneuver within various visual imaging techniques during all exercises, especially with respiratory control. Exercises were made within the supervision of a physiotherapist. The application period was 20 minutes for one session, 3 days a week and totally six weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

exercise

Intervention Type OTHER

A hot pack and conventional transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) will be applied with a Chattanoga Intelect® stimulator for 20 minutes at a frequency of 100 Hz and a transition time of 60 μs. The duration of application was 3 days per week and six weeks for each of the four groups. These practices were also applied to individuals in all four groups.

control group

Patients in the control group were told the importance of a single session exercise

Group Type OTHER

exercise

Intervention Type OTHER

A hot pack and conventional transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) will be applied with a Chattanoga Intelect® stimulator for 20 minutes at a frequency of 100 Hz and a transition time of 60 μs. The duration of application was 3 days per week and six weeks for each of the four groups. These practices were also applied to individuals in all four groups.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

exercise

A hot pack and conventional transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) will be applied with a Chattanoga Intelect® stimulator for 20 minutes at a frequency of 100 Hz and a transition time of 60 μs. The duration of application was 3 days per week and six weeks for each of the four groups. These practices were also applied to individuals in all four groups.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

A hot pack, conventional transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) and exersice

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients had to have LBP for at least 3 months,
2. Patients who reported osteoarthritis or disk lesions (without neurologic compromise) with or without leg pain,
3. Patients between 18 and 65 years of age,

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients were excluded if they demonstrated any of the following;

1. They had neurologic signs, specific spinal pathology (eg, malignancy, inflammatory joint disease, bone disease),
2. They had undergone back and lower extremity surgery.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Baskent University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

aydan aytar

ASSOC. PROF.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Baskent University

Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KA 18/27

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Activity Management Training in Low Back Pain
NCT07061743 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA