Different Physiotherapy Interventions on Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT ID: NCT03493438
Last Updated: 2020-07-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
31 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-03-26
2018-06-26
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Long-Term Continuity of Exercises in Low Back Pain Individuals
NCT04824547
The Effect of Manual Therapy and Exercise in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT02696057
Investigation of the Effects of Two Different Treatment Programs on Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT04643756
The Effect of Core Stabilization Exercises in People With Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT05302349
Remote Exercise Programs in Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT05082649
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Female patients with chronic, nonspecific LBP who were either undergoing or initiating physical therapy treatment at the Baskent University Ankara Hospital Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation outpatient clinic participated in the study.
Before the study began patients were randomized into four groups: Relaxation, Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF), core stability and control groups.
Descriptive characteristic of patients was evaluated at the beginning of the study. Pain, functionality, kinesiophobia and core stability was evaluated before and after the treatments. Pain and functionality were the primer outcome measures of this study, kinesiophobia, core stability and satisfaction were seconder. Patient satisfaction was assessed after the treatments.
A hot pack and conventional transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) will be applied with a Chattanoga Intelect® stimulator for 20 minutes at a frequency of 100 Hz and a transition time of 60 μs. The duration of application was 3 days per week and six weeks for each of the four groups. These practices were also applied to individuals in all four groups.
The program was involved one of the following techniques of relaxation: proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation: core stability or control. At the end of the treatments, the individuals in each group were given exercise as home brochure.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Relaxation Group
Patients performed Jacobson relaxation technique in supine position. Respiration control and various visual imaging techniques were used during the technique. Relaxation exercises were made within the supervision of a physiotherapist. The application period was 20 minutes for one session, 3 days a week and totally six weeks.
exercise
A hot pack and conventional transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) will be applied with a Chattanoga Intelect® stimulator for 20 minutes at a frequency of 100 Hz and a transition time of 60 μs. The duration of application was 3 days per week and six weeks for each of the four groups. These practices were also applied to individuals in all four groups.
Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Group
Patients exercised with proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation technique for trunk muscles using chopping and lifting patterns with ritmic initiation PNF exercises were made by the physiotherapist. The application period was 20 minutes for one session, 3 days a week and totally six weeks.
exercise
A hot pack and conventional transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) will be applied with a Chattanoga Intelect® stimulator for 20 minutes at a frequency of 100 Hz and a transition time of 60 μs. The duration of application was 3 days per week and six weeks for each of the four groups. These practices were also applied to individuals in all four groups.
Core stabilization group
Patients had core stabilization exercises that involved spinal mobility. The patients performed the drawing-in maneuver within various visual imaging techniques during all exercises, especially with respiratory control. Exercises were made within the supervision of a physiotherapist. The application period was 20 minutes for one session, 3 days a week and totally six weeks.
exercise
A hot pack and conventional transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) will be applied with a Chattanoga Intelect® stimulator for 20 minutes at a frequency of 100 Hz and a transition time of 60 μs. The duration of application was 3 days per week and six weeks for each of the four groups. These practices were also applied to individuals in all four groups.
control group
Patients in the control group were told the importance of a single session exercise
exercise
A hot pack and conventional transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) will be applied with a Chattanoga Intelect® stimulator for 20 minutes at a frequency of 100 Hz and a transition time of 60 μs. The duration of application was 3 days per week and six weeks for each of the four groups. These practices were also applied to individuals in all four groups.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
exercise
A hot pack and conventional transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS) will be applied with a Chattanoga Intelect® stimulator for 20 minutes at a frequency of 100 Hz and a transition time of 60 μs. The duration of application was 3 days per week and six weeks for each of the four groups. These practices were also applied to individuals in all four groups.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients who reported osteoarthritis or disk lesions (without neurologic compromise) with or without leg pain,
3. Patients between 18 and 65 years of age,
Exclusion Criteria
1. They had neurologic signs, specific spinal pathology (eg, malignancy, inflammatory joint disease, bone disease),
2. They had undergone back and lower extremity surgery.
18 Years
65 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Baskent University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
aydan aytar
ASSOC. PROF.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Baskent University
Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KA 18/27
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.