Cooled RFA vs Conventional RFA to Manage Chronic Facetogenic Low Back Pain
NCT ID: NCT04803149
Last Updated: 2022-06-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
79 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-02-23
2023-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Selection of Chronic Low Back Pain Patients for Neurotomy Surgery Radiofrequency
NCT05624307
Monopolar Dielectric Diathermy by Radiofrequency and Therapeutic Exercise in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.
NCT05149690
Radiofrequency Denervation and Brain Imaging
NCT05641948
Cryoneurolysis Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT06804551
EuroPainClinicsStudy XI (Cryo vs RF MB Z Joints)
NCT04684303
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cooled Radiofrequency
Cooled radiofrequency energy will be delivered to target medial branch nerves in the lower back to reduce pain
Cooled Radiofrequency
Delivery of energy to ablate sensory nerves via cooled radiofrequency probe
Conventional Radiofrequency
Conventional radiofrequency energy will be delivered to target medial branch nerves in the lower back to reduce pain
Conventional Radiofrequency
Delivery of energy to ablate sensory nerves via standard or conventional radiofrequency probe
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cooled Radiofrequency
Delivery of energy to ablate sensory nerves via cooled radiofrequency probe
Conventional Radiofrequency
Delivery of energy to ablate sensory nerves via standard or conventional radiofrequency probe
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Able to understand the informed consent form and provide written informed consent and able to complete outcome measures.
3. Subjects who have chronic axial (non-radicular) low back pain (at least 3 months) attributed to bilateral L4/L5, L5/S1 lumbar facet joint arthropathy based on clinical evaluation (paraspinal tenderness in the absence of signs and symptoms suggestive of focal neurological deficits) despite conservative treatments, including activity modification, home exercise, protective weight bearing, and/or analgesics (for example, acetaminophen or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs \[NSAIDs\]).
4. Positive response to dual diagnostic medial branch blocks (defined as a decrease in numeric pain scores of at least 80% for a min of 3 hours for bupivacaine and minimum of 2 hours for lidocaine) using 0.5mL or less of 0.5% bupivacaine and 2% lidocaine, on respective encounters on separate days, at each of the appropriate medial branches.
5. Usual/Average Pain ≥ 6 on an 11-point NRS scale.
6. Analgesics including membrane stabilizers such as Neurontin (gabapentin) and antidepressants for pain, such as Cymbalta (duloxetine), must be clinically stable (defined as stable dosage for ≥ 6 weeks prior to the screening visit) and shall not change during the study without approval of the investigator.
7. Agree to see one physician (study physician) for back pain during the study period.
8. Subjects of child bearing potential must be willing to utilize double barrier contraceptive method for duration of participation.
9. Willingness to comply with the requirements of this protocol for the full duration of the study.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Focal neurologic signs or symptoms.
3. Spinal pathology that may impede recovery such as spina bifida occulta, grade II or higher spondylolisthesis at an affected joint or adjacent level, or significant lumbar scoliosis (sagittal vertical axis angle \>5 degrees or Cobb Angle \>10 degrees).
4. Suspected mechanical instability based on flexion/extension and/or films at the proposed treatment levels
5. History of prior lumbar fusion or previous lumbar back surgery at the intended treatment levels.
6. Progressive motor deficit, and/or clinical signs of cauda equina or polyradiculopathy.
7. Radiologic evidence of a symptomatic herniated disc or nerve root impingement.
8. Symptomatic moderate or severe foramina or central canal stenosis demonstrating radicular symptoms or neurogenic claudication.
9. Evidence of neuropathic pain affecting the lower back.
10. Intra-articular steroid injection at target levels within 90 days from randomization.
11. Platelet rich plasma (PRP) or stem cells at target levels within 180 days from randomization.
12. Prior lumbar radiofrequency neurotomy of the L3/L4, L4/L5 medial branches and/or L5/S1dorsal ramus.
13. Body mass index (BMI) \> 40 kg/m2
14. Extremely thin patients and those with minimal subcutaneous tissue thickness that would not accommodate a radiofrequency lesion of up to 14 mm in diameter to limit the risk of skin burns.
15. Active joint infection or systemic or localized infection at needle entry sites (subject may be considered for inclusion once infection is resolved).
16. Pending or active compensation claim, litigation, or disability remuneration (e.g. disability, worker's compensation, auto injury in litigation or pending litigation).
17. Pregnant, nursing or intent of becoming pregnant during the study period
18. Chronic pain associated with significant psychosocial dysfunction.
19. Poorly controlled severe psychiatric illness or ongoing psychological barriers to recovery, as determined by the investigator.
20. Allergies to any of the medications to be used during the procedures
21. History of uncontrolled coagulopathy, ongoing coagulation treatment that cannot be safely interrupted for procedure, or unexplained or uncontrollable bleeding that is uncorrectable.
22. Identifiable anatomical variability that would materially alter the procedure as described in the protocol.
23. Within the preceding 2 years, subject has suffered from active narcotic addiction, substance, or alcohol abuse.
24. Current prescribed opioid medications greater than 50 morphine equivalent daily opioid dose.
25. Uncontrolled immunosuppression (e.g. AIDS, cancer, diabetes, etc.).
26. Subject currently implanted with pacemaker, stimulator or defibrillator.
27. Participating in another clinical trial/investigation which included therapeutic treatment within 30 days prior to signing informed consent.
28. Subject unwilling or unable to comply with follow up schedule, protocol requirements or procedures.
21 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Avanos Medical
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David Provenzano
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Pain Diagnostics and Interventional Care
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
International Spine & Pain Performance Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Millennium Pain Center
Bloomington, Illinois, United States
Ochsner Baptist Medical Center
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Premier Pain Centers
Shrewsbury, New Jersey, United States
The Center for Clinical Research
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
University Orthopedics Center
Altoona, Pennsylvania, United States
Pain Diagnostics and Interventional Care
Sewickley, Pennsylvania, United States
University Orthopedics Center
State College, Pennsylvania, United States
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
The Spine and Nerve Centers of St. Francis Hosptial
Charleston, West Virginia, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
105-20-0006
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.