Cooled RFA vs Conventional RFA to Manage Chronic Facetogenic Low Back Pain

NCT ID: NCT04803149

Last Updated: 2022-06-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

79 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-02-23

Study Completion Date

2023-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is being conducted to assess the relative effectiveness of radiofrequency neurotomy in subjects with chronic axial low back pain originating in the lumbar facet joints using the COOLIEF\* Cooled Radiofrequency Probe as compared to the same procedure conducted using a Standard Radiofrequency Probe.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a prospective, multi-center, randomized, single-blind comparison study examining the outcomes of subjects with chronic axial low back pain that originates in the lumbar facet joints undergoing a procedure to create a radiofrequency lesion in the medial branch nerves with either Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation (CRFA) or Conventional (Standard) Radiofrequency Ablation (SRFA). Approximately 188 participants from approximately 15 sites will be enrolled into this study, with subjects undergoing either CRFA or SRFA in a 1:1 randomization scheme. Follow-up will be conducted for 12 months post-treatment, with the primary endpoint being completed at month 6. Pain, overall outcome, quality of life, pain medication use, and adverse events will be compared between the two treatment groups to determine success.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Low-back Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
The study is a participant-blinded trial and deliberate action, utilizing a physical barrier, will be taken to ensure the blind remains intact.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Cooled Radiofrequency

Cooled radiofrequency energy will be delivered to target medial branch nerves in the lower back to reduce pain

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cooled Radiofrequency

Intervention Type DEVICE

Delivery of energy to ablate sensory nerves via cooled radiofrequency probe

Conventional Radiofrequency

Conventional radiofrequency energy will be delivered to target medial branch nerves in the lower back to reduce pain

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional Radiofrequency

Intervention Type DEVICE

Delivery of energy to ablate sensory nerves via standard or conventional radiofrequency probe

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cooled Radiofrequency

Delivery of energy to ablate sensory nerves via cooled radiofrequency probe

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional Radiofrequency

Delivery of energy to ablate sensory nerves via standard or conventional radiofrequency probe

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Coolief Standard Radiofrequency

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age ≥ 21 years
2. Able to understand the informed consent form and provide written informed consent and able to complete outcome measures.
3. Subjects who have chronic axial (non-radicular) low back pain (at least 3 months) attributed to bilateral L4/L5, L5/S1 lumbar facet joint arthropathy based on clinical evaluation (paraspinal tenderness in the absence of signs and symptoms suggestive of focal neurological deficits) despite conservative treatments, including activity modification, home exercise, protective weight bearing, and/or analgesics (for example, acetaminophen or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs \[NSAIDs\]).
4. Positive response to dual diagnostic medial branch blocks (defined as a decrease in numeric pain scores of at least 80% for a min of 3 hours for bupivacaine and minimum of 2 hours for lidocaine) using 0.5mL or less of 0.5% bupivacaine and 2% lidocaine, on respective encounters on separate days, at each of the appropriate medial branches.
5. Usual/Average Pain ≥ 6 on an 11-point NRS scale.
6. Analgesics including membrane stabilizers such as Neurontin (gabapentin) and antidepressants for pain, such as Cymbalta (duloxetine), must be clinically stable (defined as stable dosage for ≥ 6 weeks prior to the screening visit) and shall not change during the study without approval of the investigator.
7. Agree to see one physician (study physician) for back pain during the study period.
8. Subjects of child bearing potential must be willing to utilize double barrier contraceptive method for duration of participation.
9. Willingness to comply with the requirements of this protocol for the full duration of the study.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Evidence of inflammatory arthritis (example, rheumatoid arthritis) or other systemic condition (example; gout, fibromyalgia, MS, Lupus, etc.) that could cause pain.
2. Focal neurologic signs or symptoms.
3. Spinal pathology that may impede recovery such as spina bifida occulta, grade II or higher spondylolisthesis at an affected joint or adjacent level, or significant lumbar scoliosis (sagittal vertical axis angle \>5 degrees or Cobb Angle \>10 degrees).
4. Suspected mechanical instability based on flexion/extension and/or films at the proposed treatment levels
5. History of prior lumbar fusion or previous lumbar back surgery at the intended treatment levels.
6. Progressive motor deficit, and/or clinical signs of cauda equina or polyradiculopathy.
7. Radiologic evidence of a symptomatic herniated disc or nerve root impingement.
8. Symptomatic moderate or severe foramina or central canal stenosis demonstrating radicular symptoms or neurogenic claudication.
9. Evidence of neuropathic pain affecting the lower back.
10. Intra-articular steroid injection at target levels within 90 days from randomization.
11. Platelet rich plasma (PRP) or stem cells at target levels within 180 days from randomization.
12. Prior lumbar radiofrequency neurotomy of the L3/L4, L4/L5 medial branches and/or L5/S1dorsal ramus.
13. Body mass index (BMI) \> 40 kg/m2
14. Extremely thin patients and those with minimal subcutaneous tissue thickness that would not accommodate a radiofrequency lesion of up to 14 mm in diameter to limit the risk of skin burns.
15. Active joint infection or systemic or localized infection at needle entry sites (subject may be considered for inclusion once infection is resolved).
16. Pending or active compensation claim, litigation, or disability remuneration (e.g. disability, worker's compensation, auto injury in litigation or pending litigation).
17. Pregnant, nursing or intent of becoming pregnant during the study period
18. Chronic pain associated with significant psychosocial dysfunction.
19. Poorly controlled severe psychiatric illness or ongoing psychological barriers to recovery, as determined by the investigator.
20. Allergies to any of the medications to be used during the procedures
21. History of uncontrolled coagulopathy, ongoing coagulation treatment that cannot be safely interrupted for procedure, or unexplained or uncontrollable bleeding that is uncorrectable.
22. Identifiable anatomical variability that would materially alter the procedure as described in the protocol.
23. Within the preceding 2 years, subject has suffered from active narcotic addiction, substance, or alcohol abuse.
24. Current prescribed opioid medications greater than 50 morphine equivalent daily opioid dose.
25. Uncontrolled immunosuppression (e.g. AIDS, cancer, diabetes, etc.).
26. Subject currently implanted with pacemaker, stimulator or defibrillator.
27. Participating in another clinical trial/investigation which included therapeutic treatment within 30 days prior to signing informed consent.
28. Subject unwilling or unable to comply with follow up schedule, protocol requirements or procedures.
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Avanos Medical

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

David Provenzano

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Pain Diagnostics and Interventional Care

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

International Spine & Pain Performance Center

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Millennium Pain Center

Bloomington, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Ochsner Baptist Medical Center

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Premier Pain Centers

Shrewsbury, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

The Center for Clinical Research

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

University Orthopedics Center

Altoona, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pain Diagnostics and Interventional Care

Sewickley, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

University Orthopedics Center

State College, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

University of Utah

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

The Spine and Nerve Centers of St. Francis Hosptial

Charleston, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

105-20-0006

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.