Study Of The Efficacy Of Neurolysis In Functional Recovery From Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain

NCT ID: NCT01190033

Last Updated: 2013-03-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-08-31

Study Completion Date

2013-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. In an initial phase, 100 patients with chronic low back pain will be included in this study. The patients will be recruited through magazines and newspapers to take part in a screening for treatment of low back pain. This screening will involve the evaluation of data such as history and physical examination to classify the patient in the group of nonspecific low back pain, excluding patients with neurological alterations and the so-called Red-Flags.

Procedures After the initial screening the patients will undergo diagnostic blocks of the medial branch of lumbar vertebrae L2, L3, L4 , L5 and of the first sacral vertebra (S1) with lidocaine and control with distilled water. The patients that present more than 50% of pain improvement, evaluated by the Likert scale after 30 minutes will form the study group, while the patients that do not present pain improvement with lidocaine or that present pain improvement with distilled water will be excluded.

The medial branch block consists of the insertion of a 90mm, 25-gauge needle through the skin with radioscopic control up to the medial branch topography. Infusion of 1ml of 2% lidocaine should be performed in each medial branch of the abovementioned vertebrae. Control is executed in the same manner yet with infusion of 1ml of distilled water.

Through the use of the diagnostic block we will have 40 patients selected for the second phase of the study. Once defined the study group should be evaluated before the procedure through the Oswestry, Roland Morris, SF-36 and VAS questionnaires.

In the second phase of the study the patients will be randomized. The random division into two groups will be performed through a computerized program of random numbers. The randomization result will be kept in matt sealed envelopes to guarantee secrecy of the allocation. The neurolysis procedure will be carried out in the first group, consisting of 20 patients, and the placebo or sham procedure with the second group, also with 20 patients.

The neurolysis procedure will be carried out under sterile conditions, with the patient lying prone and with the neurotome insertion sites anesthetized with 2ml of 1% lidocaine. The neurotome (Smith \& Nephew - RF) will be used for the procedure. The neurotome is a radiofrequency apparatus mounted on a 10cm electrode type 22 needle with a 5mm exposure tip. The neurotome should be introduced percutaneously in a manner similar to that adopted in the medial branch block through radioscopic control. The temperature of the electrode after its placement in the correct position is then raised to 80 °C for 90 seconds. Two neurotomies should be performed for each facet, one proximally and the other distally, due to double innervation of each facet. In the patients of the placebo group the procedure will be the same only the temperature of the neurotome will not be raised. This will be performed in a blind manner, as before starting the procedure, the surgeon will show the assistant who turns the device on or not the envelope containing the patient's group (placebo or neurotomy), yet the surgeon will not be informed whether the device has been turned on or not, having to perform the procedure in the same manner in both groups.

The patients will then be reevaluated in the first month, 3 months after, 6 months after and 12 months after the procedure. The assessors will not be informed of the group to which the patient belongs, and the same scales performed in the preoperative period will be used here.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Low Back Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Neurolysis

In this intervention the neurotome will be connected

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

neurolysis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In this procedure the neurotome will be connected

Neurotome OFF

neurotome not raised

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Neurotome OFF

Intervention Type DEVICE

In this intervention the neurotome will be unconnected.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Neurotome OFF

In this intervention the neurotome will be unconnected.

Intervention Type DEVICE

neurolysis

In this procedure the neurotome will be connected

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* clinical diagnosis of lumbar pain in a patient with age between 20 and 60 years.
* present clinical complaints of low back pain for 3 months or more.
* present pain of moderate to severe intensity: visual analogue scale (VAS) \> 4.

Exclusion Criteria

* patients that develop a profile compatible with specific low back pain during treatment.
* patients that request their withdrawal from the study at any time.
* patients that develop an allergy to the medication used.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Sao Paulo

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Alexandre F. Cristante

PhD.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology of the U.S.P

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Alexandre Cristante Fogaça

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

iot 803

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

RIZT2010

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pilates to Treat Low Back Pain
NCT01502059 COMPLETED PHASE3