Comparison of Neural Mobilization Techniques to Standard Care Treatment in Patients With Lumbar Radiculitis
NCT ID: NCT02941133
Last Updated: 2017-05-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
130 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-09-30
2020-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Management of LBP With Radiculopathy.
NCT04022798
Τhe Effect of Lumbar Spine Mobilization and Manipulation on Pressure Pain Threshold in Patients with NSLBP
NCT06757400
The Value of Traction in Treatment of Lumbar Radiculopathy
NCT00942227
Three-dimensional Lumbar Myofascial Release and Motor Control in Lumbar Radiculopathy
NCT06990113
Effect of Thoracic Mobilization on Lumbar Radiculopathy
NCT06167044
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Radicular pain has been regarded as a distinct pain entity as its pathophysiology differs from that of somatic referred pain and nociceptive pain. Radicular lumbar pain describes sensitized nerve roots of the lumbar spine or peripheral nerve trunks that are capable of producing pain (usually below the knee) and/or other symptoms in the absence of true nerve tissue damage. This type of pain is evoked by ectopic discharges stemming from lumbar dorsal roots or their ganglions. The most common causes for this type of pain is the inflammatory environment that is produced by substances contained in the herniated material of injured lumbar intervertebral discs.
It has been suggested that patients presenting with functional (e.g. mechanosensitivity) but not structural nerve root problems, can be identified through screening and further classified as a discrete group of patients that benefit from specific neural mobilization techniques.
Neural mobilization techniques have gained considerable amount of attention amongst therapists and researchers for the assessment and treatment of painful conditions that occasionally involve a neural element in their pathophysiology such as lumbar radicular pain. Studies exploring the effect of neural mobilization techniques on patients with lumbar radicular pain have generally shown good results but they are lacking in adequate sample size and methodological quality.
The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of neural mobilization techniques to standard care physiotherapy treatment (ultrasound, general exercises, massage therapy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation) in patients with lumbar radiculitis.
Participants:
Patients with low back pain that radiates to the lower limb.
Patients that satisfy the inclusion criteria will be screened and classified by another researcher into the distinct group of lumbar radiculitis. Another researcher will take baseline measurements and all patients of this sub-group will be randomly assigned to receive either neural mobilization or standard care physiotherapy treatment. Both groups will receive a total of 10 treatments twice per week for 5 weeks. Patients will be assessed using specific outcome measures prior to treatment (baseline), at 5 weeks (post treatment) and 6 months after treatment.
Statistical analysis:
Data will be analysed with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), version 22. Intension to treat analysis will be applied. A two-way mixed-model analysis of variance will be used for outcome measures, with treatment groups (neural mobilization or standard care treatment) as the between-subject variable and time (baseline, 1 month follow up, six months follow up) as the within-subject variable. Comparison of baseline demographic characteristics will be analysed using the t-tests for continuous variables and the chi square tests for categorical variables.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Neural Mobilization Group
Patients in this group will be treated with neural mobilization techniques.
Neural Mobilization
Neural mobilization techniques aimed at the lumbar root that is affected
Standard Care Group
Patients in this group will be treated with standard care (ultrasound, exercise, TENS, massage)
Standard Care
Ultrasound - Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) - Massage therapy - Strengthening exercises
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Neural Mobilization
Neural mobilization techniques aimed at the lumbar root that is affected
Standard Care
Ultrasound - Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) - Massage therapy - Strengthening exercises
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Duration of symptoms \> 6 weeks
* Patients willing to be reassessed after 6 months
* Patients willing to give written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* History of surgery or injury in the lower limbs in the past 6 months
* Signs and symptoms of central nervous system involvement
* Nerve root blocks for the past 6 weeks
* History of diabetes
* History of polyneuropathies
* History of vascular pathologies in the lower limbs
* History of systemic pathologies
* History of inflammatory arthropathies
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Michalis Efstathiou
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Michalis Efstathiou
Assosiate Lecturer
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michalis Efstathiou, MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Nicosia
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Schafer A, Hall T, Muller G, Briffa K. Outcomes differ between subgroups of patients with low back and leg pain following neural manual therapy: a prospective cohort study. Eur Spine J. 2011 Mar;20(3):482-90. doi: 10.1007/s00586-010-1632-2. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MISS13
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.