Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2003-08-31
2011-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
i. Facet joint nerve blocks have therapeutic value beyond the duration of local anesthetic effect.
ii. Addition of Depo-steroid provides additional relief of thoracic facet joint pain when used with facet joint nerve blocks.
2. To demonstrate whether or not there are clinically significant improvements in function of patients who receive thoracic facet joint nerve block with Depo-steroid compared to patients randomized to Group I who receive only local anesthetic blocks.
3. To determine the adverse event profile in both groups
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effectiveness of Lumbar Facet Joint Nerve Blocks
NCT00355914
Open Facet Joint Denervation in the Treatment of Low Back Pain
NCT03487120
Invasive Treatment of Lower Back Pain
NCT05359640
Effectiveness of Facet Joint Infiltration in Low Back Pain
NCT01447160
Comparison of Neural Mobilization Techniques to Standard Care Treatment in Patients With Lumbar Radiculitis
NCT02941133
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria Only patients with nonspecific mid-back or upper back pain without suspected disc herniation, radiculitis, thoracic fracture, stenosis, or intercostal neuritis were included. Further, patients suspected of disc-related pain with radicular symptoms were also excluded, based on radiologic testing and symptomatology involving radicular or chest wall pain. Patients also should have previously received conservative management with physical therapy, chiropractic manipulation exercises, drug therapy, and bed rest, and so forth, but continued to have pain.
Further inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of thoracic facet joint pain by means of controlled comparative local anesthetic blocks; patients who were over 18 years of age; patients with a history of chronic function-limiting mid-back or upper back pain of at least 6 months duration; and patients who where competent to understand the study protocol and provide voluntary, written informed consent, and participate in the outcome measurements. A negative or false-positive response to controlled comparative local anesthetic blocks, uncontrollable to heavy opioid use (morphine equivalent of 300 mg), uncontrolled
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group I - without Steroids
Thoracic Facet Joint Nerve Blocks with Local Anesthetic(0.25% Bupivacaine)
Thoracic facet joint nerve blocks
Thoracic medial branch blocks
Group II - with steroid
Thoracic Facet Joint Nerve Blocks with Local Anesthetic (0.25% Bupivacaine) and Sterioids(0.15 mg of non-particulate betamethasone)
Thoracic facet joint nerve blocks
Thoracic medial branch blocks
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Thoracic facet joint nerve blocks
Thoracic medial branch blocks
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Candidates are over 18 years of age
Subjects with a history of chronic, function limiting neck pain of at least six months in duration Subjects who are able to give voluntary, written informed consent to participate in this investigation Subjects who, in the opinion of the Investigator, are able to understand this investigation, co-operate with the investigational procedures and are willing to return to the center for all the required post-operative follow-ups The subject has not had recent surgical procedures within the last three months.
\-
Exclusion Criteria
Narcotic use of greater than Hydrocodone 100 mg/day, Methadone 80 mg or Morphine 100 mg, or dose equivalent
Uncontrolled major Depression or uncontrolled psychiatric disorders
Uncontrolled or acute medical illnesses including coagulopathy, renal insufficiency, chronic liver dysfunction, progressive neurological deficit, urinary sphincter dysfunction, infection, increased intercranial pressure, pseudotumor cerebri, intercranial tumors, unstable angina, and severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Chronic severe conditions that could interfere with the interpretations of the outcome assessments for pain and bodily function
Women who are pregnant or lactating
Subjects who have participated in a clinical study with an investigational product within 30 days of enrollment
Patients with multiple complaints involving concomitant hip osteoarthritis, will not be amenable to study due to the overlap of pain complaints.
Inability to achieve appropriate positioning and inability to understand informed consent and protocol History of adverse reaction to local anesthetic or anti-inflammatory drugs
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Pain Management Center of Paducah
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Laxmaiah Manchikanti, MD
Medical Director
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Laxmaiah Manchikanti, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ambulatory Surgery Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ambulatory Surgery Center
Paducah, Kentucky, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Manchikanti L, Singh V, Falco FJ, Cash KA, Pampati V, Fellows B. The role of thoracic medial branch blocks in managing chronic mid and upper back pain: a randomized, double-blind, active-control trial with a 2-year followup. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2012;2012:585806. doi: 10.1155/2012/585806. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
Manchikanti L, Singh V, Falco FJ, Cash KA, Pampati V, Fellows B. Comparative effectiveness of a one-year follow-up of thoracic medial branch blocks in management of chronic thoracic pain: a randomized, double-blind active controlled trial. Pain Physician. 2010 Nov-Dec;13(6):535-48.
Manchikanti L, Singh V, Falco FJ, Cash KA, Pampati V. Effectiveness of thoracic medial branch blocks in managing chronic pain: a preliminary report of a randomized, double-blind controlled trial. Pain Physician. 2008 Jul-Aug;11(4):491-504.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
The Role of Thoracic Medial Branch Blocks in Managing Chronic Mid and Upper Back Pain: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Control Trial with a 2-Year Followup
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
protocol 5
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.