Effectiveness of Percutaneous Lumbar Epidural Adhesiolysis and Neurolysis on Low Back Pain

NCT ID: NCT00370994

Last Updated: 2020-03-10

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-01-31

Study Completion Date

2013-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Clinically significant improvements in the percutaneous adhesiolysis patients with hypertonic neurolysis compared to those patients randomized to the control group who did not receive adhesiolysis and hypertonic saline neurolysis. Improvement will be assessed in relation to the clinical outcome measures of pain and function.

Improvements among patients with adhesiolysis and hypertonic saline neurolysis and compare to control group.

Compare adverse event profile in both groups

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients with chronic low back pain and lower extremity pain secondary to spinal stenosis or post lumbar laminectomy syndrome, non responsive to conservative therapy with physical therapy or chiropractic and medical therapy and fluoroscopically directed epidural steroid injections.

Single-center, prospective, controlled, double blind, randomized study. If non-responsive or at patient's request, the patient may be unblinded anytime after 3 months, and will be offered adhesiolysis and hypertonic saline neurolysis if the patient was in the control group. All patients will be unblinded at 24 months.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Low Back Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Caudal epidural injection

Caudal epidural with placement of catheter in sacral canal with injection of 5 mL of 2% preservative-free lidocaine, followed by 6 mL of 0.9% sodium chloride solution and 6 mg of non-particulate Betamethasone and 1 mL of sodium chloride solution

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Caudal epidural injection

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Caudal epidural injection with catheterization

Percutaneous adhesiolysis

Pecutaneous adhesiolysis and targeted placement of Racz catheter with injection of 5 mL of 2% preservative-free lidocaine, followed by 6 mL of 10% sodium chloride solution and 6 mg of non-particulate Betamethasone and 1 mL of sodium chloride solution

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Percutaneous adhesiolysis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Percutaneous adhesiolysis with hypertonic saline neurolysis

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Caudal epidural injection

Caudal epidural injection with catheterization

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Percutaneous adhesiolysis

Percutaneous adhesiolysis with hypertonic saline neurolysis

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Over 18 years of age
* History of chronic, function limiting low back pain of at least 6 months in duration
* Able to give voluntary, written informed consent
* Able to understand investigational procedures and willing to return for follow-ups
* No recent surgical procedures within last 3 months

Exclusion Criteria

* Large contained or sequestered herniation
* Cauda Equina symptoms and/or compressive radiculopathy
* Narcotic use of no greater than 100mg/day Hydrocodone, 60mg Methadone, or 100mg Morphine
* Uncontrolled major depression or psychiatric disorder
* Uncontrolled or acute medical illness
* Chronic sever conditions that could interfere with outcome assessments
* Women who are pregnant or lactating
* Subjects who have participated in a clinical study with an investigational product within 30 days of enrollment
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pain Management Center of Paducah

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Laxmaiah Manchikanti, MD

Medical Director

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Laxmaiah Manchikanti, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ambulatory Surgery Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ambulatory Surgery Center

Paducah, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Manchikanti L, Singh V, Cash KA, Pampati V. Assessment of effectiveness of percutaneous adhesiolysis and caudal epidural injections in managing post lumbar surgery syndrome: 2-year follow-up of a randomized, controlled trial. J Pain Res. 2012;5:597-608. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S38999. Epub 2012 Dec 20.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23293536 (View on PubMed)

Manchikanti L, Singh V, Cash KA, Pampati V, Datta S. A comparative effectiveness evaluation of percutaneous adhesiolysis and epidural steroid injections in managing lumbar post surgery syndrome: a randomized, equivalence controlled trial. Pain Physician. 2009 Nov-Dec;12(6):E355-68.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 19935992 (View on PubMed)

Manchikanti L, Cash KA, McManus CD, Pampati V, Singh V, Benyamin R. The preliminary results of a comparative effectiveness evaluation of adhesiolysis and caudal epidural injections in managing chronic low back pain secondary to spinal stenosis: a randomized, equivalence controlled trial. Pain Physician. 2009 Nov-Dec;12(6):E341-54.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 19935991 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3533727/

Assessment of effectiveness of percutaneous adhesiolysis and caudal epidural injections in managing post lumbar surgery syndrome: 2-year follow-up of a randomized, controlled trial.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

protocol 11

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.