The Short-Term Effects of Dry Cupping the Lumbar Paraspinal Muscles in Individuals With Non-specific Low Back Pain
NCT ID: NCT06469762
Last Updated: 2025-07-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
52 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-11-01
2025-04-04
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of Slump Stretching vs Lumbar Mobilization With Exercises in Relieving Non-radiculating Low Back Pain
NCT03631082
Pulsatile Cupping in Low Back Pain
NCT02090686
Effects of Two Different Dry-Needling Techniques for Low Back Pain
NCT03970486
The Effect of Dry Needling on Trunk Muscle Function in Low Back Pain Patients
NCT02250742
A Follow-up Comparison of Active Versus Passive Manual Therapy in Patients With Low Back Pain
NCT03758807
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
After potential participants contact the investigator regarding their interest in the pilot study, a detailed information letter will be provided to them. The information letter will include details pertaining to the pilot study including the purpose, procedures, duration, potential session availabilities, and the location at which the research will take place. If the prospective participant is still interested in engaging in the pilot study, they will arrange an appropriate time to meet with the investigator for data collection. Three sessions will be scheduled, each approximately 48 hours apart (e.g., Monday, Wednesday and Friday). Each session will last about 60 minutes and will take place at Lakehead University in the School of Kinesiology Sanders Building in room SB-1025.
Participants will be randomly assigned to either a placebo or intervention group, which will be decided prior to the first session. Should the participant be in the placebo group and wish to receive treatment, they will be offered this opportunity upon the completion of the data collection session. In the first session, the potential participant will review and sign the provided consent form. The investigator will also explain the ability to withdraw from the pilot study at any time without penalty. After informed consent has been given, the participant will then complete the Get Active Questionnaire (GAQ) and a Participant Demographic form which will include information related to their gender, sex, age, height, and body mass. Should the participant respond "Yes" to any question on the GAQ, they must be cleared by their medical provider prior to participation.
At this point the intervention will begin, the participant will be asked to lay prone on the examination table, with their lumbar spine exposed. The investigator will landmark the L1 and L5 vertebrae and mark this location with a washable, skin safe marker. This will be located by palpating for the iliac crests and following them directly inward to landmark the spinous processes of L4. From there, L5 will be marked one thumb-width downward from the spinous process of L4, and L1 will be marked three thumb-widths up the spine after palpating the spinous processes of the respective vertebral bodies. From there, the investigator will measure 3 centimeters (cm) on each side of the landmarked spinous processes of L1 and L5, using the measuring tape. This will be done to standardize the location of the inclinometers, and all four locations will be marked using a marker. Next, the participant will be asked to identify their primary location of LBP (by pointing to the area; e.g., right side of L3), this area will be marked using a marker and will represent problem area one (P1). The participant will then be asked to name their secondary location of LBP (by pointing to the area; e.g., left side of L4), this area will be marked using a marker and will represent problem area two (P2). After the locations have been marked, baseline measurements will be taken. The skin temperature of the lumbar spine will be taken using the Maximum™ Laser Thermometer at P1 and P2 and the mean skin temperature will be calculated and recorded to the nearest tenth of a degree. Following that, the pressure pain threshold will be measured using the Wagner Force One™ Digital Force Gauge. Firstly, the participant will be asked to identify an area of no pain (e.g., the deltoid, triceps, or gastrocnemius), the pressure pain threshold will be measured at the indicated location, and the result will be recorded. This will be done by applying the tip of the Wagner Force One™ Digital Force Gauge perpendicular to the indicated area and applying a gradually increasing amount of pressure. The participant will be asked to indicate when the pressure sensation on the area transitions to a sensation of pain. At this point, the value indicated on the algometer will be recorded and the pressure will be removed. This will be used to establish a baseline in an area of no pain, and to familiarize the participant with the measurement tool. Next, measurements will be taken at P1 and P2, and the two measurements will be recorded to the nearest tenth of a Newton (N). Next, the participant will be asked to stand, and two inclinometers will be placed on the L1 and L5 landmarks on the ride side of the spine. The participant will be instructed to bend forward as far as comfortably possible. The mean of the two values measured by the inclinometers will be recorded to the nearest tenth of a degree. This will be completed again with the inclinometers on the left side and the mean of both the L1 and L5 values will be recorded. Following the measurements on both sides, the average of the right and left side measurements will be recorded. Finally, the participant will complete the Sit and Reach Test using the Sit and Reach Device. The Sit and Reach Test will be conducted by instructing the participant to remove their shoes and sitting on the floor with their back against a wall and legs out straight in long sitting. The feet will be placed into the foot pedals and their hands will be clasped together and resting on the metal measuring piece. The participant will be asked to keep their legs flat, and feet pressed against the pedals. They will then be asked to reach forward as far as possible, pushing the metal measuring piece with their fingertips. After 3 warm-up tries, the participant will hold the fourth trial for 3 seconds and the measurement will be recorded to the nearest tenth of a cm. The participant will also complete the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and be asked to indicate their current low back pain on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Finally, the participant will complete the Roland-Morris Questionnaire, to assess their overall function. The questionnaire will be scored by the investigator and the result will be recorded. Further information regarding psychometric properties of this tool will be provided in the Outcome Measures section.
Following the baseline measurements, the cupping treatment will begin. Once again, the participant will be asked to lay prone on the examination table. The investigator will apply a light layer of skin adhesive spray to the participant's lumbar spine at the 4 cupping locations. This will be used to improve suction. Four medium sized Hansol© plastic cups will be placed superior and inferior to P1 and P2 (i.e., superior to P1, inferior to P1, superior to P2, and inferior to P2). Those in the placebo group will receive cups with holes punctured in them, so that the suction is immediately released, while the adhesive spray will ensure the cups remain in place and do not change the sensation for the participant. Each cup will be pumped three times using the hand pump for consistent suction (465 mmHg of pressure). The cups will be left in a static position for a total of 10 minutes. After the treatment is concluded, the suction will be released, and the cups will be removed and placed into a bin to be later disinfected by the hydrogen peroxide solution as per the manufacturer's instructions.
Immediately following the cupping intervention, the skin temperature of P1 and P2 will be taken again using the Maximum™ (Model N08064) Laser Thermometer and the mean will be recorded. The pressure pain threshold will once again be measured using the Wagner Force One™ Digital Force Gauge at P1 and P2 as well as the non-painful site, and the dual inclinometry lumbar flexion and Sit and Reach Test will also be repeated, and the post intervention results will be recorded as described previously. The participant will also complete the NPRS once again and be asked to rate their current low back pain on a scale from 0 to 10. Next, they will complete the Roland-Morris Questionnaire, to assess their overall function, and finally, they will complete the Patient Global Impression of Change Scale (PGICS) and be asked to reflect on their treatment experience and indicate if their condition is "very much improved" (1) to "very much worse" (7). Further information regarding psychometric properties of this tool will be provided in the Outcome Measures section.
The participant will be thanked for their involvement and offered to receive a copy of the results at the completion of the pilot study. If the participant wishes, their email will be recorded to forward the results at a later date. Once the participant has left, the investigator will disinfect the table, inclinometer, and Sit and Reach Device using a disinfectant spray. The cups will be washed in a bin of warm water with dish detergent. After they are rinsed, they will be dried with paper towel, and taken and placed into the pre-mixed 3% hydrogen peroxide solution for 10 minutes as per the manufacturer's instructions. The solution will be made by combining one part 35% hydrogen peroxide with 11 parts water. After 10 minutes, the cups will be removed and set aside to dry before being used on the next participant.
The procedures will remain the same for both the individuals in the intervention and placebo condition, however, those in the placebo condition will receive cups with two 2 millimeter (mm) holes drilled in either side of them, so that the suction is immediately released upon application.
In the second and third sessions, the procedures will be repeated as previously described, with the exclusion of the consent form, GAQ, and Patient Demographic Form.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Placebo
Individuals in this condition will receive treatment using plastic cups with two 2 mm holes drilled in either side of them, for all three treatment sessions.
Placebo Dry Cupping
Dry cupping treatment session, using 4 plastic cups with two 2 mm holes drilled in either side of them, on the lumbar spine for 10 minutes.
Intervention
Individuals in this condition will receive treatment using regular plastic cups, for all three treatment sessions.
Dry Cupping
Dry cupping treatment session, using 4 regular plastic cups on the lumbar spine for 10 minutes.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dry Cupping
Dry cupping treatment session, using 4 regular plastic cups on the lumbar spine for 10 minutes.
Placebo Dry Cupping
Dry cupping treatment session, using 4 plastic cups with two 2 mm holes drilled in either side of them, on the lumbar spine for 10 minutes.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Between the ages of 18 - 55 years;
* Experiencing NSLBP; and
* Otherwise healthy, and successful completion of the GAQ (Should the participant be currently receiving treatment for NSLBP for another musculoskeletal condition, a wash out period of 2 days (48 hours) will be ensured between their treatment and study participation).
Exclusion Criteria
* Any individual with a previous or scheduled surgery to the lower body, which may affect their hip and/or knee ROM;
* Any individual with previous trauma to the lower back area;
* Any individual who is diagnosed with cancer;
* Any individual experiencing referred leg symptoms;
* Any individual who is confirmed or suspected to be pregnant; and
* Any individual with a confirmed or suspected blood/blood clotting disorder (i.e., hemophiliac).
18 Years
55 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Lakehead University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Lakehead University
Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Alghadir AH, Anwer S, Iqbal A, Iqbal ZA. Test-retest reliability, validity, and minimum detectable change of visual analog, numerical rating, and verbal rating scales for measurement of osteoarthritic knee pain. J Pain Res. 2018 Apr 26;11:851-856. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S158847. eCollection 2018.
Almeida Silva HJ, Avila MA, Castro KMS, Pinheiro YT, Lins CAA, Medeiros Barbosa G, de Souza MC. Exploring patient experiences of participating in a real and sham dry cupping intervention for nonspecific low back pain: A qualitative study. PLoS One. 2022 May 19;17(5):e0268656. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268656. eCollection 2022.
Al-Qahtani SG, Alsulami BA. Prevalence and predictors of use of cupping among patients attending a primary care center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. J Family Med Prim Care. 2023 Feb;12(2):376-382. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1615_22. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
Amundsen PA, Evans DW, Rajendran D, Bright P, Bjorkli T, Eldridge S, Buchbinder R, Underwood M, Froud R. Inclusion and exclusion criteria used in non-specific low back pain trials: a review of randomised controlled trials published between 2006 and 2012. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Apr 12;19(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2034-6.
Ayala F, Sainz de Baranda P, De Ste Croix M, Santonja F. Reproducibility and criterion-related validity of the sit and reach test and toe touch test for estimating hamstring flexibility in recreationally active young adults. Phys Ther Sport. 2012 Nov;13(4):219-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2011.11.001. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
Bobos P, Ziebart C, Furtado R, Lu Z, MacDermid JC. Psychometric properties of the global rating of change scales in patients with low back pain, upper and lower extremity disorders. A systematic review with meta-analysis. J Orthop. 2020 Feb 10;21:40-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.01.047. eCollection 2020 Sep-Oct.
Boyd BS. Measurement properties of a hand-held inclinometer during straight leg raise neurodynamic testing. Physiotherapy. 2012 Jun;98(2):174-9. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2011.04.352. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
Childs JD, Piva SR, Fritz JM. Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jun 1;30(11):1331-4. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000164099.92112.29.
Dimitriadis Z, Parintas I, Karamitanis G, Abdelmesseh K, Koumantakis GA, Kastrinis A. Reliability and Validity of the Double Inclinometer Method for Assessing Thoracolumbar Joint Position Sense and Range of Movement in Patients with a Recent History of Low Back Pain. Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Dec 29;11(1):105. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11010105.
Duniec L, Nowakowski P, Kosson D, Lazowski T. Anatomical landmarks based assessment of intravertebral space level for lumbar puncture is misleading in more than 30%. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2013 Jan-Mar;45(1):1-6. doi: 10.5603/AIT.2013.0001.
Fang H, Ho IMK. Intraday reliability, sensitivity, and minimum detectable change of national physical fitness measurement for preschool children in China. PLoS One. 2020 Nov 20;15(11):e0242369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242369. eCollection 2020.
Gallasch CH, Alexandre NM. The measurement of musculoskeletal pain intensity: a comparison of four methods. Rev Gaucha Enferm. 2007 Jun;28(2):260-5.
Lemmink KA, Kemper HC, de Greef MH, Rispens P, Stevens M. The validity of the sit-and-reach test and the modified sit-and-reach test in middle-aged to older men and women. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2003 Sep;74(3):331-6. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2003.10609099. No abstract available.
Markowski A, Sanford S, Pikowski J, Fauvell D, Cimino D, Caplan S. A pilot study analyzing the effects of Chinese cupping as an adjunct treatment for patients with subacute low back pain on relieving pain, improving range of motion, and improving function. J Altern Complement Med. 2014 Feb;20(2):113-7. doi: 10.1089/acm.2012.0769. Epub 2013 Dec 3.
Mayorga-Vega D, Merino-Marban R, Viciana J. Criterion-Related Validity of Sit-and-Reach Tests for Estimating Hamstring and Lumbar Extensibility: a Meta-Analysis. J Sports Sci Med. 2014 Jan 20;13(1):1-14. eCollection 2014 Jan.
Nussbaumer S, Leunig M, Glatthorn JF, Stauffacher S, Gerber H, Maffiuletti NA. Validity and test-retest reliability of manual goniometers for measuring passive hip range of motion in femoroacetabular impingement patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Aug 31;11:194. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-194.
Salemi MM, Gomes VMDSA, Bezerra LMR, Melo TMS, Alencar GG, Montenegro IHPM, Calado APM, Montenegro EJN, Siqueira GR. Effect of Dry Cupping Therapy on Pain and Functional Disability in Persistent Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. J Acupunct Meridian Stud. 2021 Dec 31;14(6):219-230. doi: 10.51507/j.jams.2021.14.6.219.
Stephens SL, DeJong Lempke AF, Hertel J, Saliba S. Clinical usage, application procedures, and perceived effectiveness of cupping therapy among healthcare professionals in the United States: A cross-sectional survey. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2022 Aug;48:101610. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2022.101610. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
Volpicelli Leonard K, Robertson C, Bhowmick A, Herbert LB. Perceived Treatment Satisfaction and Effectiveness Facilitators Among Patients With Chronic Health Conditions: A Self-Reported Survey. Interact J Med Res. 2020 Mar 6;9(1):e13029. doi: 10.2196/13029.
Wang YT, Qi Y, Tang FY, Li FM, Li QH, Xu CP, Xie GP, Sun HT. The effect of cupping therapy for low back pain: A meta-analysis based on existing randomized controlled trials. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2017 Nov 6;30(6):1187-1195. doi: 10.3233/BMR-169736.
Wood S, Fryer G, Tan LLF, Cleary C. Dry cupping for musculoskeletal pain and range of motion: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2020 Oct;24(4):503-518. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2020.06.024. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
Bhattacharyya A, Hopkinson LD, Nolet PS, Srbely J. The reliability of pressure pain threshold in individuals with low back or neck pain: a systematic review. Br J Pain. 2023 Dec;17(6):579-591. doi: 10.1177/20494637231196647. Epub 2023 Aug 26.
Salom-Moreno J, Ortega-Santiago R, Cleland JA, Palacios-Cena M, Truyols-Dominguez S, Fernandez-de-las-Penas C. Immediate changes in neck pain intensity and widespread pressure pain sensitivity in patients with bilateral chronic mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial of thoracic thrust manipulation vs non-thrust mobilization. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2014 Jun;37(5):312-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2014.03.003. Epub 2014 May 28.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
LakeheadU-Scavarelli
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.