Short Terms Effects of Medial Branch Block vs Para-spinal Muscle Injection in Patients With Non-specific CLBP

NCT ID: NCT02521519

Last Updated: 2018-10-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

84 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-08-31

Study Completion Date

2020-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study compares the efficacy of medial branch block (MBB) vs. paravertebral deep intramuscular (PDI) injection for pain relief in chronic low back pain. Based on randomization in first intervention session, one side receives MBB and the other side takes PDI and in second session the pattern reverses.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Pain relief following medial branch block (MBB) might be due to facet joints desensitization and/or myofascial trigger points' desensitization. Patients will be randomized to two groups. The first group receives MBB in one side and paravertebral deep intramuscular (PDI) injection in the other side of the back. Next week the pattern of injection will be reversed so the side which had received MBB will take PDI injection and PDI side will take MBB. Second group takes the intervention in reverse order.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Low Back Pain, Mechanical

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

One side of the patient's back

medial branch block (MBB): Using sterile conditions, 25 gauge needles will be placed in the desired position. In its final position for the L3 and L4 vertebrae the needle tip should reside at the junction of the superior articular process and the transverse process. At the L5-S1 level the needle tip should reach the junction between the sacral ala and the superior articular process of S1. Following a negative aspiration 0.5ml of injectate will be injected into each site.

Group Type OTHER

Medial branch block in one side

Intervention Type OTHER

MBB: Using sterile conditions, 25G needles will be placed in the desired position. In its final position for the L3 and L4 vertebrae the needle tip should reside at the junction of the superior articular process and the transverse process. At the L5-S1 level the needle tip should reach the junction between the sacral ala and the superior articular process of S1. Following a negative aspiration 0.5ml of injectate will be injected into each site.

Other side of the patient's back

These injections will target the deep para-spinal muscles between the spinous process and inter-pedicular line of the L3-5 vertebrae. Under fluoroscopic guidance, a 25-gauge needle will be advanced, directed towards the lamina at the mid-distance between inter-pedicular line and the spinous process of the L3, L4 and L5 vertebrae, until touching the bone. A straight forceps will be attached to the junction of the skin and the needle; the needle will then be withdrawn by 1.4cm, to reside inside the muscle bulk. A five ml syringe diameter will be used to point 1.4 cm withdrawal. Following a negative blood aspiration, each level will be injected with 0.5 ml of the injectate.

Group Type OTHER

paravertebral deep intramuscular (PDI) injection

Intervention Type OTHER

injections will target the deep para-spinal muscles between the spinous process and inter-pedicular line of the L3-5 vertebrae. Under fluoroscopic guidance, a 25-gauge needle will be advanced, directed towards the lamina at the mid-distance between inter-pedicular line and the spinous process of the L3, L4 and L5 vertebrae, until touching the bone. A straight forceps will be attached to the junction of the skin and the needle; the needle will then be withdrawn by 1.4cm, to reside inside the muscle bulk. A five ml syringe diameter will be used to point 1.4 cm withdrawal. Following a negative blood aspiration, each level will be injected with 0.5 ml of the injectate.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Medial branch block in one side

MBB: Using sterile conditions, 25G needles will be placed in the desired position. In its final position for the L3 and L4 vertebrae the needle tip should reside at the junction of the superior articular process and the transverse process. At the L5-S1 level the needle tip should reach the junction between the sacral ala and the superior articular process of S1. Following a negative aspiration 0.5ml of injectate will be injected into each site.

Intervention Type OTHER

paravertebral deep intramuscular (PDI) injection

injections will target the deep para-spinal muscles between the spinous process and inter-pedicular line of the L3-5 vertebrae. Under fluoroscopic guidance, a 25-gauge needle will be advanced, directed towards the lamina at the mid-distance between inter-pedicular line and the spinous process of the L3, L4 and L5 vertebrae, until touching the bone. A straight forceps will be attached to the junction of the skin and the needle; the needle will then be withdrawn by 1.4cm, to reside inside the muscle bulk. A five ml syringe diameter will be used to point 1.4 cm withdrawal. Following a negative blood aspiration, each level will be injected with 0.5 ml of the injectate.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* CLBP of non-malignant origin fulfilling the following criteria:

* Pain lasting for at least three months
* Pain in both the left and right sides of the back
* Pain below the L2 vertebral body
* Lumbar spine CT scan or MRI done in the last 2 years
* Average visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain ≥4/10 on each side for the 3 days
* Cognitive and physical ability to provide informed consent in English or French

Exclusion Criteria

* Neurologic signs or symptoms suggesting nerve root involvement
* Strictly unilateral Low Back Pain (LBP)
* CT scan or MRI findings suggestive of pain etiology beyond degenerative spine disease

* Vascular malformations
* Tumor
* Infection
* Fractures
* DISH (Diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis)
* Patients who have received injections of any type or acupuncture therapy to the low back in the last 3 months
* Prior spine surgery
* Local or systemic infection
* Bleeding disorder or the use of anticoagulation medications but for low-dose aspirin
* Known allergy to amid local anesthetics
* Active insurance claim (CSST, SAAQ)
* Uncontrolled psychiatric condition
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Yoram Shir

Director of the Alan Edwards Pain Management Unit

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Alan Edwards Pain Management Unit - Montreal General Hospital

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Yoram Shir

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Yoram Shir, MD

Role: primary

Linda Ferguson

Role: backup

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

14-190

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.