Interferential Current Treatment Reduces Low Back Pain and Improves Functionality in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain.

NCT ID: NCT05843136

Last Updated: 2023-05-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-01-05

Study Completion Date

2023-03-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

. 24 individuals were evaluated, with low back pain for more than 12 weeks and aged between 12 and 65 years. The current used in the lumbar region of the participants was of the tetrapolar interferential type and the stimulation mode was the automatic vector, carrier of 4,000 HZ, modulation frequency (AMF) of 50 HZ, sweep frequency of SWEEP of 20HZ. The assessment of pain and functionality was performed using the data collection instrument, the Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS), Rolland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) and the Owestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) respectively. The present study demonstrates that treatment with interferential current promotes chemical improvement in participants, which opens up new perspectives on the use of this therapeutic approach.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Low back pain is characterized by pain and represents a change in health that affects mainly adults, although electrostimulation represents an important tool in the treatment of patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain, the clinical efficacy of the interferential current used in physiotherapy still lacks reinforcement for clinical validation. In this way, the present study evaluated whether the use of interferential current contributes to reducing chronic low back pain and analyzed whether the electrotherapeutic protocol can benefit the physical functionality of patients with chronic low back pain. 24 individuals were evaluated, with low back pain for more than 12 weeks and aged between 12 and 65 years. The current used in the lumbar region of the participants was of the tetrapolar interferential type and the stimulation mode was the automatic vector, carrier of 4,000 HZ, modulation frequency (AMF) of 50 HZ, sweep frequency of SWEEP of 20HZ. The assessment of pain and functionality was performed using the data collection instrument, the Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS), Rolland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) and the Owestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) respectively. Data analysis was performed using the JAMOVI 2.2.5 software. Our data showed that individuals with interferential current showed significant improvement in pain relief, as well as in the functional pattern of pain improvement. The present study demonstrates that treatment with interferential current promotes chemical improvement in participants, which opens up new perspectives on the use of this therapeutic approach.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Low-back Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The research is a randomized clinical trial, was submitted and approved by the Human Ethics Committee (CEP) with opinion 5,175,882, CAEE: 52035721.9.0000.0171. Participants were chosen at random, with single-blind masking, Random Allocation ® software was used to generate random numbers for the intervention and control groups, non-probalistic convenience sample. There were three groups: interventional, control 01 and control 02
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
only the participant was blinded

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervenction

We used the SONOPULSE II device from the manufacturer IBRAMED, the electrodes measuring nine centimeters in length and five centimeters in width, from the manufacturer ARKTUS, of the adhesive plate type.

According to the IBRAMED manual (2011, p. 47), the application is produced by two medium frequency currents through four electrodes, quadripolar method. The current type is tetrapolar interferential and the stimulation mode is automatic vector; the carrier frequency of 4000HZ, AMF modulation frequency of 50HZ, and the sweep frequency of SWEEP will be 20HZ. SWEEP sweep modes with 6 seconds of rise from the modulation frequency to the threshold the sweep frequency upon reaching the threshold immediately decays over the next 6 seconds. The positioning of the four-leaf clover type electrodes and the intensity of the strong current, however comfortable, according to the patient's report.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

physiotherapy treatment

Intervention Type OTHER

this is an interventional study of the use of 3 physiotherapy treatment techniques in order to evaluate the effectiveness of interferential current in relieving chronic low back pain

Control Group 01

he treatment is based on non-invasive methods, highlighting manual therapy techniques, especially joint manipulation therapy. Manual therapy techniques are adjustments in lumbar rotation. Joint adjustment is a controlled lever-like force with direction, amplitude, and speed that is applied to specific, tissue-adjacent joints. While joint mobilization is manual therapy without the impulse, the joint remains within the physiological range of motion (SILVA et al., 2012). Therefore, a high-velocity, low-amplitude (HVA) manual maneuver was applied. The thrust (impulse) is carried out in the para-physiological environment, between the physiological and anatomical barriers. preload phase before the manipulation, thrust phase where the maneuver is performed with high speed and low amplitude and the resolution phase where the manipulation ends. The maneuver is detailed by the authors Bergmann \& Peterson (2010).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

physiotherapy treatment

Intervention Type OTHER

this is an interventional study of the use of 3 physiotherapy treatment techniques in order to evaluate the effectiveness of interferential current in relieving chronic low back pain

Control Group 02

The procedure adopted in this group was based on the guidelines and recommendations for non-pharmacological treatment of the Associação Médica Brasileira AMB (RACHED, R.D.V.A. et al, 2013) use of 1 MHZ Ultrasound with a power of 1W/cm2, continuous IBRAMED device for 10 minutes, Wave Diathermy Short for 15 minutes/day, HTM brand, TENS 50 HZ and 50 ms intensity phase according to the patient's threshold, 30 minutes, IBRAMED brand

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

physiotherapy treatment

Intervention Type OTHER

this is an interventional study of the use of 3 physiotherapy treatment techniques in order to evaluate the effectiveness of interferential current in relieving chronic low back pain

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

physiotherapy treatment

this is an interventional study of the use of 3 physiotherapy treatment techniques in order to evaluate the effectiveness of interferential current in relieving chronic low back pain

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Individuals of both genders
* Aged between 18 and 65 years
* Voluntarily sought the Clinic's physiotherapy service
* Low back pain for more than 12 weeks
* Medical request and diagnosis of low back pain with or without pain radiating to the lower limbs
* Immunization against COVID 19.
* Signature of the free detailed term clarified. (FDTC)

Exclusion Criteria

* Physiotherapy treatment carried out in a period equal to or less than 8 weeks before starting the research
* Reporting any contraindications inherent to the use of electrotherapy
* Participants with fractures or spinal surgery
* Involved in a legal medical dispute
* Diagnosis of fibromyalgia
* Patients with flu-like symptoms during the research period
* Participants who have more than 2 (two) absences will be excluded from the research.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fundação Amazônia de Amparo a Estudos e Pesquisas FAPESPA

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Universidade Federal do Oeste do Para

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

LUIZ PAULO SOBRAL PEREIRA

Master's in Health Sciences

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Luiz Paulo Sobral Pereia

Santarém, Pará, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CAEE: 52035721.9.0000.0171

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

KT on Low Back Pain Patients
NCT03463200 UNKNOWN NA