Identifying Pain Generators and Potentiators of Residual Complaints Following Lumbar Discectomy
NCT ID: NCT05022251
Last Updated: 2023-12-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
1 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-10-01
2023-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In order to develop a focused and effective treatment strategy, it is crucial to first gain insight into how persons with persistent complaints after lumbar discectomy differ from those without persistent symptoms. Different known contributing factors entail type of surgery, muscle and psychosocial impairments. Although in scientific and clinical literature it is assumed that dysfunctional pain processing also plays an important mechanistic role in FBSS, there is a lack of research to support this. However, this knowledge is crucial to depict the full mechanistic picture of pain generators and potentiators in FBSS.
Therefore, we will examine whether residual complaints persisting following lumbar discectomy can be accounted for by underlying dysfunctional pain processing and whether a clinical classification algorithm can be used to identify the predominant pain mechanism in these patients.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Lumbar radiculopathy
Lumbar radiculopathy patients (n=122), classified as ASA I to II without any symptoms of spinal cord compression (i.e. bilateral leg pain), who are scheduled for a first-time, single-level, unilateral lumbar discectomy.
Lumbar discectomy
surgically removing a hernia
Healthy controls
Sex, age, and BMI-matched healthy, pain-free control subjects (n=122) will be recruited for study participation.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lumbar discectomy
surgically removing a hernia
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Body mass index below 35kg/m²
* Lumbar radiculopathy patients, classified as ASA I to II without any symptoms of spinal cord compression (i.e. bilateral leg pain), who are scheduled for a first-time, single-level, unilateral lumbar discectomy
* Healthy, pain-free controls (score 0 on a visual analogue scale from 0 to 100)
Exclusion Criteria
* Having (a history) of severe medical disorders either respiratory (e.g. cystic fibrosis), orthopedic (e.g. whiplash trauma), neurologic (e.g. cerebrovascular incident), cardiovascular (e.g. severe hypertension), endocrinological (e.g. diabetes), psychiatric (e.g. post-traumatic stress disorder
* Having a history of spinal surgery (e.g. discectomy), spinal traumata (e.g. vertebral fracture) or severe spinal deformities (e.g. spondylolisthesis)
* Having a pacemaker or defibrillator
* Healthy controls will be excluded if having suffered low back pain in the preceding year of score 2 or higher on the visual analog scale and which limited their activities of daily living or for which they consulted a (para)medic.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Research Foundation Flanders
OTHER
University Ghent
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jessica Van Oosterwijck, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Ghent University; Research Foundation Flanders
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ghent University (Hospital)
Ghent, , Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
3F014119
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
BC-08041
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id