PreFER Managed Ventricular Pacing (MVP) For Elective Replacement
NCT ID: NCT00293241
Last Updated: 2016-06-24
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
630 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2006-02-28
2011-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
REmodeling the Left Ventricle With Atrial Modulated Pacing
NCT03210402
Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy of Previously Right Ventricular Paced Heart Failure Patients
NCT01466621
Effects of Left Ventricular Pacing Optimilization on Cardiac Perfusion, Contractile Force, and Clinical Performance in Patients With Ventricular Dysfunction and Heart Failure
NCT00551681
Optimize RV Follow-up Selective Site Pacing Clinical Trial
NCT00949715
The REACT-ICD Trial
NCT02439424
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Therefore a new pacing modality, Managed Ventricular Pacing (MVP), was designed to give preference to natural heart activity by minimizing unnecessary right ventricular pacing. This is accomplished by automatically switching between single chamber atrial and dual-chamber pacing based on specific patient needs.
MVP is an atrial-based dual-chamber pacing mode that provides functional AAI/R pacing with ventricular monitoring and back-up DDD/R pacing only as needed during episodes of AV block.
The reversibility of the detrimental effects caused by ventricular pacing has been initially investigated in small patient populations with short pacing durations in AAI and needs further investigation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
MVP ON
Managed Ventricular Pacing programmed on
Managed Ventricular Pacing programmed ON/OFF
Device programming
MVP OFF
Managed Ventricular Pacing programmed off: conventional pacing
Managed Ventricular Pacing programmed ON/OFF
Device programming
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Managed Ventricular Pacing programmed ON/OFF
Device programming
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Planned to be replaced or replaced with a device including the MVP feature
* Have had more than 40% ventricular pacing documented with their old device over a period of at least 4 weeks before enrollment or device replacement.
* Pacing should not be caused by a switch to the single chamber pacing (VVI) mode because of battery depletion
* Have signed the informed consent
* Have no need to change the pacing mode or the atrioventricular (AV) intervals.
Exclusion Criteria
* Permanent AF
* Permanent AV block
* Inability to complete follow-up visits at a study center.
* Unwillingness or inability to cooperate or give written informed consent, or the patient is a minor, and legal guardian refuses to give informed consent
* Planned cardiovascular intervention
* Inclusion in another clinical trial that will affect the objectives of this study
* Neurocardiogenic syncope as primary implantable pulse generator (IPG) indication.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Oliver Piot, Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Centre Cardiologique du Nord, Saint-Denis, France
Aurelio Quesada, Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Spain
De Roy, Prof.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Cliniques Universitaires de Mont-Godinne, Yvoir, Belgium
Renato Ricci, Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy
Gianluca Botto, Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Como S. Anna Hospital, Como, Italy
Milan Kozak, Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Fakultní nemocnice Brno Bohunice, Brno, Czech Republic
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Medtronic Bakken Research Center
Maastricht, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ricci RP, Botto GL, Benezet JM, Nielsen JC, De Roy L, Piot O, Quesada A, Quaglione R, Vaccari D, Mangoni L, Grammatico A, Kozak M; PreFER MVP Investigators. Association between ventricular pacing and persistent atrial fibrillation in patients indicated to elective pacemaker replacement: Results of the Prefer for Elective Replacement MVP (PreFER MVP) randomized study. Heart Rhythm. 2015 Nov;12(11):2239-46. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.06.041. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Version 2-Aug 21, 2007
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.