PreFER Managed Ventricular Pacing (MVP) For Elective Replacement

NCT ID: NCT00293241

Last Updated: 2016-06-24

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

630 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-02-28

Study Completion Date

2011-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the benefit of MVP in pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients with a history of right ventricular pacing.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A number of clinical studies (Danish I, Danish II, David, MOST) over the past few years have shown that, in patients with intact atrioventricular (AV) conduction, unnecessary chronic right ventricular (RV) pacing can cause a variety of detrimental effects, including atrial fibrillation (AF), left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, and congestive heart failure (CHF). These effects are believed to result from the mechanical dyssynchrony and ventricular chamber dysfunction that occurs with chronic, single-site, apical ventricular stimulation.

Therefore a new pacing modality, Managed Ventricular Pacing (MVP), was designed to give preference to natural heart activity by minimizing unnecessary right ventricular pacing. This is accomplished by automatically switching between single chamber atrial and dual-chamber pacing based on specific patient needs.

MVP is an atrial-based dual-chamber pacing mode that provides functional AAI/R pacing with ventricular monitoring and back-up DDD/R pacing only as needed during episodes of AV block.

The reversibility of the detrimental effects caused by ventricular pacing has been initially investigated in small patient populations with short pacing durations in AAI and needs further investigation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiovascular Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

MVP ON

Managed Ventricular Pacing programmed on

Group Type OTHER

Managed Ventricular Pacing programmed ON/OFF

Intervention Type DEVICE

Device programming

MVP OFF

Managed Ventricular Pacing programmed off: conventional pacing

Group Type OTHER

Managed Ventricular Pacing programmed ON/OFF

Intervention Type DEVICE

Device programming

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Managed Ventricular Pacing programmed ON/OFF

Device programming

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients implanted with a dual chamber device (including atrial synchronous ventricular inhibited \[VDD\]) for a minimum time duration of 2 years
* Planned to be replaced or replaced with a device including the MVP feature
* Have had more than 40% ventricular pacing documented with their old device over a period of at least 4 weeks before enrollment or device replacement.
* Pacing should not be caused by a switch to the single chamber pacing (VVI) mode because of battery depletion
* Have signed the informed consent
* Have no need to change the pacing mode or the atrioventricular (AV) intervals.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) indication
* Permanent AF
* Permanent AV block
* Inability to complete follow-up visits at a study center.
* Unwillingness or inability to cooperate or give written informed consent, or the patient is a minor, and legal guardian refuses to give informed consent
* Planned cardiovascular intervention
* Inclusion in another clinical trial that will affect the objectives of this study
* Neurocardiogenic syncope as primary implantable pulse generator (IPG) indication.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Oliver Piot, Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Centre Cardiologique du Nord, Saint-Denis, France

Aurelio Quesada, Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Spain

De Roy, Prof.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Cliniques Universitaires de Mont-Godinne, Yvoir, Belgium

Renato Ricci, Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

San Filippo Neri Hospital, Rome, Italy

Gianluca Botto, Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Como S. Anna Hospital, Como, Italy

Milan Kozak, Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Fakultní nemocnice Brno Bohunice, Brno, Czech Republic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Medtronic Bakken Research Center

Maastricht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Netherlands

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ricci RP, Botto GL, Benezet JM, Nielsen JC, De Roy L, Piot O, Quesada A, Quaglione R, Vaccari D, Mangoni L, Grammatico A, Kozak M; PreFER MVP Investigators. Association between ventricular pacing and persistent atrial fibrillation in patients indicated to elective pacemaker replacement: Results of the Prefer for Elective Replacement MVP (PreFER MVP) randomized study. Heart Rhythm. 2015 Nov;12(11):2239-46. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.06.041. Epub 2015 Jun 30.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26142300 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Version 2-Aug 21, 2007

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study
NCT02004873 COMPLETED NA