Managed Ventricular Pacing ("MVP") Trial

NCT ID: NCT00281099

Last Updated: 2010-08-03

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1031 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-10-31

Study Completion Date

2008-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the study is to compare two device settings (sets of instructions) used by the ICD. The Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator ("ICD") can be set to use one wire (top or bottom of the heart) or two wires (top and bottom). The study will compare how much time either ICD wire is used by the ICD and the status of congestive heart failure.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Recent research supports the hypothesis that reducing the amount of pacing in the lower right chamber of the heart may prevent the progression of congestive heart failure (CHF) in some implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) patients. CHF refers to symptoms (shortness of breath, fatigue, fluid overload) caused by decreased pumping action of the heart muscle. The ICD can be set to use one wire (top or bottom of the heart) or two wires (top and bottom). Both settings allow the heart to beat more naturally using its own electrical signals. Two device settings will be compared. Managed ventricular pacing (MVP) will allow the ICD to use both wires only as necessary. This setting allows the ICD to send electrical signals to the top and bottom chambers of the heart if needed. The other setting, ventricular pacing (VVI) will allow the ICD to operate the bottom chamber of the heart if it is needed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Heart Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

VVI 40 pacing

Backup ventricular pacing (VVI) at 40 beats per minute

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

ICD (Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator)

Intervention Type DEVICE

VVI 40 vs. MVP

MVP pacing

Managed ventricular pacing (MVP) at 60 beats per minute

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

ICD (Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator)

Intervention Type DEVICE

VVI 40 vs. MVP

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ICD (Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator)

VVI 40 vs. MVP

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Intrinsic™ EnTrust™

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Conventional indication for ICD therapy according to current evidence-based guidelines and in accordance with the corresponding United States Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services National Coverage Determination for the use of ICDs.
* Prior myocardial infarction ("MI") and an left ventricular ejection fraction ("LVEF") of less than 30%
* Ischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy (IDCM), New York Heart Association ("NYHA") Class II or II heart failure, and LVEF less than or equal to 35%
* Non-Ischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy (NIDCM) greater than 3 months, NYHA Class II or II heart failure, and LVEF less than or equal to 35%
* First ICD implant
* Successful implant with a study device with approved labeling

* Class I pacing indication
* Chronic atrial fibrillation ("AF") without any documented sinus mechanism for at least 6 months
* Inability or unwillingness to give informed consent
* Life expectancy less than 12 months or a heart transplant anticipated within 6 months
* Inability to successfully comply with study participation and follow up requirements
* Patient involved in another clinical trial that may confound the results of the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medtronic

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Medtronic CRDM

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael O Sweeney

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Anchorage, Alaska, United States

Site Status

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

North Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Brandon, Florida, United States

Site Status

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Site Status

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Site Status

Naples, Florida, United States

Site Status

Pensacola, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Savannah, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Silver Spring, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Takoma Park, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Lansing, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Marquette, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Petoskey, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Coon Rapids, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

Hackensack, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Newark, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

New Hyde Park, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Gastonia, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Mayfield Hts., Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Taylorville, Utah, United States

Site Status

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Morgantown, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Sankt Pölten, , Austria

Site Status

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Ste-Foy, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Aarus, , Denmark

Site Status

Le Chesnay, , France

Site Status

Lille, , France

Site Status

Bad Berka, , Germany

Site Status

Franfurt Am Main, , Germany

Site Status

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

Homburg/Saar, , Germany

Site Status

Kiel, , Germany

Site Status

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Milano, , Israel

Site Status

Tel Aviv, , Israel

Site Status

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Tromsø, , Norway

Site Status

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Austria Canada Denmark France Germany Israel Italy Norway Spain Switzerland United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sweeney MO, Ellenbogen KA, Tang AS, Whellan D, Mortensen PT, Giraldi F, Sandler DA, Sherfesee L, Sheldon T; Managed Ventricular Pacing Versus VVI 40 Pacing Trial Investigators. Atrial pacing or ventricular backup-only pacing in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients. Heart Rhythm. 2010 Nov;7(11):1552-60. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.05.038. Epub 2010 Jun 4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 20685401 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

240

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Acute Defibrillation Study
NCT02227121 TERMINATED NA
The REACT-ICD Trial
NCT02439424 UNKNOWN PHASE1/PHASE2
Optimized Biventricular Pacing Allograft Recipients
NCT01290822 TERMINATED PHASE1/PHASE2