Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
1031 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2004-10-31
2008-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Optimize RV Selective Site Pacing Clinical Trial
NCT00422669
Dual Site Left Ventricular (LV) Pacing
NCT00944125
Optimal Pacing Rate for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
NCT06445439
PreFER Managed Ventricular Pacing (MVP) For Elective Replacement
NCT00293241
Right Apical Versus Septal Pacing Trial
NCT00199498
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
VVI 40 pacing
Backup ventricular pacing (VVI) at 40 beats per minute
ICD (Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator)
VVI 40 vs. MVP
MVP pacing
Managed ventricular pacing (MVP) at 60 beats per minute
ICD (Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator)
VVI 40 vs. MVP
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ICD (Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator)
VVI 40 vs. MVP
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Prior myocardial infarction ("MI") and an left ventricular ejection fraction ("LVEF") of less than 30%
* Ischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy (IDCM), New York Heart Association ("NYHA") Class II or II heart failure, and LVEF less than or equal to 35%
* Non-Ischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy (NIDCM) greater than 3 months, NYHA Class II or II heart failure, and LVEF less than or equal to 35%
* First ICD implant
* Successful implant with a study device with approved labeling
* Class I pacing indication
* Chronic atrial fibrillation ("AF") without any documented sinus mechanism for at least 6 months
* Inability or unwillingness to give informed consent
* Life expectancy less than 12 months or a heart transplant anticipated within 6 months
* Inability to successfully comply with study participation and follow up requirements
* Patient involved in another clinical trial that may confound the results of the study
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medtronic
INDUSTRY
Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Medtronic CRDM
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael O Sweeney
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
North Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Brandon, Florida, United States
Clearwater, Florida, United States
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States
Naples, Florida, United States
Pensacola, Florida, United States
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Savannah, Georgia, United States
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Des Moines, Iowa, United States
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Silver Spring, Maryland, United States
Takoma Park, Maryland, United States
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Lansing, Michigan, United States
Marquette, Michigan, United States
Petoskey, Michigan, United States
Coon Rapids, Minnesota, United States
Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
Hackensack, New Jersey, United States
Newark, New Jersey, United States
New Hyde Park, New York, United States
New York, New York, United States
Gastonia, North Carolina, United States
Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
Mayfield Hts., Ohio, United States
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Columbia, South Carolina, United States
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Austin, Texas, United States
Fort Worth, Texas, United States
Houston, Texas, United States
Taylorville, Utah, United States
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
Norfolk, Virginia, United States
Richmond, Virginia, United States
Morgantown, West Virginia, United States
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Sankt Pölten, , Austria
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Ste-Foy, Quebec, Canada
Aarus, , Denmark
Le Chesnay, , France
Lille, , France
Bad Berka, , Germany
Franfurt Am Main, , Germany
Heidelberg, , Germany
Homburg/Saar, , Germany
Kiel, , Germany
Haifa, , Israel
Milano, , Israel
Tel Aviv, , Israel
Milan, , Italy
Tromsø, , Norway
Valencia, , Spain
Zurich, , Switzerland
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sweeney MO, Ellenbogen KA, Tang AS, Whellan D, Mortensen PT, Giraldi F, Sandler DA, Sherfesee L, Sheldon T; Managed Ventricular Pacing Versus VVI 40 Pacing Trial Investigators. Atrial pacing or ventricular backup-only pacing in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients. Heart Rhythm. 2010 Nov;7(11):1552-60. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.05.038. Epub 2010 Jun 4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
240
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.