Resynchronization for Ambulatory Heart Failure Trial - LV Endocardial

NCT ID: NCT02757976

Last Updated: 2020-09-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

8 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-03-08

Study Completion Date

2019-06-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This trial will compare two strategies for patients with Heart Failure, Left Ventricular systolic dysfunction, and intermediate QRS durations. The control group is conventional CRT. The experimental group is LVendo CRT

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients randomized to the Conventional CRT will receive a CRT device with or without ICD. Device implantation will be performed within 10 working days of randomization.

Patients randomized to LV endocardial CRT will receive a CRT device with or without ICD, placed in the same time frame and will have RA and RV leads implanted as the conventional CRT group. The device will be implanted in a facility that has the capacity to perform trans-atrial septal puncture with ultrasound guidance. The LV lead will be placed using a trans-atrial septal approach using a specially designed puncture tools and LVendo delivery tool kits specifically designed for this study

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Heart Failure, Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This trial will compare two management strategies for patients with Heart Failure, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and intermediate prolonged QRS duration (120-149ms). The control group is conventional Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT). The experimental group is LV endocardial CRT.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Conventional CRT

Patients randomized to the Conventional CRT will receive a CRT device with or without ICD. Device implantation will be performed within 10 working days of randomization. Conscious sedation or general anesthesia can be used for the implant procedure. The device will be implanted in a facility that has the capacity to perform coronary sinus venography at the time of implantation. The RA lead will be placed in the RA appendage or high RA. The RV lead should be placed at the RV apex or distal RV septum (R wave \> 7 mV, pacing threshold \< 1.5 V at a pulse-width of 0.5 ms). The LV lead should be positioned through the CS to an LV branch. The lead should be placed at one of the left ventricular venous branches, avoiding the LV apex and scar region identified by pre-implant imaging

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional CRT

Intervention Type DEVICE

Patients randomized to the Conventional CRT will receive a CRT device with or without ICD. Device implantation will be performed within 10 working days of randomization. Conscious sedation or general anesthesia can be used for the implant procedure. The device will be implanted in a facility that has the capacity to perform coronary sinus venography at the time of implantation. The RA lead will be placed in the RA appendage or high RA. The RV lead should be placed at the RV apex or distal RV septum (R wave \> 7 mV, pacing threshold \< 1.5 V at a pulse-width of 0.5 ms). The LV lead should be positioned through the CS to an LV branch. The lead should be placed at one of the left ventricular venous branches, avoiding the LV apex and scar region identified by pre-implant imaging.

LV endocardial CRT

Patients randomized to LV endocardial CRT will receive a CRT device with or without ICD, placed in the same time frame, and will have RA and RV leads implanted as the conventional CRT group. The device will be implanted in a facility that has the capacity to perform trans-atrial septal puncture with ultrasound guidance (TEE or ICE) at the time of implantation. The LV lead will be placed using a trans-atrial septal approach, using a specially designed puncture tools and LVendo delivery tool kits specifically designed for this study. Special care will be taken to avoid the LV apex and transmural scar identified by pre-implant imaging.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

LV endocardial CRT

Intervention Type DEVICE

Patients randomized to LV endocardial CRT will receive a CRT device with or without ICD, placed in the same time frame, and will have RA and RV leads implanted as the conventional CRT group. The device will be implanted in a facility that has the capacity to perform trans-atrial septal puncture with ultrasound guidance (TEE or ICE) at the time of implantation. The LV lead will be placed using a trans-atrial septal approach, using a specially designed puncture tools and LVendo delivery tool kits specifically designed for this study. Special care will be taken to avoid the LV apex and transmural scar identified by pre-implant imaging.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Conventional CRT

Patients randomized to the Conventional CRT will receive a CRT device with or without ICD. Device implantation will be performed within 10 working days of randomization. Conscious sedation or general anesthesia can be used for the implant procedure. The device will be implanted in a facility that has the capacity to perform coronary sinus venography at the time of implantation. The RA lead will be placed in the RA appendage or high RA. The RV lead should be placed at the RV apex or distal RV septum (R wave \> 7 mV, pacing threshold \< 1.5 V at a pulse-width of 0.5 ms). The LV lead should be positioned through the CS to an LV branch. The lead should be placed at one of the left ventricular venous branches, avoiding the LV apex and scar region identified by pre-implant imaging.

Intervention Type DEVICE

LV endocardial CRT

Patients randomized to LV endocardial CRT will receive a CRT device with or without ICD, placed in the same time frame, and will have RA and RV leads implanted as the conventional CRT group. The device will be implanted in a facility that has the capacity to perform trans-atrial septal puncture with ultrasound guidance (TEE or ICE) at the time of implantation. The LV lead will be placed using a trans-atrial septal approach, using a specially designed puncture tools and LVendo delivery tool kits specifically designed for this study. Special care will be taken to avoid the LV apex and transmural scar identified by pre-implant imaging.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with NYHA Class II or III or ambulatory IV HF symptoms
* Optimal HF Medical Therapy of at least 3 months (2009 ACCF/AHA, ESC 2012)
* LVEF less than or equal to 35%
* Sinus rhythm (can have paroxysmal atrial fibrillation)
* QRS morphology is non-RBBB
* QRS durations more than or equal to 120 ms, but less than 150 ms
* Patients are able to receive chronic oral anticoagulation
* Patients with pacemaker or ICD that meet the above criteria may be upgraded to CRT-D or CRT-P

Exclusion Criteria

* Planned Atrial Fibrillation Ablation within 12 months
* Patients with mitral or tricuspid prosthetic valve that precludes the placement of an LV lead transvenously or trans-septally
* Patients with RBBB
* Patients with LV thrombus
* Patients with permanent atrial fibrillation
* Patients with contraindications to oral anti-coagulation
* In-hospital patients with acute cardiac or non-cardiac illness that requires intensive care
* Acute coronary syndrome (including MI) \< 4 weeks
* Coronary revascularization (CABG or PCI) \< 3 months
* Uncorrected or uncorrectable primary valvular disease
* Restrictive, hypertrophic or reversible form of cardiomyopathy
* Severe primary pulmonary disease such as cor pulmonale
* Expected to undergo cardiac transplantation within one year (status I)
* Patients with a life expectancy of less than one year from non-cardiac cause.
* Patients included in other clinical trials that will affect the objectives of this study
* Those unable or unwilling to provide informed consent
* Those with a history of noncompliance to medical therapy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medtronic

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Libin Cardiovascular Institute

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Royal Columbia Hospital

New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Vancouver General Hospital

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Queen Elizabeth II Health Science

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

London Health Science Centre

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

University of Ottawa Heart Institute

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

St. Michael Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

McGill University Health Centre

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Montreal Heart Institute

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Institut Univ.cardiologie/pneumologie de Québec

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

CHUS Le Centre hospitalier universitaire de Sherbrooke

Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

252410

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

LV Only MPP With SyncAV
NCT03567096 COMPLETED NA