Evaluation of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing As A Rescue Strategy for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Non-Response
NCT ID: NCT05884411
Last Updated: 2025-08-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-04-30
2025-08-05
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Non-Invasive Method for Evaluation of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
NCT05868616
Left Bundle Branch Pacing on Outcomes and Ventricular Remodeling in Biventricular CRT Nonresponders
NCT05760924
Predicting Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Heart Failure
NCT00359372
Pilot Study Using Echocardiography to Evaluate Patients With Heart Failure and Dyssynchrony Who Have a CRT-D Device
NCT01127334
Safety and Effectiveness of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Versus Conventional Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Heart Failure
NCT07069738
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A critical limitation of traditional CRT is that the leads do not directly utilize the heart's intrinsic conduction tissue, called the His-Purkinje system. An extensive web of conduction tissue capable of transmitting the electrical signals all over the ventricles within milliseconds, the His-Purkinje system conducts electrical stimuli much faster than conduction through a usual myocardial cell. The left bundle branch is a component of the His-Purkinje system. As such, electrophysiologic therapies that directly activate the left bundle branch area (LBBAP) have emerged as possible solutions to the problem of non-response to CRT. Although data suggests that in patients with complete LBBB, LBBAP can better optimize electrical synchrony and improve cardiac function compared to traditional bi-ventricular CRT, the efficacy has not been studied in CRT non-responders.
Currently, the most frequently used technique for assessment of the left ventricle is echocardiography because it is widely available. However, several studies have demonstrated that cardiac MRI (CMR) is superior to echocardiography in measuring left ventricle ejection fraction, particularly in terms of interstudy reproducibility. Recent studies have also demonstrated CMR imaging to be safe even in patients with non-MRI-conditional pacemakers and defibrillators. Studies have also observed that patients undergoing MRI with non-MRI-conditional pacemakers or ICDs neither experienced device/lead failure nor were they at increased risk by undergoing MRI. Despite established safety of CMR in patients with cardiac devices, it is not being routinely performed because there are concerns that the devices will cause field inhomogeneity resulting in magnetic susceptibility artifacts and non-diagnostic image quality. However, these concerns are overcome by utilizing contemporary imaging protocols with gradient echo sequences as opposed to standard steady-state free precession. By using these new protocols for CMR in this study, the investigators aim to establish the feasibility of CMR to prospectively assess cardiac function at baseline and during follow-up in patients with cardiac devices (i.e. that the image quality in subjects with implantable devices is adequate and not undermined by image artifact).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
LBBAP
This arm will investigate improvement in cardiac function following placement of the LBBA pacing electrode in half the patients.
Left bundle branch area pacing
A cardiac pacing electrode is inserted into the left bundle branch area of the myocardium via a transvenous approach.
Cardiac MRI with devices
This arm will investigate the feasibility of cardiac MRI to be used to measure cardiac function in patients with cardiac devices.
Cardiac MRI
A diagnostic imaging test using magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate cardiac function.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Left bundle branch area pacing
A cardiac pacing electrode is inserted into the left bundle branch area of the myocardium via a transvenous approach.
Cardiac MRI
A diagnostic imaging test using magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate cardiac function.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Lack of improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class
* Lack of LVEF increase by \> 5%
* Lack of decrease in LVESV by \> 15%
Exclusion Criteria
* Unable or unwilling to participate in the protocol or comply with any of its components
* Pregnant women
* Known cancer patients, actively receiving chemotherapy
* Patients unable to pass MRI safety screening (intra-orbital metallic foreign bodies, severe claustrophobia, etc)
* Patients with anatomical difficulties for implanting LBBAP
* Patients with high risk of procedure-related infection
* Immunocompromised patients
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
VA Office of Research and Development
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Selma D Carlson, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CX002525
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CARA-001-22F
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.