Dual-Site LV Pacing in CRT Non Responders: Multicenter Randomized Trial

NCT ID: NCT01059175

Last Updated: 2025-07-02

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

84 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-09-30

Study Completion Date

2014-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an effective treatment of heart failure (HF) refractory to optimal medical management, in presence of a depressed left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction and a wide QRS complex. It is mainly limited by a high proportion of non-responders. Attempts have been made, in small studies, to increase the number of stimulation sites in order to optimize the resynchronization therapy. V3 is a planned multicenter, randomized trial whose objective is to evaluate the clinical benefit conferred by the addition of a second endocardial or epicardial LV lead in non-responders after at least 6 months of standard biventricular stimulation.

The V3 trial will examine the clinical benefit conferred by the addition of a second LV lead in non-responders compared to standard CRT.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Heart Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CRT With Dual Site LV Pacing

Cardiac resynchronization therapy with the addition of a second LV lead. Positioning of a pacing lead in a cardiac vein should be considered first. An epicardial lead will be used if the implant of an endocardial lead is impossible or previously failed.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Additional Endocardial or Epicardial LV Lead

Intervention Type DEVICE

Addition of a second left ventricular endocardial or epicardial lead

CRT-P or CRT-D

Intervention Type DEVICE

Implantable Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Pacemaker (CRT-P) or Defibrillator (CRT-D) Device

Standard CRT

Conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy. Patients in this arm will keep their CRT system unchanged.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

CRT-P or CRT-D

Intervention Type DEVICE

Implantable Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Pacemaker (CRT-P) or Defibrillator (CRT-D) Device

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Additional Endocardial or Epicardial LV Lead

Addition of a second left ventricular endocardial or epicardial lead

Intervention Type DEVICE

CRT-P or CRT-D

Implantable Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Pacemaker (CRT-P) or Defibrillator (CRT-D) Device

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age greater than 18 years
* Recipient of a CRT-P or CRT-D system for greater than 6 for standard indications, including LV ejection fraction greater than 35 percent and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class III or IV
* Optimized biventricular stimulation and medical therapy since implantation of the system
* Presence of sinus rhythm, or atrial fibrillation with spontaneous or induced complete atrio-ventricular block
* Greater than 93 percent LV stimulation since the last device interrogation, with a LV capture threshold less than 5.0 Volts/0.5 milliseconds
* Unchanged or worsened clinical status by CRT, according to the HF composite endpoint described by M. Packer, in absence of a reversible cause
* Signature of a written, informed consent to participate in the trial

Exclusion Criteria

* LV lead location in the great cardiac vein
* Life-expectancy less than 1 year due to concomitant, non-cardiovascular disorders
* Chronic renal dialysis
* Concomitant disorder which might interfere with the results of the V3 trial
* Blood systolic pressure greater than 180 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) or diastolic pressure greater than 95 mmHg despite optimal medical management
* History of stroke, myocardial infarction or unstable angina pectoris within the last 3 months
* Presence of correctible valvular disease
* Subject unable to attend follow-up at the investigative center or unable, for physical or mental reasons, to comply with the trial's procedures, or to sign the informed consent
* Subject is pregnant
* Subject participates in another research project
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medtronic

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

FRANCE

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bordachar, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Bordeaux

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University hospital Rennes

Rennes, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bordachar P, Alonso C, Anselme F, Boveda S, Defaye P, Garrigue S, Gras D, Klug D, Piot O, Sadoul N, Leclercq C. Addition of a second LV pacing site in CRT nonresponders rationale and design of the multicenter randomized V(3) trial. J Card Fail. 2010 Sep;16(9):709-13. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2010.04.010. Epub 2010 Jun 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20797593 (View on PubMed)

Bordachar P, Gras D, Clementy N, Defaye P, Mondoly P, Boveda S, Anselme F, Klug D, Piot O, Sadoul N, Babuty D, Leclercq C. Clinical impact of an additional left ventricular lead in cardiac resynchronization therapy nonresponders: The V3 trial. Heart Rhythm. 2018 Jun;15(6):870-876. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.12.028. Epub 2017 Dec 26.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29288035 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Medtronic

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pacing in Heart Failure With Preserved LVEF
NCT03215849 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA