A Study Testing a New Heart Scan Method to Improve Pacemaker Treatment for Heart Failure
NCT ID: NCT07084467
Last Updated: 2025-08-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
400 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-08-01
2030-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The purpose of this study is to examine whether this new measurement (EF1) can predict outcomes and response to CRT treatment.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy In Patients With Heart Failure: Mechanistic Insights From Cardiac MRI And Electroanatomical Mapping
NCT04322877
Tailoring Pacemaker Output to Physiology in Chronic Heart Failure
NCT03781427
CRT In Narrow QRS Heart Failure: Mechanistic Insights From Cardiac MRI And Electroanatomical Mapping
NCT03258060
Pacing for Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
NCT01045291
Predicting Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Heart Failure
NCT00359372
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard of Care
Standard of Care (SOC)
This group will receive standard of care for their health condition and CRT management.
EF1 optimisation
EF1 guided CRT optimisation
In the EF1-guided optimisation group, the settings of the CRT device are adjusted to maximise early heart pumping efficiency, measured by a parameter called first-phase ejection fraction (EF1). Depending on the patient's heart rhythm, either the timing between heart chambers (AV or VV delay) is adjusted in small steps. The device setting that gives the best EF1 reading is chosen to help improve the heart's response to CRT.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
EF1 guided CRT optimisation
In the EF1-guided optimisation group, the settings of the CRT device are adjusted to maximise early heart pumping efficiency, measured by a parameter called first-phase ejection fraction (EF1). Depending on the patient's heart rhythm, either the timing between heart chambers (AV or VV delay) is adjusted in small steps. The device setting that gives the best EF1 reading is chosen to help improve the heart's response to CRT.
Standard of Care (SOC)
This group will receive standard of care for their health condition and CRT management.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* On optimal medical therapy for heart failure
* Meets standard guideline criteria for CRT (including conduction system pacing), specifically:
* NYHA class II to IV
* Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) ≤ 35%
* QRS duration \> 130 ms
Exclusion Criteria
* Major cardiovascular event within the past 6 weeks
* More than mild aortic stenosis
* Receiving continuous or intermittent infusion therapy for heart failure
* Poor ultrasound acoustic window preventing adequate imaging
* Unable to give informed consent
* Currently participating in another interventional study
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER
The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
OTHER
King's College Hospital NHS Trust
OTHER
Barts Helth NHS Trust
UNKNOWN
King's College London
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
London, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gu H, Li Y, Fok H, Simpson J, Kentish JC, Shah AM, Chowienczyk PJ. Reduced First-Phase Ejection Fraction and Sustained Myocardial Wall Stress in Hypertensive Patients With Diastolic Dysfunction: A Manifestation of Impaired Shortening Deactivation That Links Systolic to Diastolic Dysfunction and Preserves Systolic Ejection Fraction. Hypertension. 2017 Apr;69(4):633-640. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.08545. Epub 2017 Feb 21.
Gu H, Sidhu BS, Fang L, Webb J, Jackson T, Claridge S, Einarsen E, Razavi R, Papageorgiou N, Chow A, Bhattacharyya S, Chowienczyk P, Rinaldi CA. First-Phase Ejection Fraction Predicts Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Adverse Outcomes. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Dec;14(12):2275-2285. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.05.007.
Gu H, Cirillo C, Nabeebaccus AA, Sun Z, Fang L, Xie Y, Demir O, Desai N, He L, Lu Q, Nakou E, O'Gallagher K, Tountas C, Marvaki A, Monaghan M, Perera D, Pericao A, Ryan M, Sinclair H, Stylianidis V, Victor K, Wang B, Wang J, Wang R, Wu C, Yang Y, Yuan H, Zhang D, Zhang Y, Faconti L, Papachristidis A, Zhang L, Carr-White G, Shah AM, Xie M, Chowienczyk P. First-Phase Ejection Fraction, a Measure of Preclinical Heart Failure, Is Strongly Associated With Increased Mortality in Patients With COVID-19. Hypertension. 2021 Jun;77(6):2014-2022. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.17099. Epub 2021 May 10.
Bing R, Gu H, Chin C, Fang L, White A, Everett RJ, Spath NB, Park E, Jenkins WS, Shah AS, Mills NL, Flapan AD, Chambers JB, Newby DE, Chowienczyk P, Dweck MR. Determinants and prognostic value of echocardiographic first-phase ejection fraction in aortic stenosis. Heart. 2020 Aug;106(16):1236-1243. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-316684. Epub 2020 Apr 28.
Gu H, Saeed S, Boguslavskyi A, Carr-White G, Chambers JB, Chowienczyk P. First-Phase Ejection Fraction Is a Powerful Predictor of Adverse Events in Asymptomatic Patients With Aortic Stenosis and Preserved Total Ejection Fraction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jan;12(1):52-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.08.037. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, Butler J, Casey DE Jr, Colvin MM, Drazner MH, Filippatos GS, Fonarow GC, Givertz MM, Hollenberg SM, Lindenfeld J, Masoudi FA, McBride PE, Peterson PN, Stevenson LW, Westlake C. 2017 ACC/AHA/HFSA Focused Update of the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Failure Society of America. Circulation. 2017 Aug 8;136(6):e137-e161. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000509. Epub 2017 Apr 28. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
25/LO/0562
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.