Triple Site Ventricular Stimulation for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) Candidates

NCT ID: NCT00887237

Last Updated: 2013-07-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

76 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-05-31

Study Completion Date

2012-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Despite technological progresses the rate of non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remains close to 30%. This inconsistent effect of CRT might be due to incomplete resynchronization as dyssynchrony can persist in 25% to 30% of patients during CRT.

One might hypothesize that stimulating the ventricles at a single site is suboptimal and that stimulating multiple left ventricular (LV) or right ventricular (RV) sites may improve ventricular resynchronization and, consequently, its hemodynamic and clinical effects. First studies have suggested that 1 RV + 2 LV pacing sites configurations increased significantly dP/dt, pulse pressure, LV end-diastolic pressure, and is associated with more LV remodeling and better responder rate compared with pacing a single LV site. First studies with 2 RV+LV pacing sites configuration demonstrated increased dP/dt and cardiac output and a decrease of the cardiac dyssynchrony.

The present pilot trial was designed to examine the 6-month safety of biventricular stimulation with 2 right ventricular (RV) and 1 left ventricular (LV) leads - main objective- and to assess its clinical benefit.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Heart Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

TRIV

Cardiac resynchronization with triple site ventricular stimulation (2 RV leads and 1 LV lead)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CRT with triple site ventricular stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

CRT with triple site ventricular stimulation (2 RV leads and 1 LV lead)

BIV

Conventional cardiac resynchronization

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional cardiac resynchronization

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional cardiac resynchronization

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CRT with triple site ventricular stimulation

CRT with triple site ventricular stimulation (2 RV leads and 1 LV lead)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional cardiac resynchronization

Conventional cardiac resynchronization

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Signed informed consent
* \> 18 years old
* Cardiac resynchronization indication : New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III/IV \& QRS width \> 120 ms milliseconds (ms) OR NYHA class II \& QRS width \> 150 ms
* Sinus rhythm
* First implant procedure

Exclusion Criteria

* Permanent ventricular tachycardia
* Permanent pacing indication for 3rd degree atrioventricular (AV) block
* Diagnosed or suspected acute myocarditis
* Less than 1 year life expectancy related to a non-cardiovascular disease
* Impossibility to perform follow-up in the investigative center
* Pregnant woman
* Patient which may not cooperate to study procedures as evaluated by investigator
* Legally protected adult patient or patient unable to give an informed consent
* Patient enrolled in an other clinical trial
* Patient which does not benefit from a social protection system
* Renal insufficiency
* Patient registered on a heart transplant waiting list
* Disease and/or health condition which may interfere with study results
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Frederic Anselme, Pr

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Rouen

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University hospital of Bordeaux

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

University hospital of Lille

Lille, , France

Site Status

University hospital La Timone

Marseille, , France

Site Status

University hospital of Montpellier

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

University hospital of Nancy

Nancy, , France

Site Status

Nouvelles Cliniques Nantaises

Nantes, , France

Site Status

University hospital of Nantes

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Clinique Bizet

Paris, , France

Site Status

University Hospital of Rennes

Rennes, , France

Site Status

University hospital of Rouen

Rouen, , France

Site Status

Centre Cardiologique du Nord

Saint-Denis, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Saint Louis

La Rochelle, Île-de-France Region, France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Anselme F, Bordachar P, Pasquie JL, Klug D, Leclercq C, Milhem A, Alonso C, Deharo JC, Gras D, Probst V, Piot O, Savoure A. Safety, feasibility, and outcome results of cardiac resynchronization with triple-site ventricular stimulation compared to conventional cardiac resynchronization. Heart Rhythm. 2016 Jan;13(1):183-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.08.036. Epub 2015 Sep 26.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26325531 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TRIV

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.