TARGET-LOAD Pilot Study Comparing Hemodynamics-guided LVAD Unloading Vs. Standard of Care

NCT ID: NCT04977310

Last Updated: 2024-12-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-03-31

Study Completion Date

2026-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is a prospective, randomized-controlled, non-blinded, multi-center, pilot trial to compare standard-of-care left ventricular assist device (LVAD) unloading plus heart failure (HF) medications reverse-remodeling management versus hemodynamics-guided LVAD unloading with use of the wireless monitoring system CardioMEMS plus HF medications reverse-remodeling management.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

LVADs are being increasingly used in end-stage heart failure patients as a bridge to transplant (BTT) or as a destination therapy (DT). Although LVAD recipients are considered to be optimally unloaded with speed optimizations following LVAD implantation, re-hospitalizations due to HF recurrence are far from negligible. Recent studies have reported that at least 35% of hospital readmissions post-LVAD implantation are due to HF exacerbations, volume status changes or other cardiac causes (arrhythmias etc.). This suggests that patients are being sub-optimally unloaded and/or taking inadequate medical therapy and probably this decreases the chances for potential reverse remodeling and myocardial recovery. Moreover, a recent study demonstrated that cardiac dimensions obtained from echocardiography do not adequately reflect the degree of mechanical unloading of the heart. It has also shown strong evidence that pulmonary artery (PA) pressures monitoring can be reliably used to assess the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP).

Symptomatic heart failure exacerbation requiring hospital admission may lie at the end of a spectrum of worsening hemodynamics that are unable to be detected before the manifestation of symptoms and limits the potential for myocardial recovery. Therefore, it is proposed that repeatedly adjusting LVAD pump flow speed and tailoring standard HF medications depending on the patient's PA pressure acquired from the CardioMEMS device can optimize pressure and volume unloading and promote reverse cardiac remodeling and recovery.

Clinical experience with LVAD support has shown that a subset of LVAD patients can experience reverse cardiac remodeling and significant improvement of myocardial function suggesting that LVAD-induced mechanical unloading of the failing heart may be a plausible therapeutic strategy aiming at myocardial recovery and device removal. These explanted patients have shown "myocardial plasticity" in clinical studies and that they can be responsive and sensitive to load changes. These patients will be carefully monitored to prevent increased load and wall stress to drive again the detrimental spiral of cardiac remodeling and HF recurrence, which appears to be the case in at least one third of LVAD patients after device weaning. Along the same lines, the results from another clinical study showed a significant and large reduction in hospitalization for HF patients who were managed with CardioMEMS. Therefore, further improvement of patients' HF management will depend mainly on better identification and pro-active management of their fluid and hemodynamic status. It is proposed that chronically adjusting HF medications using CardioMEMS-guided hemodynamic assessment in patients who have weaned from LVAD support could improve long-term durability of cardiac improvement after LVAD weaning.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Heart Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control

After LVAD implantation, patients undergo cardiac rehab and pump speed will be optimized to maximize left ventricular unloading using echocardiographic imaging and other standard-of-care practices. During the Unloading phase, patients are serially evaluated with echocardiograms to assess for cardiac recovery, and LVAD explantation performed when predefined criteria are met. After explantation, patients undergo cardiac rehab and regular follow up.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Intervention

After LVAD and wireless monitoring system (CardioMEMS) implantation, patients undergo cardiac rehab and pump speed will be optimized to maximize left ventricular unloading using CardioMEMS. During the Unloading phase, invasive hemodynamic guidance (via CardioMEMS) will be utilized to optimize pressure and volume unloading along with serial echocardiographic evaluations to assess for cardiac recovery, and LVAD explantation will be considered. After explantation, patients will undergo cardiac rehab and regular follow up with adjustments of HF medications based on the CardioMEMS-guided hemodynamic assessment.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CardioMEMS

Intervention Type DEVICE

Cardio-MEMS-guided Post-LVAD cardiac unloading and recovery

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CardioMEMS

Cardio-MEMS-guided Post-LVAD cardiac unloading and recovery

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Severe clinical HF resistant to intensive medical therapy and requiring LVAD implantation
* Left ventricular ejection fraction \<=25% and cardiomegaly at time of LVAD implantation
* Non-ischemic etiology of HF
* Undergone LVAD implantation within prior 4 weeks or planned for LVAD implant
* History of HF \< 5 years
* Body Mass Index \<=35 kg/m\^2
* Pulmonary artery branch diameter between 7 - 15 mm
* Female subjects of childbearing age with negative urine or serum pregnancy test and agreeing to use reliable mechanical or hormonal form of contraception during study

Exclusion Criteria

* Evidence of active acute myocarditis confirmed by histology
* History of previous cerebrovascular accident resulting in significant fixed motor deficit, limiting ability to perform exercise testing
* Implanted mechanical aortic and/or mitral valve(s) and/or right heart valve(s)
* Aortic valve closure
* Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy or sarcoidosis
* Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter below normal (restrictive cardiomyopathy)
* Irreversible multi-organ failure
* Diagnosis of psychiatric disease, irreversible cognitive dysfunction or poor psycho-social issues likely to impair compliance with study protocol
* Any condition that could limit survival to less than 2 years
* History of cardiac or other organ transplant
* Contraindicated to anti-coagulation, antiplatelet therapy, or diagnosis of coagulation disorders
* Require acute or chronic renal replacement therapy within 3 months prior to enrollment
* Participation in any other clinical investigations involving another Mechanical Circulating Support device or HF-related drug
* Active infection
* History of recurrent (\>1) pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis
* Unable to tolerate right heart catheterization
* Implantation of cardiac re-synchronization therapy \< 3 months before enrollment
* Congenital heart disease
* Hypersensitivity or allergy to aspirin and/or clopidogrel
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Abbott

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

STAVROS G DRAKOS

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

STAVROS G DRAKOS

Professor, Cardiovascular Medicine

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stavros Drakos, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Utah

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Kentucky

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Inova Heart and Vascular Institute

Falls Church, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB_00143654

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id