Comparison of Epicardial Versus Conventional Lead Placement in Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

NCT ID: NCT01302470

Last Updated: 2015-02-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-02-28

Study Completion Date

2012-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary goal of this study is to evaluate the use of robotically -assisted device leads as a primary strategy for heart resynchronization.This trials aims to compare transvenous lead placement with robotic lead placement for cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A secondary goal is to explore the link between efficacy of CRT and inotropic contractile reserve as measured by dobutamine stress echocardiography.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Heart Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Robotic placement of CS lead

CS leads placed epicardially in the area of increased dyssynchrony as demonstrated by low dose dobutamine stress testing.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Primary epicardial placement of left ventricular lead

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Epicardial leads will be placed on the left ventricle in the area of the most dyssynchrony . the leads will be attached to a Medtronic Cardiac resynchronization/ AICD/ device

Transvenous placement of CS lead

CS lead will be placed transvenously

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Transvenous placement of left ventricular lead

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Conventional placement of left ventricular leads performed in the electrophysiology department.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Primary epicardial placement of left ventricular lead

Epicardial leads will be placed on the left ventricle in the area of the most dyssynchrony . the leads will be attached to a Medtronic Cardiac resynchronization/ AICD/ device

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Transvenous placement of left ventricular lead

Conventional placement of left ventricular leads performed in the electrophysiology department.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

cardiac resynchronization therapy Cardiac resynchronization Therapy CRT/ AICD

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Symptomatic NYHA class III or IV heart failure from idiopathic or ischemic heart failure
* QRS interval greater than or equal to 130 msec
* Left ventricular end diastolic diameter greater than or equal to 55 mm
* left ventricular ejection fraction less than or equal to 35
* Willingness to participate

Exclusion Criteria

* Acute renal failure; active GI bleeding; unexplained fever which may be due to an infection
* untreated active infection
* acute stroke
* severe uncontrolled systemic hypertension
* severe systemic electrolyte imbalance
* severe concomitant illness that drastically shortens life expectancy
* severe coagulopathy
* history of severe COPD and inability to tolerate single lung ventilation
* History of prior left sided thoracotomy
* history of recent intravenous drug use
* concomitant psychiatric diagnosis that impairs patient's ability to comply with study protocol
* participation in another investigational protocol
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Montefiore Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

St.Lukes-Roosevelt Hospital

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

04-052

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

CareLink Express (CLE Research)
NCT03223207 COMPLETED