Optimized Biventricular Pacing Allograft Recipients

NCT ID: NCT01290822

Last Updated: 2016-10-06

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Total Enrollment

12 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-01-31

Study Completion Date

2011-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study tests optimization of biventricular pacing (BiVP) in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) or ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) during cardiac transplantation in patients with advanced cardiac failure. It examines the effects of atrioventricular delay (AVD), interventricular delay (VVD or RLD), and left ventricular pacing site (LVPS) on cardiac output (CO). BiVP results are compared to traditional atrial (AAI) pacing at an identical heart rate.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study is designed to increase the benefit of biventricular pacing (BiVP), which is an established therapy for advanced heart failure. The investigators will test 6 left ventricular (LV) pacing sites and 16 timing sequences in the operating room just before cardiac transplant. Pacing will be implemented after patients have been anticoagulated and connected to the heart-lung machine. Pacing by previously implanted pacemakers will be suppressed. The investigators will measure cardiac output (CO) by aortic flow probe (AFP), left ventricular (LV) contractility by a combination of trans-septal pressure gradients, and simultaneous left ventricular pressure (LVP)and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) during transient reduction of inflow of blood to the heart by vena caval occlusion. The goal is to prove that this optimization will increase the amount of blood pumped by the failing heart by 15% as compared with standard atrial (AAI) pacing. The testing protocol is 12.5 minutes in duration, and the entire protocol should be executable in 20 minutes. Care will not be altered otherwise. Results will improve management of the general population of patients with advanced heart failure while minimally increasing the risk to patients undergoing cardiac transplantation. Benefits of this study should include: improved patient selection for BiVP and a decrease in the presently recognized 30-40% incidence of BiVP nonresponders.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dilated Cardiomyopathy Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

BiVP Pacing

BIVP optimize AVD, VVD, and LVPS parameters and assess the effect on cardiac output.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

BiVP

Intervention Type DEVICE

Biventricular pacing

AAI Pacing

Traditional atrial (AAI) pacing

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

AAI Pacing

Intervention Type DEVICE

Atrial pacing

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

BiVP

Biventricular pacing

Intervention Type DEVICE

AAI Pacing

Atrial pacing

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Biventricular Pacing Atrial Pacing

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* New York Heart Association (NYHA) heart failure class III/IV
* Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) \<36%
* QRS \>120 msec

Exclusion Criteria

* Intracardiac shunts
* Sinus tachycardia \>120 bpm
* Second or third degree heart block
* Previous cardiac surgery
* Mechanical circulatory assistance
* Atrial fibrillation
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Henry M. Spotnitz

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Henry M. Spotnitz

George H. Humphreys, II Professor of Surgery

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Henry M Spotnitz, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Columbia University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Columbia University Medial Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1R01HL080152-01A2

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

AAAC1492

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.