Post-market Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized and Single-blinded Clinical Investigation to Evaluate Whether Cardiac Re-Synchronization Therapy (CRT) Using Automatic Continuous Atrioventricular (AV) Delay Optimization is Superior to CRT With Conventional Biventricular Stimulation (BiV).

NCT ID: NCT06044597

Last Updated: 2023-09-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

722 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-10-01

Study Completion Date

2026-10-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this randomized, multicenter prospective study is to demonstrate that the activation of biventricular pacing with fusion and AV optimization feature will increase the rate of CRT responders in terms of LV reverse remodeling, compared with conventional biventricular pacing.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Treatment of HFrEF with CRT. CRT is an established guideline-recommended treatment for patients who are refractory to optimized pharmacologic therapy, and have reduced ejection fraction and increased QRS duration. It works by restoring atrioventricular, inter- and intra-ventricular synchrony and in so doing, it has been shown to improve symptoms, LV systolic function and survival. Nevertheless, a significant proportion of patients (30-45%) do not benefit after CRT and are considered non-respondent. Non-response to CRT is multifactorial (poor substrate to resynchronize, difficulty in the implant, age, gender, aetiology, and/or comorbidities). Recently, other negative determinants have been identified as cause of non-responding to CRT such as the lack of fusion of ventricular contraction with the intrinsic right ventricular conduction and non-optimal AV delay programming which, in turn, is related to the duration of PR interval. Another possible reason for non-responding to CRT is a non-optimal LV pacing site.

The CRUSTY PLUS trial is aimed to establish the relevance for the success of CRT of these three factors: lack of fusion, non-optimized A-V conduction, and LV pacing site by comparing the response to CRT with a standard BIV device with fixed out-of-the-box A-V delay with that to a BIV device (Sync A-V plus) endowed with an algorithm which is continuously measuring the patients' A-V conduction and is able to adjust the stimulation parameters according to the measured PR interval, achieving a more dynamic A-V interval and allowing a perfect fusion of ventricular contraction. The algorithm is also able to optimize LV intraventricular synchrony. Sync A-V plus is endowed with a quadripolar multipoint pacing (MPP) CRT-D system allowing pacing of the LV with 2 vectors. This methodology allows a simultaneous earlier and wider excitation of ventricular tissue resulting in better synchronization and better cardiac output.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Heart Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized study with 2 groups: control group (Traditional biventricular stimulation), study group (biventricular stimulation + SyncAV feature)
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

SyncAV plus group

Patients implanted with a CRT-D programmed with SyncAV plus function ON.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SyncAV function on

Intervention Type DEVICE

CRT-D with SyncAV plus activated

Biv Trad

Patients implanted with a CRT-D programmed with fixed AV delay.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

SyncAV function on

CRT-D with SyncAV plus activated

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* More than 18 years of age;
* Have signed the Informed Consent form.
* have been implanted with an Abbott CRT-D with the Sync-AV dynamic function under the current Class I or Class IIa ESC indications (2021 guidelines) for CRT implantation (including upgrades from single or dual chamber pacemakers or ICDs);
* Have to be in sinus rhythm at the Baseline visit and with Left Branch Block (LBBB) (2021 ESC/REVERSE):
* LVEF needs to be \<35% while under optimal medical treatment
* to be willing to meet all study requirements and have the ability to do participate to this study.


* More than 18 years of age;
* Have signed the Informed Consent form.
* And have been implanted with an Abbott CRT-D with the Sync-AV dynamic function under the current Class I or Class IIa ESC indications (2021 guidelines) for CRT implantation (including upgrades from single or dual chamber pacemakers or ICDs);
* Have to be in sinus rhythm at the Baseline visit and with Left Branch Block (LBBB) (2021 ESC/REVERSE):
* LVEF needs to be \<35% while under optimal medical treatment
* In addition, patients need to be willing to meet all study requirements and have the ability to do participate to this study.

Exclusion Criteria

* Having suffered a myocardial infarction or unstable angina in the 40 days prior to inclusion.
* Having undergone coronary revascularization (PTCA, Stent or CABG) in the 4 weeks prior to inclusion.
* Having suffered a Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA) or a Transient Ischemic Accident (TIA) in the 3 months prior to inclusion.
* NYHA Class IV.
* Having received a heart transplant or being waiting to receive it (status I classification);
* Suffering from primary valve disease requiring surgical intervention.
* Having long-lasting or permanent atrial fibrillation
* Showing inadequate transthoracic echocardiographic images which will not allow to establish cardiac output and LV volumes.
* Having a life expectancy \<12months.
* Being pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the clinical investigation.
* Inability to meet the monitoring schedule.
* Currently participating in any other clinical interventional research.
* Having a permanent high degree AV block
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Antonio Rapacciuolo

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Antonio Rapacciuolo

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jaume Francisco Pascual, Dr

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Hospital Vall d'Hebron

Nuria Rivas Gandara, Dr

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Hospital Vall d'Hebron

Angelo Auricchio, Prof

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Istituto Cardiocentro Ticino

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Antonio Rapacciuolo, Prof

Role: CONTACT

0817462235

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

DE-66-22

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.