Right Ventricular (RV) Pacing in Early Post-operative Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD)

NCT ID: NCT01446796

Last Updated: 2015-03-10

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

3 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-09-30

Study Completion Date

2012-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Continuous right ventricular (RV) pacing demonstrates harm in patients with normal left ventricular (LV) function as well as in patients with cardiomyopathy and clinical heart failure. However, little is known about RV pacing in patients with advanced heart failure treated with an implantable left ventricular assist device (LVAD). The univentricular support provided by contemporary continuous flow LVAD's has improved outcomes for many advanced heart failure patients, yet the incidence of RV failure in the early post-operative period following implantation is associated with significantly reduced survival and increased length of stay. Acute LVAD unloading of the left ventricle has adverse effects on RV shape and size that contribute to post-operative RV failure. By promoting RV synchrony, RV overdrive pacing may counteract these adverse mechanical alterations, improving RV systolic function and ultimately LVAD function.

The investigators will recruit all patients referred for an implantable, continuous flow LVAD at Duke University Medical Center who have an existing implantable dual-chamber cardioverter-defibrillator. Patients will be prospectively randomized into two cohorts to compare continuous right ventricular pacing vs. native ventricular conduction at equivalent heart rates. Multiple clinical outcomes will be examined over a two week period post-operatively including invasive hemodynamics, vasoactive medication use, end-organ function, RV function by Echocardiography as well as patient symptoms and functional status.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Heart Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Native Conduction

Devices will be programmed to continuous atrial pacing at an AAI (atrial inhibited pacing) setting with base rate 90 bpm. Patients will not receive ventricular pacing.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (subject's pre-existing ICD)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Pacing parameters set to AAI 90

Continuous RV Pacing

Devices will be programmed to continuous dual chamber pacing at a DDD (dual chamber dual pacing) setting with base rate ≥ 90 bpm (not to exceed 100 bpm) to achieve a majority (\>80%) of paced right ventricular beats

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (subject's pre-existing ICD)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Pacing parameters set to DDD 90-100

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (subject's pre-existing ICD)

Pacing parameters set to AAI 90

Intervention Type DEVICE

Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (subject's pre-existing ICD)

Pacing parameters set to DDD 90-100

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years old, both men and women
* Existing implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD)
* Referred for implantation of a continuous flow LVAD

Exclusion Criteria

* Permanent left ventricular epicardial defibrillator in place
* Congenital heart disease with single ventricle physiology
* Right ventricular assist device (RVAD) in place
* Existing pacing indication
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medtronic

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Duke University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Joseph Rogers, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Duke University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Duke University Medical Center

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Pro00026676

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Optimized Biventricular Pacing Allograft Recipients
NCT01290822 TERMINATED PHASE1/PHASE2