3D Assessment of RV Function in Patients Undergoing LVAD Implantation
NCT ID: NCT05376254
Last Updated: 2025-05-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
200 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-03-22
2027-01-19
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Impact of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy on Right Ventricular Function in Left Ventricular Assist Device Patients
NCT02169076
Observational Hemodynamic Monitoring During LVAD Implantation Among Individuals With Advanced Heart Failure
NCT03464981
Effect of Targeting Left Ventricular Lead Position on the Rate of Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.
NCT00399594
Adaptive Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients With RBBB
NCT05936294
InterventiOn of Biventricular Pacemaker Function on ventrIcular Function Among Patients With LVAD's
NCT03232736
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) improve quality of life and survival in patients with end stage heart failure. However, right ventricular (RV) failure is common in 20-50% of LVAD recipients and is associated with perioperative complications.
Traditional two-dimensional ultrasound views of the right ventricle may not accurately depict how well or poorly the right ventricle is working. Three-dimensional (3D) images can overcome the limitations of two-dimensional images and are becoming more commonplace. This goal of this study is to analyze images of the right ventricle taken via 3D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) during the LVAD implantation to help predict which patients are at higher risk of right ventricular failure within 14 days of the procedure.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. HeartMate III (Thoratec, Pleasanton, CA)
2. HeartWare HVAD (HeartWare, Oakville CA)
3. Levitronix CentriMag (Levitronix LLC, Waltham, MA) LVAD.
Exclusion Criteria
1. hemodynamic data needed to calculate PAPi or comprehensive echocardiographic images are missing
2. additional procedures affecting cardiac geometry and/or hemodynamic measurements, such as tricuspid, mitral, and/or aortic valve repair/replacement, were performed at the time of LVAD implantation
3. sternal closure at the end of the procedure is not possible
4. RV mechanical support was introduced concurrently with LVAD implantation
5. inadequate image quality required to obtain a 3D protocol
6. known contraindication to TEE
7. unexpected inability to advance probe into the mid-esophagus
16 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Alberta
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Surita Sidhu, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Alberta
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Towheed A, Sabbagh E, Gupta R, Assiri S, Chowdhury MA, Moukarbel GV, Khuder SA, Schwann TA, Bonnell MR, Cooper CJ, Khouri S. Right Ventricular Dysfunction and Short-Term Outcomes Following Left-Sided Valvular Surgery: An Echocardiographic Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Feb 16;10(4):e016283. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.016283. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
Amzulescu MS, De Craene M, Langet H, Pasquet A, Vancraeynest D, Pouleur AC, Vanoverschelde JL, Gerber BL. Myocardial strain imaging: review of general principles, validation, and sources of discrepancies. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Jun 1;20(6):605-619. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jez041.
Friedberg MK, Redington AN. Right versus left ventricular failure: differences, similarities, and interactions. Circulation. 2014 Mar 4;129(9):1033-44. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.001375. No abstract available.
Amsallem M, Mercier O, Kobayashi Y, Moneghetti K, Haddad F. Forgotten No More: A Focused Update on the Right Ventricle in Cardiovascular Disease. JACC Heart Fail. 2018 Nov;6(11):891-903. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2018.05.022. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
Konstam MA, Kiernan MS, Bernstein D, Bozkurt B, Jacob M, Kapur NK, Kociol RD, Lewis EF, Mehra MR, Pagani FD, Raval AN, Ward C; American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young; and Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia. Evaluation and Management of Right-Sided Heart Failure: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2018 May 15;137(20):e578-e622. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000560. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
Costanzo MR, Dipchand A, Starling R, Anderson A, Chan M, Desai S, Fedson S, Fisher P, Gonzales-Stawinski G, Martinelli L, McGiffin D, Smith J, Taylor D, Meiser B, Webber S, Baran D, Carboni M, Dengler T, Feldman D, Frigerio M, Kfoury A, Kim D, Kobashigawa J, Shullo M, Stehlik J, Teuteberg J, Uber P, Zuckermann A, Hunt S, Burch M, Bhat G, Canter C, Chinnock R, Crespo-Leiro M, Delgado R, Dobbels F, Grady K, Kao W, Lamour J, Parry G, Patel J, Pini D, Towbin J, Wolfel G, Delgado D, Eisen H, Goldberg L, Hosenpud J, Johnson M, Keogh A, Lewis C, O'Connell J, Rogers J, Ross H, Russell S, Vanhaecke J; International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines. The International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the care of heart transplant recipients. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2010 Aug;29(8):914-56. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2010.05.034. No abstract available.
Magunia H, Dietrich C, Langer HF, Schibilsky D, Schlensak C, Rosenberger P, Nowak-Machen M. 3D echocardiography derived right ventricular function is associated with right ventricular failure and mid-term survival after left ventricular assist device implantation. Int J Cardiol. 2018 Dec 1;272:348-355. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.06.026. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
Haddad F, Doyle R, Murphy DJ, Hunt SA. Right ventricular function in cardiovascular disease, part II: pathophysiology, clinical importance, and management of right ventricular failure. Circulation. 2008 Apr 1;117(13):1717-31. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.653584. No abstract available.
Lella LK, Sales VL, Goldsmith Y, Chan J, Iskandir M, Gulkarov I, Tortolani A, Brener SJ, Sacchi TJ, Heitner JF. Reduced Right Ventricular Function Predicts Long-Term Cardiac Re-Hospitalization after Cardiac Surgery. PLoS One. 2015 Jul 21;10(7):e0132808. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132808. eCollection 2015.
Nagata Y, Wu VC, Kado Y, Otani K, Lin FC, Otsuji Y, Negishi K, Takeuchi M. Prognostic Value of Right Ventricular Ejection Fraction Assessed by Transthoracic 3D Echocardiography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Feb;10(2):e005384. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.005384.
Rudski LG, Lai WW, Afilalo J, Hua L, Handschumacher MD, Chandrasekaran K, Solomon SD, Louie EK, Schiller NB. Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography endorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010 Jul;23(7):685-713; quiz 786-8. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2010.05.010. No abstract available.
Schneider M, Binder T. Echocardiographic evaluation of the right heart. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2018 Jul;130(13-14):413-420. doi: 10.1007/s00508-018-1330-3. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
Mogelvang J, Stubgaard M, Thomsen C, Henriksen O. Evaluation of right ventricular volumes measured by magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J. 1988 May;9(5):529-33. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a062539.
Dragulescu A, Grosse-Wortmann L, Fackoury C, Mertens L. Echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular volumes: a comparison of different techniques in children after surgical repair of tetralogy of Fallot. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Jul;13(7):596-604. doi: 10.1093/ejechocard/jer278. Epub 2011 Dec 22.
Niemann PS, Pinho L, Balbach T, Galuschky C, Blankenhagen M, Silberbach M, Broberg C, Jerosch-Herold M, Sahn DJ. Anatomically oriented right ventricular volume measurements with dynamic three-dimensional echocardiography validated by 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Oct 23;50(17):1668-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.07.031.
Otani K, Nabeshima Y, Kitano T, Takeuchi M. Accuracy of fully automated right ventricular quantification software with 3D echocardiography: direct comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance and semi-automated quantification software. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Jul 1;21(7):787-795. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jez236.
Shimada YJ, Shiota M, Siegel RJ, Shiota T. Accuracy of right ventricular volumes and function determined by three-dimensional echocardiography in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010 Sep;23(9):943-53. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2010.06.029.
Lu MJ, Zhong WH, Liu YX, Miao HZ, Li YC, Ji MH. Sample Size for Assessing Agreement between Two Methods of Measurement by Bland-Altman Method. Int J Biostat. 2016 Nov 1;12(2):/j/ijb.2016.12.issue-2/ijb-2015-0039/ijb-2015-0039.xml. doi: 10.1515/ijb-2015-0039.
Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10.
Kim J, Cohen SB, Atalay MK, Maslow AD, Poppas A. Quantitative Assessment of Right Ventricular Volumes and Ejection Fraction in Patients with Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction by Real Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiography versus Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Echocardiography. 2015 May;32(5):805-12. doi: 10.1111/echo.12715. Epub 2014 Aug 11.
Leibundgut G, Rohner A, Grize L, Bernheim A, Kessel-Schaefer A, Bremerich J, Zellweger M, Buser P, Handke M. Dynamic assessment of right ventricular volumes and function by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: a comparison study with magnetic resonance imaging in 100 adult patients. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010 Feb;23(2):116-26. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2009.11.016.
van der Zwaan HB, Helbing WA, McGhie JS, Geleijnse ML, Luijnenburg SE, Roos-Hesselink JW, Meijboom FJ. Clinical value of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography for right ventricular quantification in congenital heart disease: validation with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010 Feb;23(2):134-40. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2009.12.001.
Medvedofsky D, Addetia K, Patel AR, Sedlmeier A, Baumann R, Mor-Avi V, Lang RM. Novel Approach to Three-Dimensional Echocardiographic Quantification of Right Ventricular Volumes and Function from Focused Views. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015 Oct;28(10):1222-31. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2015.06.013. Epub 2015 Aug 1.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro00112239
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.