Progressive Ventricular Dysfunction Prevention in Pacemaker Patients

NCT ID: NCT00170326

Last Updated: 2025-07-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

108 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2002-01-31

Study Completion Date

2009-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this pilot study is to evaluate the progression of ventricular dysfunction in patients with ventricular dysfunction within the permanent pacing population.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The interventricular synchrony is one of the components of a proper cardiac function. When there is no synchrony -as in left bundle block (LBBB)- the clinic consequences should have little importance in patients with a healthy heart or a great importance in patients suffering heart failure (HF), specially in those with severe grade of HF, the benefit of cardiac resynchronization by pacing both ventricles or left ventricle (LV)should means healthy improvement in patients. All previous studies done in HF, are in patients with symptomatic HF. The importance of stop progression of latent HF in patients with asymptomatic ventricular dysfunction (VD)in permanent pacing indication patients. Pacing may accelerate HF progression by dissincronyzing ventricles. ACE inhibitors studies in asymptomatic VD gave positive results.

The PreVent-HF is an international, multicenter, prospective, randomized, single-blinded pilot trial specifically designed to evaluate as main objective the progression of VD in permanent pacing population.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiac Pacing Indication classI/IIa According AHA/ACC

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Video tapes are provided by the central study organization and are labelled by numbers. The tapes are sent to the echocardiography core laboratory (Malaga, Spain) and are read by the Director of the Echo Core Lab (J.J. Gomez-Doblas). The echo examiner is blinded as to the point of time of the recording and assignment of treatment, although the presence of a LV lead may be adumbrated by visible artefacts.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Dual Chamber pacing

conventional dual-chamber pacemaker/ICD implantation with the ventricular lead in the right ventricular apex

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

dual-chamber pacemaker implantation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Dual Chamber pacing via conventional DDD(R) right ventricular pacemaker or in case of ICD indication a standard dualchamber ICD device.

Biventricular pacing

Biventricular pacing: dual-chamber biventricular pacemaker/ICD implantation with leads at the right ventricular apex and the left ventricle

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

biventricular dual-chamber pacemaker implant

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Biventricular pacemaker system or in case in ICD indication a BIV ICD

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

dual-chamber pacemaker implantation

Dual Chamber pacing via conventional DDD(R) right ventricular pacemaker or in case of ICD indication a standard dualchamber ICD device.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

biventricular dual-chamber pacemaker implant

Biventricular pacemaker system or in case in ICD indication a BIV ICD

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

DDD pacing, RV InSync 8040, InSync III 8042

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Meet Class I and/or Class IIa implantation criteria for permanent cardiac pacing according to the guidelines given by the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association(AHA).

Exclusion Criteria

* Expected ventricle stimulation \<80% of the time
* Impossibility of dual chamber stimulation in the absence of AF
* Severe heart failure (NYHA Functional class III-IV) previous to indication for pacing device implant
* Patient needs revascularization within 3 months
* Myocardial infarction in the last 3 months
* Cardiac surgery performed in the last 3 months
* Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
* Constrictive pericarditis
* Bad echo window
* Previous system implanted (ICD or pacemaker)
* Aortic stenosis
* Patient has a mechanical right heart valve
* Patient \<18 years
* Pregnancy
* Patient has medical conditions that would preclude the testing required by the protocol, or limit study participation
* Life expectancy \<1year
* Patient is unwilling or unable to cooperate or give written informed consent.
* Patient is or will be inaccessible for follow-up at the study center.
* Patients who are participating or planning to participate in other clinical trials during the clinical study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Eduardo De Teresa, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain

Javier Alzueta, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Clinico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain

Ignacio Fernández Lozano, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain

Juan José Gómez Doblas, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain

Francisco Navarro López, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Clinic i Provincial, Barcelona, Spain

A. Curnis, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ospedale Civile Brescia, Italy

Xavier Navarro Michel, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Medtronic Ibérica, S.A., Barcelona, Spain

M. Stockburger, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Charite, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany

Gervasio Lamas, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mount Sinai Clinical Center, Miami, FL, USA

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital General de Alicante

Alicante, , Spain

Site Status

H. Infanta Cristina

Badajoz, , Spain

Site Status

H. Clínic i Provincial

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

H. Puerta de Hierro

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

H. C. U. Virgen de la Victoria

Málaga, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

de Teresa E, Gomez-Doblas JJ, Lamas G, Alzueta J, Fernandez-Lozano I, Cobo E, Navarro X, Navarro-Lopez F, Stockburger M. Preventing ventricular dysfunction in pacemaker patients without advanced heart failure: rationale and design of the PREVENT-HF study. Europace. 2007 Jun;9(6):442-6. doi: 10.1093/europace/eum064. Epub 2007 Apr 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17460018 (View on PubMed)

Stockburger M, Gomez-Doblas JJ, Lamas G, Alzueta J, Fernandez-Lozano I, Cobo E, Wiegand U, Concha JF, Navarro X, Navarro-Lopez F, de Teresa E. Preventing ventricular dysfunction in pacemaker patients without advanced heart failure: results from a multicentre international randomized trial (PREVENT-HF). Eur J Heart Fail. 2011 Jun;13(6):633-41. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfr041.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21613427 (View on PubMed)

Stockburger M, de Teresa E, Lamas G, Desaga M, Koenig C, Habedank D, Cobo E, Navarro X, Wiegand U. Exercise capacity and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels with biventricular vs. right ventricular pacing for atrioventricular block: results from the PREVENT-HF German Substudy. Europace. 2014 Jan;16(1):63-70. doi: 10.1093/europace/eut217. Epub 2013 Jul 16.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23861381 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PreVent-HF

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Minimizing Ventricular Pacing
NCT01611389 UNKNOWN NA