AV Delay Optimization vs. Intrinsic Conduction in Pacemaker Patients With Long PR Intervals

NCT ID: NCT02154750

Last Updated: 2025-07-24

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

23 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-06-01

Study Completion Date

2021-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a randomized, prospective clinical trial to determine the effects of two different pacemaker atrioventricular delay (AV delay) settings on heart function in patients with dual chamber pacemakers implanted for symptomatic bradycardia with long PR intervals (delayed conduction between upper and lower chambers of the heart). The study will compare a long, fixed AV delay (standard) with an optimized AV delay for each individual using echocardiography (experimental).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Cardiac pacing is the only effective treatment for symptomatic sinus node dysfunction. Most patients with preserved left ventricular function receive dual chamber pacemakers; however, right ventricular pacing can have detrimental effects on left ventricular function due to the abnormal electrical and mechanical activation pattern of the ventricles.

Many patients receiving dual chamber pacemakers for symptomatic bradycardia have prolonged intrinsic AV conduction (first degree AV block), and as a result, will receive a significant amount of ventricular pacing if programmed at physiologic AV intervals. As an alternative, many pacemakers can be programmed to minimize ventricular pacing at the expense of allowing longer AV delays. However, these long AV delays may not be physiologic and may also lead to reduced cardiac output. At present the standard of care is either to program the pacemaker at an physiologic "natural" AV delay of about 160 msec or to program the pacemaker with a long AV delay to minimize ventricular pacing.

The main scientific questions being addressed in this study are to evaluate the acute and chronic effects on cardiac output, functional status, sense of well-being, and cardiac remodeling of a long AV delay allowing for intrinsic conduction as compared to an echocardiographically optimized AV delay during dual chamber pacing.

Patients enrolled in the trial will complete a run-in period of two weeks prior to randomization in which pacemakers will be programmed with a long-fixed AV delay to allow intrinsic conduction and minimize ventricular pacing (standard). At two weeks, patients will receive a baseline echocardiogram. To determine optimal AV delay, all patients will undergo echocardiographic analysis at varying AV delays. Optimal AV delay will be defined as the AV delay associated with the largest average aortic Doppler velocity time integral (VTI). Then, patients will be randomized to either the short, optimized (experimental) or long, fixed (standard) AV delay groups. To assess functional status and sense of well-being, patients will complete a six minute walk test and Short Form-36 Medical Outcomes Study Questionnaire. Patients return to clinic for another study visit at 6 months and repeat research procedures, including baseline echocardiogram, questionnaire, and 6 minute walk test.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Atrioventricular Block Sick Sinus Syndrome Symptomatic Bradycardia Cardiac Arrhythmia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Long, fixed AV delay

Pacemaker will be set to a long, fixed AV delay to minimize ventricular pacing

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Long, fixed AV delay

Intervention Type DEVICE

Pacemaker will be set to a long, fixed AV delay to minimize ventricular pacing

Short, optimized AV delay

Pacemaker will be set to the AV delay that produces the greatest cardiac output in echocardiography for each patient enrolled

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Short, optimized AV delay

Intervention Type DEVICE

Pacemaker will be set to the AV delay that produces the greatest cardiac output in echocardiography for each patient enrolled.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Long, fixed AV delay

Pacemaker will be set to a long, fixed AV delay to minimize ventricular pacing

Intervention Type DEVICE

Short, optimized AV delay

Pacemaker will be set to the AV delay that produces the greatest cardiac output in echocardiography for each patient enrolled.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients greater than 18 years of age
2. Patients with symptomatic sinus bradycardia
3. Patients who meet standard indications for dual chamber pacemaker implantation
4. Patients who have 1st degree AV block determined by PR interval \> 200ms

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with complete or high grade AV block
2. Patients who are unable to complete dual chamber pacemaker implantation for any reason
3. Patients with congestive heart failure determined by a Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction \< 45%
4. Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation
5. Sustained premature ventricular contractions (PVCs), premature atrial contractions (PACs), atrial flutter, or other heart conditions that may interfere with echocardiography measurements
6. Patients who are pregnant
7. Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation that have had an episode(s) within 30 days of consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of California, San Diego

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Greg Feld

Professor of Medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gregory K Feld, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

UCSD Electrophysiology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UCSD Sulpizio Cardiovascular Center

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sawhney NS, Waggoner AD, Garhwal S, Chawla MK, Osborn J, Faddis MN. Randomized prospective trial of atrioventricular delay programming for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm. 2004 Nov;1(5):562-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2004.07.006.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15851220 (View on PubMed)

Tops LF, Schalij MJ, Bax JJ. The effects of right ventricular apical pacing on ventricular function and dyssynchrony implications for therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Aug 25;54(9):764-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.006.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19695453 (View on PubMed)

Iliev II, Yamachika S, Muta K, Hayano M, Ishimatsu T, Nakao K, Komiya N, Hirata T, Ueyama C, Yano K. Preserving normal ventricular activation versus atrioventricular delay optimization during pacing: the role of intrinsic atrioventricular conduction and pacing rate. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000 Jan;23(1):74-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb00652.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10666756 (View on PubMed)

Sweeney MO, Ellenbogen KA, Tang AS, Whellan D, Mortensen PT, Giraldi F, Sandler DA, Sherfesee L, Sheldon T; Managed Ventricular Pacing Versus VVI 40 Pacing Trial Investigators. Atrial pacing or ventricular backup-only pacing in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients. Heart Rhythm. 2010 Nov;7(11):1552-60. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.05.038. Epub 2010 Jun 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20685401 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

130663

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.