AV Delay Optimization vs. Intrinsic Conduction in Pacemaker Patients With Long PR Intervals
NCT ID: NCT02154750
Last Updated: 2025-07-24
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
23 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-06-01
2021-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pacemaker Utilization and Ventricular Pacing in Patients Undergoing Trans-catheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR)
NCT02994667
Minimizing Ventricular Pacing
NCT01611389
Right Ventricular Resynchronization Therapy
NCT01163422
Physiologic Pacing for Symptomatic First-Degree Heart Block
NCT06245304
Optimal Pacing Rate for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
NCT06445439
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Many patients receiving dual chamber pacemakers for symptomatic bradycardia have prolonged intrinsic AV conduction (first degree AV block), and as a result, will receive a significant amount of ventricular pacing if programmed at physiologic AV intervals. As an alternative, many pacemakers can be programmed to minimize ventricular pacing at the expense of allowing longer AV delays. However, these long AV delays may not be physiologic and may also lead to reduced cardiac output. At present the standard of care is either to program the pacemaker at an physiologic "natural" AV delay of about 160 msec or to program the pacemaker with a long AV delay to minimize ventricular pacing.
The main scientific questions being addressed in this study are to evaluate the acute and chronic effects on cardiac output, functional status, sense of well-being, and cardiac remodeling of a long AV delay allowing for intrinsic conduction as compared to an echocardiographically optimized AV delay during dual chamber pacing.
Patients enrolled in the trial will complete a run-in period of two weeks prior to randomization in which pacemakers will be programmed with a long-fixed AV delay to allow intrinsic conduction and minimize ventricular pacing (standard). At two weeks, patients will receive a baseline echocardiogram. To determine optimal AV delay, all patients will undergo echocardiographic analysis at varying AV delays. Optimal AV delay will be defined as the AV delay associated with the largest average aortic Doppler velocity time integral (VTI). Then, patients will be randomized to either the short, optimized (experimental) or long, fixed (standard) AV delay groups. To assess functional status and sense of well-being, patients will complete a six minute walk test and Short Form-36 Medical Outcomes Study Questionnaire. Patients return to clinic for another study visit at 6 months and repeat research procedures, including baseline echocardiogram, questionnaire, and 6 minute walk test.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Long, fixed AV delay
Pacemaker will be set to a long, fixed AV delay to minimize ventricular pacing
Long, fixed AV delay
Pacemaker will be set to a long, fixed AV delay to minimize ventricular pacing
Short, optimized AV delay
Pacemaker will be set to the AV delay that produces the greatest cardiac output in echocardiography for each patient enrolled
Short, optimized AV delay
Pacemaker will be set to the AV delay that produces the greatest cardiac output in echocardiography for each patient enrolled.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Long, fixed AV delay
Pacemaker will be set to a long, fixed AV delay to minimize ventricular pacing
Short, optimized AV delay
Pacemaker will be set to the AV delay that produces the greatest cardiac output in echocardiography for each patient enrolled.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients with symptomatic sinus bradycardia
3. Patients who meet standard indications for dual chamber pacemaker implantation
4. Patients who have 1st degree AV block determined by PR interval \> 200ms
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patients who are unable to complete dual chamber pacemaker implantation for any reason
3. Patients with congestive heart failure determined by a Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction \< 45%
4. Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation
5. Sustained premature ventricular contractions (PVCs), premature atrial contractions (PACs), atrial flutter, or other heart conditions that may interfere with echocardiography measurements
6. Patients who are pregnant
7. Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation that have had an episode(s) within 30 days of consent
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of California, San Diego
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Greg Feld
Professor of Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gregory K Feld, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UCSD Electrophysiology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UCSD Sulpizio Cardiovascular Center
La Jolla, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sawhney NS, Waggoner AD, Garhwal S, Chawla MK, Osborn J, Faddis MN. Randomized prospective trial of atrioventricular delay programming for cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm. 2004 Nov;1(5):562-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2004.07.006.
Tops LF, Schalij MJ, Bax JJ. The effects of right ventricular apical pacing on ventricular function and dyssynchrony implications for therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Aug 25;54(9):764-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.006.
Iliev II, Yamachika S, Muta K, Hayano M, Ishimatsu T, Nakao K, Komiya N, Hirata T, Ueyama C, Yano K. Preserving normal ventricular activation versus atrioventricular delay optimization during pacing: the role of intrinsic atrioventricular conduction and pacing rate. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000 Jan;23(1):74-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb00652.x.
Sweeney MO, Ellenbogen KA, Tang AS, Whellan D, Mortensen PT, Giraldi F, Sandler DA, Sherfesee L, Sheldon T; Managed Ventricular Pacing Versus VVI 40 Pacing Trial Investigators. Atrial pacing or ventricular backup-only pacing in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator patients. Heart Rhythm. 2010 Nov;7(11):1552-60. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.05.038. Epub 2010 Jun 4.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
130663
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.