Identification of the Pericardiophrenic Vein During Cardiac Device Implant Procedures to Prevent Extracardiac Stimulation
NCT ID: NCT01008670
Last Updated: 2010-11-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
120 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2007-12-31
2010-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The risk of phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) exists during CRT implantation and is only minimally dependent of the type of coronary lead and highly dependent upon location of the left coronary vein lead in relationship to the left phrenic nerve and stimulation strength. Tedrow et al. demonstrated in a cohort of 71 patients PNS can reach 16% if stimulation strength is increased to maximize mechanical benefit of CRT. No current methods have been able to predict PNS, the one likely method of preventing PNS is to identify the location of the phrenic nerve in the specific patient, as confirmed by visualization and ability to stimulate the phrenic nerve and by maximizing the distance between the coronary vein lead position and nerve.
In order to reduce the incidence of phrenic nerve stimulation, Vaseghi performed non-selective injections of contrast media and was able to identify the left pericardiophrenic vein in only about 12% of patients undergoing biventricular pacemaker placement. However, in these patients, identification of the left pericardiophrenic vein provides a landmark for positioning of the left ventricular (LV) lead that totally eliminated the incidence of phrenic nerve pacing.
The relationship of cardiac structures to the right and left phrenic nerves is generally known but is significantly variable between patients. There is no imaging or other clinically available modality that allows the physician to identify the location of the left phrenic nerve and attempt to avoid it during the left coronary vein lead implant procedure.
The pericardiophrenic veins are a deep collateral venous drainage of the pericardium, pleura and diaphragm and lie adjacent the phrenic nerves on both the right and left sides between the parietal pericardium and adjacent pleura. The ostium of the left pericardiophrenic vein is usually in the left brachiocephalic vein opposite the entrance of the left jugular vein. The left phrenic vein is located in the general vicinity of the thymic veins which often have multiple ostia in close proximity. There are several case reports in the literature of inadvertent cannulation of the pericardiophrenic veins with Swan-Ganz catheters, central venous catheters and one report of cannulation with a pacing lead leading to inadvertent phrenic nerve pacing.
The primary goal of this study is to develop techniques to identify the course of the phrenic nerve in patients already undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation or candidates for future CRT devices undergoing implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or pacemaker implantation. Specifically, the study intends to identify the location and course of the left pericardiophrenic vein, and thus the left phrenic nerve, to guide the location for coronary vein lead placement and minimize the risk of phrenic nerve stimulation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Device Implant Recipients
Patients undergoing CRT implantation, or candidates for future CRT devices currently undergoing ICD or pacemaker implantation.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Undergoing implantation of a CRT, ICD, or pacemaker device
Exclusion Criteria
* Nursing mothers and women who are pregnant
* Patients for whom informed consent cannot be obtained.
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Respicardia, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Cardiac Concepts, Inc.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Alabama
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Ohio Heart Hospital
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
The Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Baptist Memorial Hospital
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Sentara Norfolk General
Norfolk, Virginia, United States
Ruhr University of Bochum
Bad Oeynhausen, , Germany
University of Mannheim
Mannheim, , Germany
Prince of Wales Hospital
Shatin, New Territories, , Hong Kong
Policlinico di Monza
Monza, , Italy
Jagiellonian University
Krakow, , Poland
Medical Military Institute
Warsaw, , Poland
Wroclaw Fourth Military Hospital
Wroclaw, , Poland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CCI-Venography
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id