Identification of the Pericardiophrenic Vein During Cardiac Device Implant Procedures to Prevent Extracardiac Stimulation

NCT ID: NCT01008670

Last Updated: 2010-11-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-12-31

Study Completion Date

2010-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary goal of this study is to develop techniques to identify the course of the phrenic nerve in patients already undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation or candidates for future CRT devices undergoing implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or pacemaker implantation. Specifically, the study intends to identify the location and course of the left pericardiophrenic vein, and thus the left phrenic nerve, to guide the location for coronary vein lead placement and minimize the risk of phrenic nerve stimulation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Phrenic nerve stimulation from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a common adverse event occurring in 1.5-3% of patients and sometimes as high as 10%. Phrenic nerve stimulation is frequently observed during the implantation procedure but often appears shortly after implantation as well. Clinically, dyspnea, cough, and hiccups can occur, some of which are uncomfortable and not tolerated by the patient for very long periods of time. Resolution of these clinical outcomes requires repositioning the left coronary vein lead in a second procedure with its attendant serious clinical sequelae. As CRT leads become smaller the incidence of phrenic nerve stimulation is likely to increase.

The risk of phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) exists during CRT implantation and is only minimally dependent of the type of coronary lead and highly dependent upon location of the left coronary vein lead in relationship to the left phrenic nerve and stimulation strength. Tedrow et al. demonstrated in a cohort of 71 patients PNS can reach 16% if stimulation strength is increased to maximize mechanical benefit of CRT. No current methods have been able to predict PNS, the one likely method of preventing PNS is to identify the location of the phrenic nerve in the specific patient, as confirmed by visualization and ability to stimulate the phrenic nerve and by maximizing the distance between the coronary vein lead position and nerve.

In order to reduce the incidence of phrenic nerve stimulation, Vaseghi performed non-selective injections of contrast media and was able to identify the left pericardiophrenic vein in only about 12% of patients undergoing biventricular pacemaker placement. However, in these patients, identification of the left pericardiophrenic vein provides a landmark for positioning of the left ventricular (LV) lead that totally eliminated the incidence of phrenic nerve pacing.

The relationship of cardiac structures to the right and left phrenic nerves is generally known but is significantly variable between patients. There is no imaging or other clinically available modality that allows the physician to identify the location of the left phrenic nerve and attempt to avoid it during the left coronary vein lead implant procedure.

The pericardiophrenic veins are a deep collateral venous drainage of the pericardium, pleura and diaphragm and lie adjacent the phrenic nerves on both the right and left sides between the parietal pericardium and adjacent pleura. The ostium of the left pericardiophrenic vein is usually in the left brachiocephalic vein opposite the entrance of the left jugular vein. The left phrenic vein is located in the general vicinity of the thymic veins which often have multiple ostia in close proximity. There are several case reports in the literature of inadvertent cannulation of the pericardiophrenic veins with Swan-Ganz catheters, central venous catheters and one report of cannulation with a pacing lead leading to inadvertent phrenic nerve pacing.

The primary goal of this study is to develop techniques to identify the course of the phrenic nerve in patients already undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implantation or candidates for future CRT devices undergoing implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or pacemaker implantation. Specifically, the study intends to identify the location and course of the left pericardiophrenic vein, and thus the left phrenic nerve, to guide the location for coronary vein lead placement and minimize the risk of phrenic nerve stimulation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Heart Failure

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Device Implant Recipients

Patients undergoing CRT implantation, or candidates for future CRT devices currently undergoing ICD or pacemaker implantation.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male or female between the ages of 18 and 85 years old.
* Undergoing implantation of a CRT, ICD, or pacemaker device

Exclusion Criteria

* Allergy to contrast dye
* Nursing mothers and women who are pregnant
* Patients for whom informed consent cannot be obtained.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Respicardia, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Cardiac Concepts, Inc.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Alabama

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Johns Hopkins University

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Ohio Heart Hospital

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

The Ohio State University

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Baptist Memorial Hospital

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Sentara Norfolk General

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Ruhr University of Bochum

Bad Oeynhausen, , Germany

Site Status

University of Mannheim

Mannheim, , Germany

Site Status

Prince of Wales Hospital

Shatin, New Territories, , Hong Kong

Site Status

Policlinico di Monza

Monza, , Italy

Site Status

Jagiellonian University

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Medical Military Institute

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Wroclaw Fourth Military Hospital

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Germany Hong Kong Italy Poland

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CCI-Venography

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id