Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
744 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-11-30
2017-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Micra Transcatheter Pacing System Continued Access Study Protocol
NCT02488681
Micra Transcatheter Pacing System Post-Approval Registry
NCT02536118
China Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study
NCT03624504
A Retrospective Trial to Evaluate the Micra Pacemaker
NCT04051814
Accelerometer Sensing for Micra AV Study
NCT04245345
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Up to 780 subjects were planned to be enrolled (i.e. consented) to allow up to 720 subjects to be implanted enabling at least 600 subjects to be followed for at least 12-months post-implant.
There are two primary objectives in this study (one safety and one efficacy). The primary safety objective of the study is to evaluate major complications related to the Micra system or procedure. The primary safety endpoint was pre-specified to be evaluated at 6-months (183 days) post-implant. The primary efficacy objective, Micra pacing capture thresholds, was also pre-specified to be evaluated six months post-implant. This study also has a separate long term safety objective that will provide additional long-term safety data following potential regulatory submissions.
All subjects will be followed until official study closure (official study closure is defined as when Medtronic and/or FDA requirements have been satisfied per the Clinical Investigational Plan and/or by a decision by Medtronic or regulatory authority).
Additionally, the Micra Accelerometer Sensor Sub-Study (MASS) is being conducted at 4 centers already active in the Micra study in Austria, Spain, Hungary and France. Forty (40) subjects were enrolled in the Sub-Study, and enrollment in the Sub-Study was complete as of March 31, 2016. The purpose of the Sub-Study is to test feasibility for future enhancements in the Micra device functionalities.
An algorithm was designed to sense the atrial contraction using the Micra accelerometer.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Micra Pacemaker Implant
Micra Pacemaker Implant
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Micra Pacemaker Implant
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subjects who are able and willing to undergo the study requirements and are expected to be geographically stable for the duration of the follow-up.
* Subjects who are at least 18 years of age (or older, if required by local law).
Exclusion Criteria
* Subject has an existing or prior pacemaker, ICD or CRT device implant.
* Subject has unstable angina pectoris or has had an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the 30 days prior to eligibility assessment.
* Subjects with current implantation of neurostimulator or any other chronically implanted device which uses current in the body. Note that a temporary pacing wire is allowed.
* Subjects with a mechanical tricuspid valve, implanted vena cava filter, or left ventricular assist device (LVAD).
* Subjects who are morbidly obese and physician believes telemetry communication of ≤5 inches (12.7 cm) could not be obtained with programmer head.
* Subjects whose femoral venous anatomy is unable to accommodate a 23 French introducer sheath or implant on the right side of the heart (for example, due to obstructions or severe tortuosity) in the opinion of the implanter.
* Subjects who are considered as unable to tolerate an urgent sternotomy
* Subjects with a known intolerance to Nickel-Titanium (Nitinol) Alloy.
* Subjects for whom a single dose of 1.0mg dexamethasone acetate may be contraindicated.
* Subjects with a life expectancy of less than 12- months.
* Subjects who are currently enrolled or planning to participate in a potentially confounding drug or device trial during the course of this study. Coenrollment in concurrent trials is only allowed when document pre-approval is obtained from the Medtronic study manager.
* Pregnant women, or women of child bearing potential and who are not on a reliable form of birth control.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dwight Reynolds
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
University of Oklahoma
Philippe Ritter
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Hôpital Haut-Lévêque
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Scripps
La Jolla, California, United States
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, United States
Yale University
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Baptist Heart Specialists
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Baptist Hospital of Miami
Miami, Florida, United States
Emory University Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Iowa Heart Center
West Des Moines, Iowa, United States
Michigan Heart
Ypsilanti, Michigan, United States
Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
CentraCare Heart & Vascular Center
Saint Cloud, Minnesota, United States
Mid America Heart Institute
Kansas City, Missouri, United States
Morristown Memorial Hospital
Morristown, New Jersey, United States
The Valley Hospital
Ridgewood, New Jersey, United States
North Shore LIJ Health System
Manhasset, New York, United States
NYU Langone Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
The Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, United States
University of Oklahoma Health Science Center (OUHSC)
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Oklahoma Heart Hospital
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Providence Health & Services
Portland, Oregon, United States
Lancaster Heart & Vascular Research Institute
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center UPMC Presbyterian
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Lankenau Institute for Medical Research
Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, United States
The Stern Cardiovascular Clinic
Germantown, Tennessee, United States
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Baylor Research Institute
Dallas, Texas, United States
St. Luke's Medical Center
Houston, Texas, United States
University of Virginia Medical Center
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
Aurora Cardiovascular Services
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Princess Alexandria Hospital
Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
Allgemeines Krankenhaus der Stadt Linz
Linz, , Austria
Montreal Heart Institute
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec (IUCPQ)
Québec, , Canada
Fuwai Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College
Beijing, , China
Nemocnice Na Homolce
Prague, , Czechia
Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, , Denmark
Hôpital Haut-Lévêque - CHU de Bordeaux
Bordeaux, , France
University General Hospital of Heraklion
Heraklion, , Greece
Magyar Honvédség Honvédkorház
Budapest, , Hungary
CARE Hospitals
Hyderabad, , India
All India Institute of Medical Sciences
New Delhi, , India
Govind Ballabh Pant Hospital
New Delhi, , India
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana - Stabilimento Santa Chiara
Pisa, , Italy
National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
Osaka, , Japan
Showa University Hospital
Shinagawa-Ku, , Japan
Kyorin University Hospital
Tokyo, , Japan
Yokohama City University Hospital
Yokohama, , Japan
Institut Jantung Negara - National Heart Institute
Kuala Lumpur, , Malaysia
Academisch Medisch Centrum (AMC)
Amsterdam, , Netherlands
Catharina Ziekenhuis
Eindhoven, , Netherlands
St. Antonius Ziekenhuis - Locatie Nieuwegein
Nieuwegein, , Netherlands
Klinicki Centar Srbije
Belgrade, , Serbia
Groote Schuur Hospital
Cape Town, , South Africa
Hospital Universitari Clínic de Barcelona
Barcelona, , Spain
Southampton General Hospital - University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust
Southampton, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Piccini JP, Cunnane R, Steffel J, El-Chami MF, Reynolds D, Roberts PR, Soejima K, Steinwender C, Garweg C, Chinitz L, Ellis CR, Stromberg K, Fagan DH, Mont L. Development and validation of a risk score for predicting pericardial effusion in patients undergoing leadless pacemaker implantation: experience with the Micra transcatheter pacemaker. Europace. 2022 Jul 21;24(7):1119-1126. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab315.
El-Chami MF, Shinn T, Bansal S, Martinez-Sande JL, Clementy N, Augostini R, Ravindran B, Sagi V, Ramanna H, Garweg C, Roberts PR, Soejima K, Stromberg K, Fagan DH, Zuniga N, Piccini JP. Leadless pacemaker implant with concomitant atrioventricular node ablation: Experience with the Micra transcatheter pacemaker. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 Mar;32(3):832-841. doi: 10.1111/jce.14881. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
Garg A, Koneru JN, Fagan DH, Stromberg K, Padala SK, El-Chami MF, Roberts PR, Piccini JP, Cheng A, Ellenbogen KA. Morbidity and mortality in patients precluded for transvenous pacemaker implantation: Experience with a leadless pacemaker. Heart Rhythm. 2020 Dec;17(12):2056-2063. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.07.035. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
Tjong FVY, Beurskens NEG, de Groot JR, Waweru C, Liu S, Ritter P, Reynolds D, Wilde AAM, Knops RE; Micra Investigators. Health-related quality of life impact of a transcatheter pacing system. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2018 Dec;29(12):1697-1704. doi: 10.1111/jce.13726. Epub 2018 Oct 15.
El-Chami MF, Al-Samadi F, Clementy N, Garweg C, Martinez-Sande JL, Piccini JP, Iacopino S, Lloyd M, Vinolas Prat X, Jacobsen MD, Ritter P, Johansen JB, Tondo C, Liu F, Fagan DH, Eakley AK, Roberts PR. Updated performance of the Micra transcatheter pacemaker in the real-world setting: A comparison to the investigational study and a transvenous historical control. Heart Rhythm. 2018 Dec;15(12):1800-1807. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.08.005. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
Okabe T, El-Chami MF, Lloyd MS, Buck B, Gornick CC, Moore JC, Augostini RS, Hummel JD. Leadless pacemaker implantation and concurrent atrioventricular junction ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 May;41(5):504-510. doi: 10.1111/pace.13312. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
Soejima K, Asano T, Ishikawa T, Kusano K, Sato T, Okamura H, Matsumoto K, Taguchi W, Stromberg K, Lande J, Kobayashi Y; Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study Group. Performance of Leadless Pacemaker in Japanese Patients vs. Rest of the World - Results From a Global Clinical Trial. Circ J. 2017 Oct 25;81(11):1589-1595. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0259. Epub 2017 May 30.
Lloyd M, Reynolds D, Sheldon T, Stromberg K, Hudnall JH, Demmer WM, Omar R, Ritter P, Hummel J, Mont L, Steinwender C, Duray GZ. Rate adaptive pacing in an intracardiac pacemaker. Heart Rhythm. 2017 Feb;14(2):200-205. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.11.016. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
Reynolds D, Duray GZ, Omar R, Soejima K, Neuzil P, Zhang S, Narasimhan C, Steinwender C, Brugada J, Lloyd M, Roberts PR, Sagi V, Hummel J, Bongiorni MG, Knops RE, Ellis CR, Gornick CC, Bernabei MA, Laager V, Stromberg K, Williams ER, Hudnall JH, Ritter P; Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study Group. A Leadless Intracardiac Transcatheter Pacing System. N Engl J Med. 2016 Feb 11;374(6):533-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511643. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
Ritter P, Duray GZ, Steinwender C, Soejima K, Omar R, Mont L, Boersma LV, Knops RE, Chinitz L, Zhang S, Narasimhan C, Hummel J, Lloyd M, Simmers TA, Voigt A, Laager V, Stromberg K, Bonner MD, Sheldon TJ, Reynolds D; Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study Group. Early performance of a miniaturized leadless cardiac pacemaker: the Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study. Eur Heart J. 2015 Oct 1;36(37):2510-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv214. Epub 2015 Jun 4.
Ritter P, Duray GZ, Zhang S, Narasimhan C, Soejima K, Omar R, Laager V, Stromberg K, Williams E, Reynolds D; Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study Group. The rationale and design of the Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study: safety and efficacy of a novel miniaturized pacemaker. Europace. 2015 May;17(5):807-13. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv026. Epub 2015 Apr 7.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Micra
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.