Effectiveness of the EMPOWER™ Modular Pacing System and EMBLEM™ Subcutaneous ICD to Communicate Antitachycardia Pacing

NCT ID: NCT04798768

Last Updated: 2025-11-10

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

297 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-07-20

Study Completion Date

2030-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The MODULAR ATP Clinical Study is designed to demonstrate safety, performance, and effectiveness of the Modular Cardiac Rhythm Management (mCRM) Therapy System.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The MODULAR ATP Clinical Study will enroll subjects with a standard Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) indication applying international practice guidelines, as well as those who already have an implanted S-ICD System and satisfy the inclusion criteria for this study, while not meeting any exclusion criteria. Subjects will be followed for at least 6 months following mCRM Therapy System implantation.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Tachycardia, Ventricular Arrhythmia, Ventricular

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

MODULAR ATP Study Participants

All subjects that signed the informed consent were included.

Patients consented to receive the mCRM Therapy System which consists of the EMPOWER Leadless Pacemaker and an EMBLEM S-ICD upgraded with investigational firmware.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

mCRM Therapy System

Intervention Type DEVICE

Communication testing between S-ICD and LCP in 4 body postures as well as required electrical testing.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

mCRM Therapy System

Communication testing between S-ICD and LCP in 4 body postures as well as required electrical testing.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Communication of S-ICD to Leadless Cardiac Pacemaker (LCP)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient who meets Class I, IIa, or IIb guideline ICD indications\[i\],\[ii\], or who has an existing TV-ICD\[iii\] or S-ICD\[iv\]
* Patient who is deemed to be at risk for MVT based on at least ONE of the following:

* History of Non-Sustained MVT with LVEF ≤ 50%
* History of sustained VT/VF (secondary prevention) with LVEF ≤ 50% or significant cardiac scar\*
* History of syncope deemed to be arrhythmic in origin
* History of ischemic cardiomyopathy with LVEF ≤35%
* History of non-ischemic cardiomyopathy with LVEF ≤35% and significant scar\*
* Patient who is willing and capable of providing informed consent (which is not to include the use of a legally authorized representative (LAR) for documentation of informed consent) and participating in all testing associated with this investigation at an approved study site and at the intervals defined by this protocol
* Patient who is age 18 years or above, or of legal age to give informed consent specific to state and national law

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient with an ongoing complication due to Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device (CIED) infection or CIED explant
* Transvenous lead remnants within the heart from a previously implanted CIED (Note: transvenous lead remnants outside the heart (e.g., in the SVC) are allowed)
* Patient with a known LA thrombus
* Patient with a ventricular arrhythmia due to a reversible cause
* Patient indicated for implantation of a dual chamber pacemaker or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)
* Patient with another implanted medical device that could interfere with implant of the leadless pacemaker, such as an implanted inferior vena cava filter or mechanical tricuspid heart valve
* Patient requires rate-responsive pacing therapy
* Patient is entirely pacemaker-dependent (defined as escape rhythm ≤ 30 bpm)
* Patient with Acute Coronary Syndrome (i.e. Acute Myocardial Infarction, Unstable Angina) within 40 days
* Inability to access femoral vein with a 21-French or larger inner diameter introducer sheath due to known anatomy condition, recent surgery, and/ or other relevant condition
* Patient who has an active implanted electronic medical device intended for chronic use concomitantly with the study system, such as a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Note that a temporary pacing wire is allowed.
* Patient with known or suspected sensitivity to Dexamethasone Acetate (DXA)
* Patient with a known cardiovascular anatomy that precludes implant in the right ventricle
* Patient with a known allergy to any system components
* Patient with a known or suspected intolerance to S-ICD conversion testing, based on physician discretion
* Patient is not likely to have meaningful survival\*\* for at least 12 months (documented or per investigator's discretion)
* Patient is enrolled in any other concurrent study. Co-enrollment into other studies such as observational studies/ registries needs prior written approval by BSC. Local mandatory governmental registries are accepted for co-enrollment without approval by BSC.
* Patient who is a woman of childbearing potential who is known to be pregnant at the time of study enrollment (method of assessment upon investigator's discretion)

\[i\]Al-Khatib, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for Management of Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death. A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. (2018); 138:e272-e391.

\[ii\] 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: The Task Force for the Management of Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). European Heart Journal (2015) 36, 2793-2867.

\[iii\] TV-ICD system is expected to be fully explanted during or prior to full Coordinated System implant

\[iv\] Potential subjects with a Model 1010 S-ICD Pulse Generator are only eligible for MODULAR ATP if they are getting upgraded to Model A209, A219 or future BSC S-ICD Pulse Generator; Patients with an existing S-ICD PG subject to the electrical overstress field action are only eligible for MODULAR ATP if they are getting a new BSC Model A209 or A219, or future BSC S-ICD Pulse Generator

\*Significant cardiac scar is defined as a scar involving at least one ventricular myocardial segment (i.e., basal infero-septum) as identified in the official findings of a cMRI, or nuclear viability study, or echo report by the interpreting radiologist/ cardiologist who is not affiliated with the study

\*\*meaningful survival means that a patient has a reasonable quality of life and functional status
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Boston Scientific Corporation

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael Lloyd, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Emory University

Reinoud Knops, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Amsterdam University Medical Centre

Lluis Mont, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona

Vivek Reddy, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Mount Sinai Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Banner University Medical Center Phoenix

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Scottsdale Healthcare - Shea

Scottsdale, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Arrhythmia Research Group

Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

AdventHealth Orlando

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Emory University Hospital

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Baptist Health Lexington

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Cooper Hospital - University Medical Center

Camden, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Northwell University Hospital

Manhasset, New York, United States

Site Status

Mount Sinai Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Clinic

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Ohio State University Medical Center

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Ohio Health Research Institute

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center

Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Erlanger Medical Center

Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Sentara Norfolk General

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

University of Washington Medical Center

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Kepler Universitaetsklinikum

Linz, , Austria

Site Status

Institut de Cardiologie de Quebec (Montreal Heart)

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Institut Universitaire de Cardilogie et Pnuemologie de Quebec (IUCPQ)

Québec, , Canada

Site Status

Na Homolce Hospital

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

CHU Grenoble - Hospital Michallon

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

CHRU de Lille

Lille, , France

Site Status

CHU de Nantes-Hopital Laennec

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Hospital European Georges-Pompidou

Paris, , France

Site Status

Spedali Civil di Brescia

Brescia, , Italy

Site Status

Maria Cecilia Hospital SPA

Cotignola, , Italy

Site Status

AZ Osp Monaldi

Napoli, , Italy

Site Status

Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana

Pisa, , Italy

Site Status

Amsterdam University Medical Center

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

St. Antonius Ziekenhuis

Nieuwegein, , Netherlands

Site Status

Erasmus MC University Medical Center

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

The General Infirmary

Leeds, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital

Liverpool, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Manchester Heart Center

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Southampton University Hospital

Southampton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Austria Canada Czechia France Italy Netherlands Spain United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lloyd MS, Brisben AJ, Reddy VY, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Boersma LVA, Bongiorni MG, Burke MC, Cantillon DJ, Doshi R, Friedman PA, Gras D, Kutalek SP, Neuzil P, Roberts PR, Wright DJ, Appl U, West J, Carter N, Stein KM, Mont L, Knops RE. Design and rationale of the MODULAR ATP global clinical trial: A novel intercommunicative leadless pacing system and the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Heart Rhythm O2. 2023 Jun 2;4(7):448-456. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2023.05.004. eCollection 2023 Jul.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37520021 (View on PubMed)

Knops RE, Lloyd MS, Roberts PR, Wright DJ, Boersma LVA, Doshi R, Friedman PA, Neuzil P, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Bongiorni MG, Burke MC, Gras D, Kutalek SP, Amin AK, Fu EY, Epstein LM, Tolosana JM, Callahan TD, Aasbo JD, Augostini R, Manyam H, Nair DG, Mondesert B, Su WW, Pepper C, Miller MA, Grammes J, Saleh K, Marquie C, Merchant FM, Cha YM, Cunnington C, Frankel DS, West J, Matznick E, Swackhamer B, Brisben AJ, Weinstock J, Stein KM, Reddy VY, Mont L; MODULAR ATP Investigators. A Modular Communicative Leadless Pacing-Defibrillator System. N Engl J Med. 2024 Oct 17;391(15):1402-1412. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2401807. Epub 2024 May 18.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 38767244 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

C1907

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id