Effectiveness of the EMPOWER™ Modular Pacing System and EMBLEM™ Subcutaneous ICD to Communicate Antitachycardia Pacing
NCT ID: NCT04798768
Last Updated: 2025-11-10
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
297 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-07-20
2030-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
MODULAR ATP Study Participants
All subjects that signed the informed consent were included.
Patients consented to receive the mCRM Therapy System which consists of the EMPOWER Leadless Pacemaker and an EMBLEM S-ICD upgraded with investigational firmware.
mCRM Therapy System
Communication testing between S-ICD and LCP in 4 body postures as well as required electrical testing.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
mCRM Therapy System
Communication testing between S-ICD and LCP in 4 body postures as well as required electrical testing.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient who is deemed to be at risk for MVT based on at least ONE of the following:
* History of Non-Sustained MVT with LVEF ≤ 50%
* History of sustained VT/VF (secondary prevention) with LVEF ≤ 50% or significant cardiac scar\*
* History of syncope deemed to be arrhythmic in origin
* History of ischemic cardiomyopathy with LVEF ≤35%
* History of non-ischemic cardiomyopathy with LVEF ≤35% and significant scar\*
* Patient who is willing and capable of providing informed consent (which is not to include the use of a legally authorized representative (LAR) for documentation of informed consent) and participating in all testing associated with this investigation at an approved study site and at the intervals defined by this protocol
* Patient who is age 18 years or above, or of legal age to give informed consent specific to state and national law
Exclusion Criteria
* Transvenous lead remnants within the heart from a previously implanted CIED (Note: transvenous lead remnants outside the heart (e.g., in the SVC) are allowed)
* Patient with a known LA thrombus
* Patient with a ventricular arrhythmia due to a reversible cause
* Patient indicated for implantation of a dual chamber pacemaker or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT)
* Patient with another implanted medical device that could interfere with implant of the leadless pacemaker, such as an implanted inferior vena cava filter or mechanical tricuspid heart valve
* Patient requires rate-responsive pacing therapy
* Patient is entirely pacemaker-dependent (defined as escape rhythm ≤ 30 bpm)
* Patient with Acute Coronary Syndrome (i.e. Acute Myocardial Infarction, Unstable Angina) within 40 days
* Inability to access femoral vein with a 21-French or larger inner diameter introducer sheath due to known anatomy condition, recent surgery, and/ or other relevant condition
* Patient who has an active implanted electronic medical device intended for chronic use concomitantly with the study system, such as a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Note that a temporary pacing wire is allowed.
* Patient with known or suspected sensitivity to Dexamethasone Acetate (DXA)
* Patient with a known cardiovascular anatomy that precludes implant in the right ventricle
* Patient with a known allergy to any system components
* Patient with a known or suspected intolerance to S-ICD conversion testing, based on physician discretion
* Patient is not likely to have meaningful survival\*\* for at least 12 months (documented or per investigator's discretion)
* Patient is enrolled in any other concurrent study. Co-enrollment into other studies such as observational studies/ registries needs prior written approval by BSC. Local mandatory governmental registries are accepted for co-enrollment without approval by BSC.
* Patient who is a woman of childbearing potential who is known to be pregnant at the time of study enrollment (method of assessment upon investigator's discretion)
\[i\]Al-Khatib, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for Management of Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death. A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Circulation. (2018); 138:e272-e391.
\[ii\] 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: The Task Force for the Management of Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). European Heart Journal (2015) 36, 2793-2867.
\[iii\] TV-ICD system is expected to be fully explanted during or prior to full Coordinated System implant
\[iv\] Potential subjects with a Model 1010 S-ICD Pulse Generator are only eligible for MODULAR ATP if they are getting upgraded to Model A209, A219 or future BSC S-ICD Pulse Generator; Patients with an existing S-ICD PG subject to the electrical overstress field action are only eligible for MODULAR ATP if they are getting a new BSC Model A209 or A219, or future BSC S-ICD Pulse Generator
\*Significant cardiac scar is defined as a scar involving at least one ventricular myocardial segment (i.e., basal infero-septum) as identified in the official findings of a cMRI, or nuclear viability study, or echo report by the interpreting radiologist/ cardiologist who is not affiliated with the study
\*\*meaningful survival means that a patient has a reasonable quality of life and functional status
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Boston Scientific Corporation
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael Lloyd, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Emory University
Reinoud Knops, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Amsterdam University Medical Centre
Lluis Mont, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona
Vivek Reddy, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Mount Sinai Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Banner University Medical Center Phoenix
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Scottsdale Healthcare - Shea
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Arrhythmia Research Group
Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States
AdventHealth Orlando
Orlando, Florida, United States
Emory University Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Baptist Health Lexington
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Cooper Hospital - University Medical Center
Camden, New Jersey, United States
Northwell University Hospital
Manhasset, New York, United States
Mount Sinai Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Ohio State University Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Ohio Health Research Institute
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Erlanger Medical Center
Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States
Sentara Norfolk General
Norfolk, Virginia, United States
University of Washington Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, United States
Kepler Universitaetsklinikum
Linz, , Austria
Institut de Cardiologie de Quebec (Montreal Heart)
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Institut Universitaire de Cardilogie et Pnuemologie de Quebec (IUCPQ)
Québec, , Canada
Na Homolce Hospital
Prague, , Czechia
CHU Grenoble - Hospital Michallon
Grenoble, , France
CHRU de Lille
Lille, , France
CHU de Nantes-Hopital Laennec
Nantes, , France
Hospital European Georges-Pompidou
Paris, , France
Spedali Civil di Brescia
Brescia, , Italy
Maria Cecilia Hospital SPA
Cotignola, , Italy
AZ Osp Monaldi
Napoli, , Italy
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana
Pisa, , Italy
Amsterdam University Medical Center
Amsterdam, , Netherlands
St. Antonius Ziekenhuis
Nieuwegein, , Netherlands
Erasmus MC University Medical Center
Rotterdam, , Netherlands
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
Barcelona, , Spain
The General Infirmary
Leeds, , United Kingdom
Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital
Liverpool, , United Kingdom
Manchester Heart Center
Manchester, , United Kingdom
Southampton University Hospital
Southampton, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lloyd MS, Brisben AJ, Reddy VY, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Boersma LVA, Bongiorni MG, Burke MC, Cantillon DJ, Doshi R, Friedman PA, Gras D, Kutalek SP, Neuzil P, Roberts PR, Wright DJ, Appl U, West J, Carter N, Stein KM, Mont L, Knops RE. Design and rationale of the MODULAR ATP global clinical trial: A novel intercommunicative leadless pacing system and the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Heart Rhythm O2. 2023 Jun 2;4(7):448-456. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2023.05.004. eCollection 2023 Jul.
Knops RE, Lloyd MS, Roberts PR, Wright DJ, Boersma LVA, Doshi R, Friedman PA, Neuzil P, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Bongiorni MG, Burke MC, Gras D, Kutalek SP, Amin AK, Fu EY, Epstein LM, Tolosana JM, Callahan TD, Aasbo JD, Augostini R, Manyam H, Nair DG, Mondesert B, Su WW, Pepper C, Miller MA, Grammes J, Saleh K, Marquie C, Merchant FM, Cha YM, Cunnington C, Frankel DS, West J, Matznick E, Swackhamer B, Brisben AJ, Weinstock J, Stein KM, Reddy VY, Mont L; MODULAR ATP Investigators. A Modular Communicative Leadless Pacing-Defibrillator System. N Engl J Med. 2024 Oct 17;391(15):1402-1412. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2401807. Epub 2024 May 18.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
C1907
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id