Micra Transcatheter Pacing System Continued Access Study Protocol

NCT ID: NCT02488681

Last Updated: 2018-04-12

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

285 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-06-30

Study Completion Date

2016-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Medtronic is sponsoring the Micra Continued Access (CA) study to provide continued access to the Micra System while the marketing application is under review by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The Micra CA study is a prospective, non-randomized, multi-center, study designed to allow controlled access of the Micra system when used as intended. All subjects enrolled in the Micra CA Study will be prospectively followed from implant, at 6-month intervals until study closure (i.e. FDA approval). Patients with previous or existing inactive implanted cardiac stimulation systems will have additional follow ups.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Bradycardia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Micra Pacemaker Implant

Micra Pacemaker Implant

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Micra Pacemaker Implant

Intervention Type DEVICE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Micra Pacemaker Implant

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subject or legally authorized representative provides written authorization and/or consent per institution and geographical requirements
* Subject meets Class I or ll indication for implantation of single chamber ventricular pacemaker and is intended to be implanted with a Micra System
* Subject able and accessible for follow-up per study requirements
* Subject is at least 18 years of age
* Patient is not enrolled in a concurrent drug and/or device study that may confound registry result.

Exclusion Criteria

* Subject has had an acute myocardial infraction (AMI) within 30 days of implant
* Subject has implantation of neurostimulator or any other chronically implanted device which uses current in the body
* Subject with mechanical tricuspid valve, implanted vena cava filter, or left ventricular assist device (LVAD)
* Subjects who are morbidly obese and physician believes telemetry communication of ≤5 inches (12.5 cm) could not be obtained with programmer head.
* Subject who femoral venous anatomy is unable to accommodate a 23 French introducer sheath or implant on the right side of the heart (for example due to obstructions or sever tortuosity) in the opinion of the implanter
* Subjects with known intolerance to Nickel-Titanium (Nitinol) Alloy
* Subject for whom a single dose of 1.0mg dexamethasone acetate may be contraindicated
* Subjects with life expectancy less than 12-months
* Subject is enrolled in a concurrent drug and/or device study that may confound CA study results
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Medtronic

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Yale University

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Baptist Heart Specialists

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Baptist Hospital of Miami

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Emory University

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Iowa Heart Center

West Des Moines, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Michigan Heart

Ypsilanti, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

CentraCare Heart and Vascular Center

Saint Cloud, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Mid America Heart Institute

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Morristown Memorial Hospital

Morristown, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

The Valley Hospital

Ridgewood, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

North Shore LIJ Health System

Manhasset, New York, United States

Site Status

NYU Langone Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Duke University Medical Center

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Clinic

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

The Ohio State University

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

University of Oklahoma Health Science Center

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma Heart Hospital Research Foundation

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Providence Health and Services

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Lancaster General Hospital

Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

University of Pittsburgh Medical Center UPMC Presbyterian

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Lankenau Institute for Medical Research

Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

The Stern Cardiovascular Foundation

Germantown, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Vanderbilt University Medical Center Heart and Vascular Institute

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Baylor Research Institute

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

CHI Saint Luke's Health - Baylor Saint Luke's Medical Center

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

University of Virginia Medical Center

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Aurora Cardiovascular Services

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Piccini JP, Cunnane R, Steffel J, El-Chami MF, Reynolds D, Roberts PR, Soejima K, Steinwender C, Garweg C, Chinitz L, Ellis CR, Stromberg K, Fagan DH, Mont L. Development and validation of a risk score for predicting pericardial effusion in patients undergoing leadless pacemaker implantation: experience with the Micra transcatheter pacemaker. Europace. 2022 Jul 21;24(7):1119-1126. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab315.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35025987 (View on PubMed)

El-Chami MF, Shinn T, Bansal S, Martinez-Sande JL, Clementy N, Augostini R, Ravindran B, Sagi V, Ramanna H, Garweg C, Roberts PR, Soejima K, Stromberg K, Fagan DH, Zuniga N, Piccini JP. Leadless pacemaker implant with concomitant atrioventricular node ablation: Experience with the Micra transcatheter pacemaker. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 Mar;32(3):832-841. doi: 10.1111/jce.14881. Epub 2021 Jan 23.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33428248 (View on PubMed)

Garg A, Koneru JN, Fagan DH, Stromberg K, Padala SK, El-Chami MF, Roberts PR, Piccini JP, Cheng A, Ellenbogen KA. Morbidity and mortality in patients precluded for transvenous pacemaker implantation: Experience with a leadless pacemaker. Heart Rhythm. 2020 Dec;17(12):2056-2063. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.07.035. Epub 2020 Aug 4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32763431 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Micra CA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Micra Accelerometer Sensor Study 2
NCT02930980 COMPLETED NA