Acute Cardiovascular and Neuromuscular Responses to Walking With Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) in Older Adults
NCT ID: NCT07275138
Last Updated: 2025-12-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-12-08
2026-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Does walking with BFR increase internal effort, as shown by cardiovascular changes, and is this effect proportional to the level of restriction?
Does walking with BFR temporarily reduce neuromuscular control, and is this reduction greater at higher restriction levels?
Does walking with BFR change gait movement patterns?
This study uses a crossover design, meaning that each participant will complete all four conditions and serve as their own control.
Participants will:
Take part in walking sessions under four conditions with different levels of restriction: BFR40%, BFR80%, SHAM (0% BFR), and CON (without BFR).
Have their cardiovascular responses, muscle performance, and gait movement patterns measured.
Report their perceptions of the sessions, including Rate of Perceived Exertion (RPE), satisfaction, and possible side effects.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparing Vascular Responses to Aerobic Exercise With and Without Blood Flow Restriction in Young and Older Adults
NCT07079280
Comparing Vascular Responses to Resistance Exercise with and Without Blood Flow Restriction in Young and Older Adults
NCT06596304
Blood Flow Restriction and Functionality in Older Adults
NCT06724393
Bloodflow Restricted Exercise in Healthy Ageing
NCT04712955
Blood Flow Restriction With Aerobic Exercise in Frail Older Adults
NCT06155227
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The application of BFR combined with exercise has shown promise as a tool to induce favorable physiological effects at lower training doses, that is, at lower intensities (e.g., lower intensities or slower walking or running speeds), compared to active control groups. However, despite the promising benefits reported in some studies, comprehensive investigation of the cardiovascular and neuromuscular responses during BFR combined with walking remains a largely unexplored area, both in healthy participants and special populations. This knowledge gap is particularly relevant when considering the substantial benefits that older adults and individuals with mobility limitations could gain from BFR combined with walking, especially given their potential difficulty in adhering to the minimum exercise dosage requirements recommended by the World Health Organization
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
BFR40%
BFR set at 40% of the participant's arterial occlusion pressure (AOP).
Walking
Participants will perform two continuous 10-minute walking bouts, separated by a 3-minute seated recovery period to allow reperfusion following BFR or pause, along a rectangular 40-meter walking circuit (15×5 m). Walking cadence will be standardized at 112 steps per minute.
BFR80%
BFR set at 80% of the participant's AOP.
Walking
Participants will perform two continuous 10-minute walking bouts, separated by a 3-minute seated recovery period to allow reperfusion following BFR or pause, along a rectangular 40-meter walking circuit (15×5 m). Walking cadence will be standardized at 112 steps per minute.
BFR0%
BFR set at 0% of the participant's AOP.
Walking
Participants will perform two continuous 10-minute walking bouts, separated by a 3-minute seated recovery period to allow reperfusion following BFR or pause, along a rectangular 40-meter walking circuit (15×5 m). Walking cadence will be standardized at 112 steps per minute.
CON
No BFR cuffs.
Walking
Participants will perform two continuous 10-minute walking bouts, separated by a 3-minute seated recovery period to allow reperfusion following BFR or pause, along a rectangular 40-meter walking circuit (15×5 m). Walking cadence will be standardized at 112 steps per minute.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Walking
Participants will perform two continuous 10-minute walking bouts, separated by a 3-minute seated recovery period to allow reperfusion following BFR or pause, along a rectangular 40-meter walking circuit (15×5 m). Walking cadence will be standardized at 112 steps per minute.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Peripheral vascular disease, defined by an ankle-brachial index (ABI) outside the normal range (0.9-1.4).
* Uncontrolled arterial hypertension (\>180/110 mmHg).
* Any contraindication to exercise, based on self-reported medical history and PAR-Q+.
60 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ministry of Work and Welfare - Xunta de Galicia
OTHER_GOV
Universidade do Porto
OTHER
University of La Laguna
OTHER
Universidade da Coruña
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of Sport of University of Porto
Porto, Porto District, Portugal
Faculty of Education of University of La Laguna
San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CEFADE40_2024
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
ED481B-2024/079
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.