Additive Versus Subtractive Manufacturing Techniques of Custom-Made Plates for the Fixation of Interforaminal Mandibular Fractures
NCT ID: NCT07263633
Last Updated: 2025-12-04
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
16 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-12-28
2025-10-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Accuracy of Patient-Specific Plate for Reduction and Fixation of Mandibular Angle Fracture
NCT07231042
Patient Specific Plates Versus Conventional Miniplates for Treatment of Mandibular Body Fractures
NCT03608891
Evaluation of PEEK Versus Titanium Bar Attachments With Implant Assisted Mandibular Complete Overdenture Fabricated by CAD/CAM Technology
NCT07262307
Comparison of Conventional Versus 3-D Printed Complete Denture Regarding Retention, Accuracy, Elctromyographic Activity and Patient Satisfaction.
NCT05834530
Modified Periosteal Inhibition with Simultaneous Implant Placement in Aesthetic Zone
NCT06519773
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Both study groups demonstrated comparable baseline characteristics with no statistically significant differences regarding age, sex distribution, trauma side, cause of injury, type of fracture, and operative time. All surgical procedures were performed using standardized operative protocols, and postoperative evaluations were conducted at fixed intervals.
Clinical outcomes included wound healing status, postoperative edema, infection, and wound dehiscence. Functional performance was evaluated through maximum mouth opening measurements and patient-reported outcomes involving occlusion and self-chewing ability. Radiographic and mechanical assessments were also performed, including tensile strength, shear strength, and flexural bending tests for the fixation systems used in each group.
Across the follow-up period, both groups showed satisfactory wound healing, absence of infection or dehiscence, progressive improvement in mouth opening, and gradual restoration of occlusal stability and chewing function, with no significant intergroup differences in clinical parameters. Mechanical testing demonstrated significant differences between the two fixation systems.
All collected data were statistically analyzed, and outcomes were reported in accordance with CONSORT guidelines.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
additive plating group
Additive manufacturing typically describes any process where material is gradually added, layer by layer, to form a final product. The term is often used interchangeably with 3D printing and rapid prototyping, although rapid prototyping can also involve other techniques beyond additive methods
additive plating group
Additive manufacturing is the process of creating parts by joining materials based on 3D model data, typically layer by layer, in contrast to subtractive and formative manufacturing methods. While most of the global activity in additive manufacturing currently involves polymer-based systems, there has been increasing interest and activity in fabricating metallic parts
subtractive plating group
In subtractive manufacturing, objects are created by progressively removing material from a solid block or sheet through processes such as cutting, drilling, boring, or grinding. While these processes can be performed manually, they are more commonly executed using computer numeric control (CNC). CNC machining is the most widely used subtractive manufacturing process today
subtractive plating group
In CNC machining, cutting tool removes material to achieve the desired geometry. The process involves using CAD to create the model to be machined and CAM to provide instructions to the CNC machine on how to remove the material. There are three major machining processes for material removal based on 3D models: turning, drilling, and milling. Additional subtractive manufacturing techniques, such as laser cutting, waterjet cutting, electrical discharge machining, and plasma cutting, are typically used for 2D machining
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
subtractive plating group
In CNC machining, cutting tool removes material to achieve the desired geometry. The process involves using CAD to create the model to be machined and CAM to provide instructions to the CNC machine on how to remove the material. There are three major machining processes for material removal based on 3D models: turning, drilling, and milling. Additional subtractive manufacturing techniques, such as laser cutting, waterjet cutting, electrical discharge machining, and plasma cutting, are typically used for 2D machining
additive plating group
Additive manufacturing is the process of creating parts by joining materials based on 3D model data, typically layer by layer, in contrast to subtractive and formative manufacturing methods. While most of the global activity in additive manufacturing currently involves polymer-based systems, there has been increasing interest and activity in fabricating metallic parts
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Comminuted fractures in which it is difficult to fix.
16 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Tanta University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
FARIS INAD S ALANAZI
Principal Investigator, Master's Student, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
FARIS I ALANAZI
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University
Rafic R Bedir
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University
Ahmed G Abushahba
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University
Tanta, Gharbia Governorate, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TANTAOMSF-IFMF-149
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.