Unilateral Attachment Versus Tooth Implant Supported Bridge
NCT ID: NCT04301115
Last Updated: 2020-03-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
24 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-02-01
2019-10-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Materials and methods: Twenty four patients were selected and divided into three equal groups, each of eight patients: patients of group I Patients received a fixed tooth implant supported bridge, patients of group II Patients received a removable unilateral attachment partial denture and group III Patients received a conventional removable partial denture.Evaluation included patient satisfaction and biting force measurement radiographic evaluation of terminal abutments.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparative Evaluation Between One-piece and Two-piece Implants Supporting Mandibular Screw-retained All-On-Four Full-arch Prosthesis on Peri-implant Bone Changes.
NCT06790524
The Evaluation of Facial Bone Changes After Early Implant Placement Protocols "Clinically and Radiographically".
NCT06165913
The Use of a New Safe Angle Position for Implant Placement in the Anterior Region.
NCT05436158
Pre-extractive Inter-radicular Implant Bed Preparation Versus Conventional Post-extractive Inter-radicular Implant Bed Preparation in Mandibular Molars
NCT03640091
Effect of Digital Versus Static Jaw Relation Record on Crestal Bone Changes Around Implants Supporting Maxillary Single Overdenture
NCT06965517
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Materials and methods: Twenty four patients were selected according to the following criteria: Patients with unilateral mandibular distal extension with last standing second premolar abutment, abutments showed sufficient occluso-gingival height and good periodontal condition. Patients were divided into three equal groups, each of eight patients: patients of group I Patients received a fixed tooth implant supported bridge, patients of group II Patients received a removable unilateral attachment partial denture and group III Patients received a conventional removable partial denture.Evaluation included patient satisfaction using "OHIP14" questionnaires and biting force measurement radiographic evaluation of terminal abutments.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
conventional group
conventional partial denture
CONVENTIONAL
conventional metalic partial denture
attachment group
unlateral attachment retained partial denture
attachment
unilateral attachment from rehine 83
tooth implant supporeted prosthesis
tooth implant supported bridge
bridge
tooth implant supported bridge
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
attachment
unilateral attachment from rehine 83
bridge
tooth implant supported bridge
CONVENTIONAL
conventional metalic partial denture
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The abutments showed sufficient occluso-gingival height of its clinical crown
* Adequate inter-arch space and no tempro-mandibular joint disorders.
* No para-functional habits,
* Full opposing arch or restored with acceptable fixed restoration
* Minimal bone height11 mm at the lower second molar area.
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sharaf Mohamed Yahia
lecturer of prosthodontics
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
samira Ibrahim, prof
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
professor of prosthodontics
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Cairo University
Cairo, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
201802
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.