Different Surgical Drilling Protocols in Posterior Maxilla

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

16 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-06-29

Study Completion Date

2024-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Sixteen dental implants inserted in sixteen patients who were selected from the outpatient clinic of the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University, for the rehabilitation of missed single maxillary posterior tooth by an immediately loaded dental implants

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Peri-implant Bone Behaviour Using Two Drilling Techniques in Posterior Maxilla

NCT06770231

Implant

COMPLETED NA

All on Six Versus Parallel Implant Distribution for Maxillary Denture Opposing Mandibular All on Four

NCT05960500

Peri-Implantitis Occlusal Trauma Implant Complication

COMPLETED NA

Immediate Implant With Different Filling Materials

NCT05878392

Immediate Implant

COMPLETED NA

Pre-extractive Inter-radicular Implant Bed Preparation Versus Conventional Post-extractive Inter-radicular Implant Bed Preparation in Mandibular Molars

NCT03640091

Randomized Clinical Trial

UNKNOWN NA

Comparative Study Between Socket Shield Technique Versus Allograft Buccal Sheet Technique on Alveolar Bone Resorption After Immediate Implant Placement

NCT06566001

Bone Loss in Jaw

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

16 dental implants were inserted in 16 patients were divided into two groups: Group A: 8 dental implants were inserted using undersized drilling technique and Group B: 8 dental implants were inserted using single drilling technique. then the dental implants were assessed for 6 months regarding

Clinical Evalution: regarding these parameters after immediately dental implants loading,3 months and 6 months.

implant stability, implant probing depth, bleeding index.

Radiographic evaluation: immediately after implant loading and 6 months after loading regarding bone density and marginal bone loss.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Missing Teeth

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group A dental implant placement by undersized drilling technique.

8 dental implants placed in the healed alveolar posterior maxillary ridge using undersized drilling technique

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

undersized drilling technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In group A The implant site preparation was made according to the protocol of the manufacturer except that the final drill was omitted. The drilling was done using a low speed reduction, high torque with coolant contra-angle hand piece with surgical motor unit. Speed of drilling was 800-1200 rpm.

Group B dental implant placement by single drilling technique

8 dental implants placed in the healed alveolar posterior maxillary ridge using singledrilling technique

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

single drilling technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

In group B The implant bed was prepared using the new specially designed drills. First, the use of the guide drill of length 3.5mm with speed of 800 rpm and torque of 35 nm, then the use of the one drill of the same diameter of the selected implant size to the full length of the osteotomy site.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

undersized drilling technique

In group A The implant site preparation was made according to the protocol of the manufacturer except that the final drill was omitted. The drilling was done using a low speed reduction, high torque with coolant contra-angle hand piece with surgical motor unit. Speed of drilling was 800-1200 rpm.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

single drilling technique

In group B The implant bed was prepared using the new specially designed drills. First, the use of the guide drill of length 3.5mm with speed of 800 rpm and torque of 35 nm, then the use of the one drill of the same diameter of the selected implant size to the full length of the osteotomy site.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with missed one or more posterior maxillary tooth.
* Be older than 18 years and of residual bone height more than10 mm.
* Patients with good oral hygiene and willing to participate in the follow-up sessions.
* Patients with adequate mesio-distal width and inter-arch space.
* Patients without any para-functional habits such as clenching and bruxism.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients whose proposed surgical site had any pathological lesion or root tips.
* Drug or alcohol abuse.
* Patients with uncontrolled systemic diseases.
* Pregnant patients.
* Tobacco use more than fourteen cigarettes daily.

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes