Ultrasound Investigation of Tongue Movement for Implant Overdenture

NCT ID: NCT06705114

Last Updated: 2024-11-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

15 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-10-20

Study Completion Date

2024-09-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aimed to examine the impact of mandibular implant overdentures on tongue movement during mastication.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Each patient received a newly constructed conventional complete denture. To construct the radiographic stent, the mandibular denture was duplicated in clear acrylic resin and modified by placing multiple holes filled with radiopaque gutta-percha points. A stereolithographic surgical guide was then constructed using a dual scan technique with cone beam computerized tomography (CBCT, i-CAT VisionĀ®, Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, PA). Two dental implants were inserted in the patient's mandibular arch at the canine region using guided surgery and a delayed loading protocol. Patients were instructed to rinse their mouth with Chlorohexidine mouthwash just before the implant surgery and continue for one week. A prophylactic antibiotic (Amoxicillin and Clavulanic acid 125 mg) was administered one hour before the surgery and continued for one week after surgery. To control pain, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (Ibuprofen 600 mg) was prescribed. After surgery, patients were prohibited from using the complete denture and were advised to follow a soft diet.

After one week, the mandibular denture was relieved and relined with soft relining material (Softliner; PROMEDICA) and delivered to the patient. After 3-4 months, the dental implants were exposed and ball abutments were screwed into the implants (Fig.1A). The housing of the ball attachments were incorporated into the fitting surface of the mandibular denture using a direct pick-up technique (Fig. 1B). The mandibular overdenture was then inserted into the patient's mouth and occlusal adjustment was done using articulating paper to remove any occlusal interferences. Follow-up visits were scheduled.

Tongue movement measurement The evaluation of tongue movement was conducted using an ultrasound imaging system (Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) with a 3.1-MHz convex probe. A layer of ultrasound jelly (Sono Jelly, Toshiba Medical Systems Corporation) was applied to the patient's skin under the probe. The patient was instructed to sit in upright position, and the probe was placed under the chin area to allow the beam to pass through the distal surfaces of the second premolars on both the right and left sides. The probe was secured in place using a microphone stand (Panasonic System Networks Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) with adjustable height and angle. The position of the tongue was confirmed on the B-mode image of the sagittal plane, which provided a two-dimensional recording of the slice through the oral cavity. The recording rate was 0.0476 seconds (21 frames per second). Ultrasound images were taken while the patient chewed 1/4 of a cookie in a normal manner until it was swallowed.

The ultrasound images were taken at two different oral conditions: 3 months after complete denture insertion and 3 months after mandibular implant overdenture insertion. The ultrasound data were exported from the imaging system via a USB port and transferred to a personal computer. The Articulate Assistant Advanced (AAA) software program version 221.2.0 was used to analyze the data. The software program provides a measurement fan, which is used to automatically set control points at the intersection of the tongue-surface spline and each radial axis. This is done using the AAA edge-detection algorithm, which detects dark-bright discontinuities in the image. (28) The spline was then fitted to the visible surface of the tongue in each relevant video frame (Fig. 2). From the start time (the beginning of mastication) to the end time (when the tongue moved up towards the palate at the start of swallowing), the tongue surface was traced in AAA.

The following items were measured:

1 -Duration of Chewing: From time of food ingestion to the time of beginning of first swallowing.

2- Cumulative displacement of the tongue during Chewing: The distance (in mm) from the tongue surface spline to the anchor point (A) was measured along the radial fan lines at three different points: 30 degrees posterior (B), the center (C), and 30 degrees anterior (D) (Fig. 3). This measurement process was repeated for consecutive video frames. The sum of absolute change between consecutive frames for all measurement points was detected.

3- Tongue surface shape during chewing.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prosthesis Durability

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

group I: complete dentures

Each patient received a newly constructed conventional complete denture.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

complete denture

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Each patient received a newly constructed conventional complete denture with optimal denture extension and lingualized balanced occlusal concept

group II: mandibular implant overdenture

Two dental implants were inserted in the patient's mandibular arch at the canine region using guided surgery and a delayed loading protocol.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

implant overdenture

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Two dental implants were inserted in the patient's mandibular arch at the canine region using guided surgery and a delayed loading protocol.After 3-4 months, the dental implants were exposed and ball abutments were screwed into the implants. The housing of the ball attachments were incorporated into the fitting surface of the mandibular denture using a direct pick-up technique (Fig. 1B). The mandibular overdenture was then inserted into the patient's mouth and occlusal adjustment was done using articulating paper to remove any occlusal interferences. Follow-up visits were scheduled.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

complete denture

Each patient received a newly constructed conventional complete denture with optimal denture extension and lingualized balanced occlusal concept

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

implant overdenture

Two dental implants were inserted in the patient's mandibular arch at the canine region using guided surgery and a delayed loading protocol.After 3-4 months, the dental implants were exposed and ball abutments were screwed into the implants. The housing of the ball attachments were incorporated into the fitting surface of the mandibular denture using a direct pick-up technique (Fig. 1B). The mandibular overdenture was then inserted into the patient's mouth and occlusal adjustment was done using articulating paper to remove any occlusal interferences. Follow-up visits were scheduled.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients were completely edentulous for at least one year, had a normal maxillo-mandibular relationship, and had available inter-arch space. They were nonsmokers and free from any systemic diseases that could affect implant osseointegration

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with head and neck surgery, skeletal deformity, and temporomandibular joint disorder were excluded from the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mansoura University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

faculty of dentistry, mansoura university Mansoura, Egypt,

Al Mansurah, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Goncalves GSY, de Magalhaes KMF, Rocha EP, Dos Santos PH, Assuncao WG. Oral health-related quality of life and satisfaction in edentulous patients rehabilitated with implant-supported full dentures all-on-four concept: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Jan;26(1):83-94. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04213-y. Epub 2021 Oct 13.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 34647147 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

A01010023RP

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.