Effect of iPACK and BiFeS Blocks on Quality of Recovery After Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT ID: NCT07248072
Last Updated: 2025-12-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
74 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-12-01
2026-05-02
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The iPACK block is a commonly used technique that targets the posterior knee capsule, whereas the newer BiFeS block aims to provide more selective posterolateral sensory blockade with potentially reduced risk of motor involvement. However, comparative clinical data between these two techniques are limited.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the difference between the iPACK and BiFeS blocks in terms of Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores at 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary objectives include comparisons of postoperative pain scores, opioid consumption, time to first analgesic request, quadriceps and anterior tibialis muscle strength, functional test performance, time to mobilization, active range of motion, and the incidence of adverse events.
A total of 74 adult patients scheduled for elective unilateral TKA under spinal anesthesia will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio into two groups: ACB + iPACK block or ACB + BiFeS block. All blocks will be performed under ultrasound guidance by an experienced anesthesiologist. Outcome assessments will be conducted by blinded investigators. The study aims to provide high-quality clinical evidence regarding the effectiveness of the BiFeS block compared to the widely used iPACK technique.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of ACB With ACB and BiFeS Combination in Knee Arthroplasty Surgeries
NCT07233785
The Effect of Adding an IPACK Block to the Adductor Canal Block on Total Knee Arthroplasty Surgery
NCT06586840
ESPB and ACB in Knee Arthroplasty
NCT05613101
Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Lumbar ESPB and ACB for Knee Arthroplasty
NCT07115771
Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block vs. Periarticular Injection for Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT05636449
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The adductor canal block is widely used because it provides effective anterior knee analgesia while largely preserving quadriceps motor strength. However, it does not adequately address posterior knee pain. The iPACK block is frequently used to supplement ACB, providing analgesia to the posterior knee capsule by targeting the interspace between the popliteal artery and the posterior capsule. The BiFeS block is a newer regional anesthesia technique that involves injection between the femur and the short head of the biceps femoris muscle, targeting terminal sensory branches supplying the posterolateral knee. Cadaveric and early clinical data suggest that the BiFeS block may provide more selective posterior analgesia with limited spread to motor fibers, but comparative clinical data are scarce.
The primary objective of this study is to determine whether the combination of ACB + BiFeS block results in superior quality of recovery compared to ACB + iPACK block, as measured by the QoR-15 score at 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include QoR-15 at 48 hours; pain scores at rest and during movement; total opioid consumption at 24 and 48 hours; time to first opioid request; quadriceps and anterior tibialis muscle strength; functional performance assessed using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) and Five Times Sit-to-Stand (FTSST) tests; active knee range of motion; time to first mobilization; and the incidence of adverse events such as nausea, vomiting, pruritus, sedation, neurological symptoms, local anesthetic systemic toxicity, and postoperative falls.
Eligible participants are adults aged 18-75 years undergoing elective primary unilateral TKA under spinal anesthesia, with an ASA physical status of I-III. Exclusion criteria include allergy to study medications, coagulopathy, anticoagulant therapy, severe cardiac, hepatic, or renal dysfunction, pre-existing neuropathic pain, infection at the injection site, neuromuscular disorders of the lower limb, pregnancy, or inability to cooperate with postoperative assessments. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. The study has received ethics approval from the Atatürk University Clinical Research Ethics Committee.
Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio using computer-generated block randomization. Both patients and outcome assessors will remain blinded to group assignments. All block procedures will be performed under ultrasound guidance by an experienced anesthesiologist not involved in postoperative assessments. Standardized perioperative management will include spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine, perioperative non-opioid analgesics (paracetamol, dexketoprofen), antiemetic prophylaxis, and postoperative patient-controlled analgesia with fentanyl.
The sample size was calculated based on the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the QoR-15 score, assuming an effect size of 8 points, standard deviation of 10, power of 90%, and α = 0.05, resulting in 33 patients per group. Accounting for a 10% dropout rate, 74 patients will be enrolled.
Data will be analyzed using the intention-to-treat principle. Continuous variables will be compared with independent-samples t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests based on distribution. Mixed-effects models will be used for repeated pain measurements. Categorical variables will be compared using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. ANCOVA may be applied for adjusted analyses of QoR-15 outcomes.
This trial is expected to contribute important clinical evidence regarding the analgesic effectiveness, functional recovery benefits, and safety profile of the BiFeS block compared with the widely used iPACK block, helping guide postoperative analgesia strategies in total knee arthroplasty.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Adductor Canal Block + iPACK Block
Participants in this arm will receive an ultrasound-guided adductor canal block (ACB) using 15 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine, followed by an iPACK (Interspace Between the Popliteal Artery and the Capsule of the posterior Knee) block with 25 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine. Blocks will be performed under sterile ultrasound guidance by an experienced anesthesiologist who will not participate in postoperative assessments. All patients will receive standardized spinal anesthesia and perioperative analgesia.
Adductor Canal Block (ACB) Only
An ultrasound-guided adductor canal block (ACB) will be performed using 15 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine. The probe will be placed on the proximal thigh to visualize the sartorius muscle and femoral artery. The needle will be advanced in-plane into the adductor canal, and correct placement will be confirmed with 2 mL saline before injection. This block aims to provide anterior knee analgesia while preserving quadriceps strength.
IPACK block
The iPACK block will be performed by placing the ultrasound probe at the popliteal region to visualize the popliteal artery and posterior knee capsule. A needle will be advanced in-plane, and 25 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected between the artery and posterior capsule. This block targets posterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty without causing motor block.
Adductor Canal Block + BiFeS Block
Participants in this arm will receive an ultrasound-guided adductor canal block (ACB) using 15 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine, followed by a BiFeS (Biceps Femoris Short Head) block performed by injecting 25 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine into the potential space between the femur and the short head of the biceps femoris muscle. Procedures will be performed under sterile ultrasound guidance by an anesthesiologist not involved in postoperative assessments. All participants will receive standardized spinal anesthesia and perioperative analgesia.
Adductor Canal Block (ACB) Only
An ultrasound-guided adductor canal block (ACB) will be performed using 15 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine. The probe will be placed on the proximal thigh to visualize the sartorius muscle and femoral artery. The needle will be advanced in-plane into the adductor canal, and correct placement will be confirmed with 2 mL saline before injection. This block aims to provide anterior knee analgesia while preserving quadriceps strength.
BiFeS Block
The BiFeS block will be performed with the ultrasound probe placed laterally to visualize the femur cortex and the long and short heads of the biceps femoris muscle. The needle will be advanced in-plane into the potential space between the femur and the short head of the biceps femoris. After confirming position with 2 mL saline, 25 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected. This block provides posterolateral knee analgesia with limited motor involvement.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Adductor Canal Block (ACB) Only
An ultrasound-guided adductor canal block (ACB) will be performed using 15 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine. The probe will be placed on the proximal thigh to visualize the sartorius muscle and femoral artery. The needle will be advanced in-plane into the adductor canal, and correct placement will be confirmed with 2 mL saline before injection. This block aims to provide anterior knee analgesia while preserving quadriceps strength.
IPACK block
The iPACK block will be performed by placing the ultrasound probe at the popliteal region to visualize the popliteal artery and posterior knee capsule. A needle will be advanced in-plane, and 25 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected between the artery and posterior capsule. This block targets posterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty without causing motor block.
BiFeS Block
The BiFeS block will be performed with the ultrasound probe placed laterally to visualize the femur cortex and the long and short heads of the biceps femoris muscle. The needle will be advanced in-plane into the potential space between the femur and the short head of the biceps femoris. After confirming position with 2 mL saline, 25 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected. This block provides posterolateral knee analgesia with limited motor involvement.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Scheduled for elective primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA)
* Planned spinal anesthesia
* ASA physical status I-III
* Ability to understand study procedures and provide written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Coagulopathy or current anticoagulant therapy
* Severe hepatic, renal, or cardiac failure
* History of neuropathic pain
* Infection at the site of proposed nerve block
* Pre-existing neuromuscular disorders in the lower extremities
* Inability to cooperate or refusal to participate in the study
* Pregnancy
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ataturk University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ahmet Murat Yayik
Principal Investigator Ahmet Murat Yayık
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ahmet Murat Yayık, Principal Investigator
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ataturk University Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
Mehmet Akif YILMAZ, assistant doctor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Ataturk University Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ataturk University
Erzurum, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kleif J, Waage J, Christensen KB, Gogenur I. Systematic review of the QoR-15 score, a patient- reported outcome measure measuring quality of recovery after surgery and anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2018 Jan;120(1):28-36. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.013. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
Kilicaslan A, Tulgar S, Ahiskalioglu A, Aycan IO, Kekec AF, Arici AG, Kilic G, Sindel M. Ultrasound-guided biceps femoris short head block: a novel regional anesthesia technique for the posterolateral knee. Pain Med. 2025 Nov 1;26(11):726-732. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaf068.
Sarikaya Ozel E, Taflan MG. Ultrasound-Guided Biceps Femoris Short Head Block for Posterolateral Knee Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Case Report. A A Pract. 2025 Sep 23;19(9):e02060. doi: 10.1213/XAA.0000000000002060. eCollection 2025 Sep 1.
Jaeger P, Zaric D, Fomsgaard JS, Hilsted KL, Bjerregaard J, Gyrn J, Mathiesen O, Larsen TK, Dahl JB. Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for analgesia after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blind study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013 Nov-Dec;38(6):526-32. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000015.
Kehlet H, Dahl JB. Anaesthesia, surgery, and challenges in postoperative recovery. Lancet. 2003 Dec 6;362(9399):1921-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14966-5.
Grosu I, Lavand'homme P, Thienpont E. Pain after knee arthroplasty: an unresolved issue. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Aug;22(8):1744-58. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2750-2. Epub 2013 Nov 8.
Carr AJ, Robertsson O, Graves S, Price AJ, Arden NK, Judge A, Beard DJ. Knee replacement. Lancet. 2012 Apr 7;379(9823):1331-40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60752-6. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
Myles PS, Myles DB, Galagher W, Chew C, MacDonald N, Dennis A. Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Three Quality of Recovery Scales. Anesthesiology. 2016 Jul;125(1):39-45. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001158.
Kertkiatkachorn W, Kampitak W, Tanavalee A, Ngarmukos S. Adductor Canal Block Combined With iPACK (Interspace Between the Popliteal Artery and the Capsule of the Posterior Knee) Block vs Periarticular Injection for Analgesia After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jan;36(1):122-129.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.06.086. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
Abdullah MA, Abu Elyazed MM, Mostafa SF. The Interspace Between Popliteal Artery and Posterior Capsule of the Knee (IPACK) Block in Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Trial. Pain Physician. 2022 May;25(3):E427-E433.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2025/2
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
B.30.2.ATA.0.01.00/769
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.