Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Lumbar ESPB and ACB for Knee Arthroplasty

NCT ID: NCT07115771

Last Updated: 2025-11-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-08-15

Study Completion Date

2026-05-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a surgical procedure frequently associated with moderate-to-severe postoperative pain. While Adductor Canal Block (ACB) has demonstrated analgesic efficacy in TKA, the Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) is also being utilized as part of multimodal analgesia for postoperative pain management in lower extremity surgeries. Currently, there is a gap in the literature as no studies have directly compared the efficacy of ACB and ESPB for pain management following TKA. The primary objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of these two analgesic methods in the context of postoperative analgesia management after total knee arthroplasty.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In our clinic, various regional blocks are applied for analgesia or anesthesia purposes in many surgeries, including knee surgery. For knee surgery, adductor canal block, lumbar epidural analgesia, genicular block, erector spinae plane block, and iPACK block can be used. In our clinic, erector spinae plane block and adductor canal block are routinely applied to knee surgery patients. In our study, we aimed to contribute to the literature by comparing patient satisfaction surveys and pain follow-up in patients undergoing knee arthroplasty who received adductor canal block versus lumbosacral erector spinae plane block, both applied with PROSPECT protocols for postoperative analgesia.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Total Knee Anthroplasty

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
he patient and the outcomes assessor who performs postoperative pain evaluation will not know the group

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Adductor canal block

Patients will receive an adductor canal block preoperatively.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Postoperative analgesia management

Intervention Type OTHER

After identifying the adductor canal with a high-frequency linear US probe (GE ML6-15-D Matrix Linear), 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine local anesthetic solution containing 7.5 mcg of epinephrine (1:200,000) will be administered into the adductor canal using an 80 mm block needle (Stimuplex Ultra®, Braun, Melsungen, Germany).

Erector spinae plane block

Patients will receive a lumbosacral erector spinae plane block in the preoperative period.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Postoperative analgesia management

Intervention Type OTHER

After determining the L5-S1 level with ultrasound guidance, an 80 mm block needle (Stimuplex Ultra®, Braun, Melsungen, Germany) will be advanced in a cranio-caudal direction. Following hydrodissection, 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine local anesthetic solution containing 7.5 mcg of epinephrine (1:200,000) will be administered.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Postoperative analgesia management

After determining the L5-S1 level with ultrasound guidance, an 80 mm block needle (Stimuplex Ultra®, Braun, Melsungen, Germany) will be advanced in a cranio-caudal direction. Following hydrodissection, 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine local anesthetic solution containing 7.5 mcg of epinephrine (1:200,000) will be administered.

Intervention Type OTHER

Postoperative analgesia management

After identifying the adductor canal with a high-frequency linear US probe (GE ML6-15-D Matrix Linear), 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine local anesthetic solution containing 7.5 mcg of epinephrine (1:200,000) will be administered into the adductor canal using an 80 mm block needle (Stimuplex Ultra®, Braun, Melsungen, Germany).

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty surgery
* ASA I-II patients

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient refusal to participate in the study
* Patients with coagulopathy
* Patients history with local anesthetic allergy or toxicity
* Patients with liver and kidney failure
* Mentally disabled patients
* Presence of infection at the injection site
* Pregnant, suspected pregnant, or breastfeeding mothers
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Emre ULUSOY

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Bursa City Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mursel Ekinci

assoc prof

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Bursa City Hospital

Bursa, Nilüfer, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Mursel Ekinci

Role: CONTACT

+905067137596

Emre ULUSOY

Role: CONTACT

+905379492799

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Tran J, Chan VWS, Peng PWH, Agur AMR. Evaluation of the proximal adductor canal block injectate spread: a cadaveric study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Dec 25:rapm-2019-101091. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-101091. Online ahead of print.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31879373 (View on PubMed)

Tao Y, Zheng SQ, Xu T, Wang G, Wang Y, Wu AS, Yue Y. Median effective volume of ropivacaine 0.5% for ultrasound-guided adductor canal block. J Int Med Res. 2018 Oct;46(10):4207-4213. doi: 10.1177/0300060518791685. Epub 2018 Aug 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30124351 (View on PubMed)

Gupta A, Kaur J, Kumar R. Unilateral sacral erector spinae plane block for lower limb surgery in children. Anaesth Rep. 2022 Dec 14;10(2):e12199. doi: 10.1002/anr3.12199. eCollection 2022 Jul-Dec.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36530341 (View on PubMed)

Browne W, Nair BKR. The Timed Up and Go test. Med J Aust. 2019 Jan;210(1):13-14.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.12045. Epub 2018 Dec 28. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30636313 (View on PubMed)

Diwan S, Nair A. Lumbar erector spinae plane block obtunding knee and ankle reflexes. Saudi J Anaesth. 2021 Apr-Jun;15(2):222-224. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_79_20. Epub 2021 Apr 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34188648 (View on PubMed)

Kaya C, Dost B, Tulgar S. Sacral Erector Spinae Plane Block Provides Surgical Anesthesia in Ambulatory Anorectal Surgery: Two Case Reports. Cureus. 2021 Jan 9;13(1):e12598. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12598.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33585088 (View on PubMed)

Selvi O, Azizoglu M, Temel G, Tulgar S, Chitneni A, Cinar EN, Ozer Z, Gurkan Y. Translation and Validation of the Turkish Version of the Quality of Postoperative Recovery Score QoR-15: A Multi-Centred Cohort Study. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim. 2022 Dec;50(6):443-448. doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2022.21417.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36511494 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Bursa Şehir Hastanesi 12

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.